RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


hot1 -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 9:00:19 AM)

I think you can also say that some subs have found someone had a relationship...did not work out and are looking again.  I know that it says I have joined a long time ago, but I have only recently started to look....then found too many online players..so now I am here to play....I meet a lot of people, encourage them to get out and involved in the local community.....if something happens great...if not...I am fine.




SusanofO -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 9:37:02 AM)

Wow. Seven pages of replies and I cannot believe that some didn't say (because it's true) - Some inconsiderate people do not bother to change their profile when they are "taken" and thus no longer looking for a partner. So they appear to be seeking partner - even though they are really not (or are they?)

I think they should make up their mind, and change their profile. Or their Dominants should bring this up, and ask (or demand) that they do this.  Dominants do this too, btw (as was mentioned below).

When I said I was just seeking friends, I meant that - even thought I still got e-mail froms Dominants seeking a partner and did sometimes find that annoying (but at least I understood they may not have believed me. But - it was true, and still is - if I say I am not looking. I am seeking friends only at this point).

But - I did change my profile when I was seeking. And I changed it back when I found what I hope will be a good Dominant for me in the long-term.

It might be hard to believe, but I know there are people who - for whatever reason, laziness, still playing the field even though they've found someone and think they will be happy with them - cannot bear to take themselves out of the ball field, or write a few sentences and change their profile to indicate their current status. Or, for what ever reason (and yes, it is their prerogative - I suppose). But it's also a bit cruel as well, perhaps.

I mean, I know it might take a few weeks to decide if you think someone could be for you. But not 4 months, does it? If you've found someone who could be a good match? I  mean - You're either "still seeking", or you're not "still seeking." If you're monogamous (and for heaven's sake if you are happily paired up), change the profile to indicate your current status, if you think you've found someone who's right for you. It's only fair. Even if you're Poly, IMO, it helps to indicate if you're seeking, or not - people can't assume just because you're Poly that you're seeking possibly them - or can they? 

Why not simply add even one line at the top of a profile when you are "taken"? if you were previously "seeking"? (or put it somewhere in your profile that indicates you are taken). I think it's only fair to do this. I've read posts here that indicate some submissives are in a supposed "quandary" about whether to do this or not - so they do nothing, regardless of having found a very, very good potential match.

I know there are arguments one could make forever about how someone is "just not sure they are the one for me, so I am not chaging my profile yet."

Face it - if you're a submissive female, you're gonna get mail even if you've explicitly stated you are not seeking, probably. I doubt if this is the last chance you'll ever have to find someone, and if you're happy, even if you're "not altogether sure they are the right one," then you are probably focussing on that person you've found, and not much on your incoming e-mail from people thinking you're still looking. Is that fair? 

If you're really not looking, don't bitch if you get e-mail that assumes you are, if you don't explicitly state you are "taken".

By the same token, IMO - if someone says they are not looking, you should take them at their word.

And IMO, If you can't even be bothered to actually read their profile to try to figure out what a person's status is, then you don't deserve their response.

- Susan




SirDominic -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 9:48:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO
Why not simply add one line at the top of a profile when you are "taken"? if you were previously "seeking"?


That seems like sound advice to me; just basic courtesy. Doms should do the same, by the way.

Namaste, Sir Dominic




BOUNTYHUNTER -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 9:52:18 AM)

Maybe they are just like us,their needs are varied and haven't found the correct fit yet and yes many refuse to change their profiles when they have found what they seek..AT in the very least they could change their profile to reflect their availabilty...bounty




GeekyGirl -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 12:08:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

I have to agree with the op as to why are there all of these single women out here and none of them are getting any quality Domidong?

I scrolled back a page or two and looked at the names and profiles:

1) auniquegift: No profile...probably a dude.
2) GeekyGirl: Nice profile some pics and loves horses. Wants some tappin'
3) Zsuzsanna: nice profile some pics looking for some friends to hang out with...(which means fuck)...sexy!
4) Screamergirl: Pics profile...cool..hot.
5) Angelic: Nice pics..Profile...Was a pig for four years....But now wants a serious relationship Fuck!...timing is everything boys!
6) Mirkal:  Dines at the "Y" didn't go any further.
7) Quiverr:  Nice profile no pics....I would really like to fuck whatever it is hiding under that box.
8) Bandit25: nice profile no pics ..Huge Eagles fan...Lets call your ass "Hotel California"...And it's time I checked in!
9) Puella...Nice pics...Blue avatar..lol ..nice profile. hottie
10) Dawn treader..pics, profile ..what more can you say..smokin'!!!
11) Patina: nice pics, profile...says she's not "bi"....You attract more bees with honey!


So!!!  Why are all of these "hotties" SINGLE???  Well I collected all the available imperical research, crunched the numbers....Fed it into the computer....and now the reason for why these women are desperate and are lonely and can't find a man on CM.....(drum roll.... domiguy walks out, dressed to the nines in a tux, takes center stage and addresses the audience...taps mic several times to make sure it is working)   "Uuuhh ..Humm"'..... "The reason why these women have never found anyone on CM,  is because,"  (crowd goes silent with anticipation)..."Because they have no "tit" shots in their profile"....(Domiguy walks offstage as the crowd errupts with applause.)


OMG! I just spewed soda on my keyboard! Thanks a lot Domi! (You owe me a new keyboard!!!!)




akisha -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 12:19:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirDominic

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO
Why not simply add one line at the top of a profile when you are "taken"? if you were previously "seeking"?


That seems like sound advice to me; just basic courtesy. Doms should do the same, by the way.

Namaste, Sir Dominic


Alot of us do actually




BrainSlugs83 -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 12:37:27 PM)

simply4You:  How romantic! [:)] -- I hope you find him!

givemyall: ACK! [:@]




BrainSlugs83 -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 12:39:29 PM)

"Why not simply add one line at the top of a profile when you are "taken"? if you were previously "seeking"? "
Why not actually update your stupid profile so it says you're not actively seeking a dom-male anymore so you don't show up on anymore of the damn searches! [8|]




BrainSlugs83 -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 12:45:51 PM)

"OMG! I just spewed soda on my keyboard! Thanks a lot Domi! (You owe me a new keyboard!!!!) " -- put it in the dish washer -- cold rinse only, hot water will melt it -- give it a good day or two to dry out, it will be fine -- if it doesn't work at first, it's not completely dry, wait another day.




LDRandAstarte -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 12:53:16 PM)

Yes that is possable, but then again, most men are dogs. I speak from personal experience!





carolsea -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 12:59:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: akisha

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirDominic

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO
Why not simply add one line at the top of a profile when you are "taken"? if you were previously "seeking"?


That seems like sound advice to me; just basic courtesy. Doms should do the same, by the way.

Namaste, Sir Dominic


Alot of us do actually


Yes, a lot of us do, including me, but I STILL get requests as though I didn't, and I get those that say "if it doesn't work out...".  I for one (and I know there are others) don't accept a collar with the possibility that it might not work out.  I did without until I realized why I hadn't been interested in anyone else in the last 2 years.  He is The One.              [sm=banana.gif]

And actually, I should point out that I didn't meet him here.  I have met a few people in group settings and then would recognize them from CM, but I've never noticed someone on CM and then met them personally.  I prefer the face-to-face chance meeting route, and that's how I met Dark Angel a few years ago, introduced by friends when he was with someone else who was a friend of mine.




ArgoGeorgia -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 1:05:52 PM)

I think the reason that there are so many people looking on here is legion .  They might be picky - and why not be?  Why settle?  They may not be so picky but haven't found the right person that floats their boat yet.  They could have found someone, lost them, and come back ready to try again (bravo for you, gotta get back up on that horse).  Some might be rude/negligent and just simply not change their profile.  They definitely need spankings.

Now, if they would only return my emails......




puella -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 2:26:29 PM)

hehehe




GeekyGirl -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 2:30:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BrainSlugs83

"Why not simply add one line at the top of a profile when you are "taken"? if you were previously "seeking"? "
Why not actually update your stupid profile so it says you're not actively seeking a dom-male anymore so you don't show up on anymore of the damn searches! [8|]


I agree that this is the thing to do..though I won't actually change my profile until I've met them in person at least once and decided to pursue the relationship. For example, I have been talking to someone for several days now and have a good feeling about our upcoming date...but I won't change my profile until after the 1st date at least.




GeekyGirl -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 2:32:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BrainSlugs83

"OMG! I just spewed soda on my keyboard! Thanks a lot Domi! (You owe me a new keyboard!!!!) " -- put it in the dish washer -- cold rinse only, hot water will melt it -- give it a good day or two to dry out, it will be fine -- if it doesn't work at first, it's not completely dry, wait another day.


The dishwasher???? lol...I think I'll just clean the keyboard with alcohol and bill Domi for my time and effort [:D]




SusanofO -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 3:04:16 PM)

BrainSlug83 - Re: Your comment. The reason I've not taken Dominants off my list of who I am seeking regardless of the fact I am "taken" - Hello! I am not actively seeking a Dominant partner. I am seeking Dominants as friends. I don't care if you approve of this practice. I do have some male Dominants who are friends only. It goes like this...please listen carefully.

If you'll notice, I have checked the "friends only" box, too, as far as my preferences re: Who I am seeking. Presumably, that means I am seeking whoever else I also checked off as far as preferences as "friends only." I realize there may be some confusion about what checking off preferences such as "friends only", in conjunction with other preferences, really means. That is what it means - to me - that might not be what it means to you (but if it doesn't, then maybe think a little harder). I think that is what it means to most people (but In could be wrong, which is one reason I am writing this).

Your comment indicates to me that you're exactly the kind of man who e-mails women without ever reading their actual profile. In which case, IMO, you deserve whatever non-response you may be getting. 

Here is a news bulletin for you hon (and this may be pertinent for others, because maybe there is some confusion about how noting preferences when setting up or editing profiles works): 

First-off- Someone's list of preferences doesn't revolve around anyone else's  "mail control set-up" desires, it revolves around their own preferences, period, IMO. It is the entire reason they exist. If your own mail controls are not controllable to your liking, well then - I guess you'll just have to take some time to think about what the preferences someone has checked off might actually mean. And then follow that up with reading their actual profile.  *Save any assumption that the world revolves around you (and your "mail control set-up issues") for whatever submissive finally decides they'll be yours. Think about it.

On another note: I realize that many (most?) women still get mail even if they've got a partner and even if they've made that clear. I was simply saying if they have a partner (if they are done seeking, evem if they are Poly) - they should make that clear in their profile that they are taken (if they have not done that yet -and some people really don't bother) - because that is the fair thing to do. I realize many probably already do this, but - there are also more than a few folks (from what I've read) who don't really even bother to think about it.

Back to profile preferences: If someone then actually bothers to read the person's profile (after reading who is on their "preferences list"), then they would know someone is "taken", (vs. the men who just simply want to send out "auto-mail" (like you, BrianSlug83?) without bothering with reading profiles). If you bother to actually read an entire profile - then, regardless of however you interpet whoever else they've checked off on their preferences, you'll know where they stand (there may still be some confusion, but IMO, that is more due to a lack of someone being able to interpret what the preferences someone has checked off might mean).

I thought it was pretty evident if someone checked off "friends only" that is what they are seeking - friends only - regardless of whoever else they check off as a preference re: Who they are seeking. It means they are seeking anyone they check off - as "friends only." End of story. I could be wrong, but that's what I was doing, when I set my preferences up on my profile. And I really do think that is how most people interpret would this situation - if they bother to think about it. 

- Susan




scottjk -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 4:04:53 PM)

I think part of the issue is visability on both sides of the fence.
I suppose a valid question to add is: "Are they actually spending time with potentials offline?"

Let's face it people, a profile is an introduction, and those can get a little narfed up, not to mention that little thing called 'self-observation'. How often are we, doms/subs, looking at a profile or email and going, "Mmmm, not quite." and stamp them with 'reject', without any actual face time? Sure, you could rattle off reasons with safety on the top of the list, but that's what the Safety Net program is for, right?

This isn't directed at SusanofO, by the way.




SusanofO -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 4:15:52 PM)

scottjk: I think you're right. Some people will just find a way to reject people, no matter what else is happening, but may not even be very clear themselves on why they are doing that - or, more to the point, appear to be doing that. Maybe they are very busy (or really involved with a new partner, etc). In which case, It might help if they did have a really short profile that just says something like: "Just here for the forums" or something.

This suggestion of mine of a one-line profile might apply better to females, but applies to males, too. If one really isn't even seeking friends or anything, then I'd opt for keeping a profile very short.

I think profiles can be a very valuable tool, but - if somebody isn't spending any time on a search for anyone online (friend or partner) then maybe a very, very short profile that maybe even states that explicitly ("I work a lot and am here for conversation only", etc.- would make that clear? It's one thought anyway. 

- Susan 




BrainSlugs83 -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 6:23:51 PM)

SusanofO:
"I don't care if you approve of this practice." -- good, as my approval is completely unrelated, I wasn't planning on giving or denying it!
Also -- "Friends Only" huh? -- And you're willing to relocate for domiants who you are seeking as friends only? *Looked at your profile*  Again, my approval isn't on the table, but to me that sends a deceptive message.
"It means they are seeking anyone they check off - as "friends only.""
When searching for someone, not checking "Friends Only" still brings up the profiles who are seeking "Friends Only" -- therefore I belive your interpretation of this feature to be in error.  As to me, clicking friends only would mean not only am I searching for x, y, or z, but also people who will be "friends only".
"Your comment indicates to me that you're exactly the kind of man who e-mails women without ever reading their actual profile."  Why would you say that? -- I just joined two days ago; Have emailed two subs, and read BOTH of their profiles/interests -- that puts me at 100%! -- Why so judgemental?  Someone's moody!
Also, I've seen a couple of profiles that say they are actively searching for doms, when in their profile they state very cleary that they are not only owned, but their owners will not let the communicate with other doms!  -- Therefore their prefrences are nonsense, and a huge annoyance.




BrainSlugs83 -> RE: Why are there female subs who are STILL looking? (2/28/2007 6:29:46 PM)

Actually, it would be at three profiles, but on one profile, the person had a public-blog sort of thing that showed up automatically that I also read thru -- when I realized she was a smoker I decided against emailing her... -- Yes, I'm taking offense at your hasty judgement of my character. -- I'm probably going to be moody now for the next 20 minutes. >:-\




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875