Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Double Standard rears it's head


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The Double Standard rears it's head Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/7/2007 9:45:01 PM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
Try reading the posted article....
The lets roll statement was as he started with the other passengers to move forward in the passenger cabin..

Again not said while in the cockpit

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/7/2007 10:29:00 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
I was always of the opinion that the "Lets roll" comment was heard via cell phone...They allowed them to call their loved ones and that is how they learned of the other attacks. (Dumb terrorists) So I was always under the assumption that his wife or whomever he was talking to heard him address some of the other passengers...To my knowledge, and I will do a quick check...that this account is factual.

_____________________________



(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/7/2007 11:06:37 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Whatever the details, Flt 93 taught us all. DO NOT OBEY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS INSTRUCTIONS!!!

The S.O.P. as per the Feds used to be "Cooperate with hijackers". And we all learned on 9/11 that that was the STUPIDEST FUCKING IDEA on the planet.

We know better now, don't we.

Think for yourself. ( or listen to the feds, and do the exact opposite ), and survive.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 9:09:10 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

Try reading the posted article....
The lets roll statement was as he started with the other passengers to move forward in the passenger cabin..

Again not said while in the cockpit


Sternhand4:
The cockpit voice recorder indicates that the only people in the cockpit were the folks from Saudi Arabia (our allies) and that they were the ones who crashed the airplane.  Now would you be so kind as to tell us what your point is.
thompson

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 3/8/2007 9:10:32 AM >

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 9:15:24 AM   
PassingThrough07


Posts: 2
Joined: 3/6/2007
Status: offline
Greetings to A/all..............the sequence of events for Flight 93, basically, was this.............the plane was hijacked, a few people were permitted cell-phone calls, the wife of one passenger, Todd Beamer, knowing that the Towers had already been hit by aircraft, passed the information to her husband, who then organized a resistance.  The "pilots" in the cabin had a guard posted, and it was to rush this guard that "Let's Roll" referred.  Plain, and simply that.  Have an excellent day, A/all.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 9:29:43 AM   
PassingThrough07


Posts: 2
Joined: 3/6/2007
Status: offline
As an addendum to my previous post, obviously (as has been stated earlier by someone else), the cockpit voice recorder would NOT carry the "Let's Roll" comment, for imagine the chaos if all cabin conversations on even routine flights were picked up in the cockpit.  The comment was heard by the WIFE OF the one who uttered the words, over her cell-phone.  I hope that this clears up anything that might have been obscure in my previous post.

(in reply to PassingThrough07)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 3:33:15 PM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

Try reading the posted article....
The lets roll statement was as he started with the other passengers to move forward in the passenger cabin..

Again not said while in the cockpit


Sternhand4:
The cockpit voice recorder indicates that the only people in the cockpit were the folks from Saudi Arabia (our allies) and that they were the ones who crashed the airplane.  Now would you be so kind as to tell us what your point is.
thompson


The point is obvious, you brought up the hijackers in a previous post. You stated ( in part)

we now know from the cockpit voice recorder the lets roll drama  never happened except on television   So it would appear that your cite shows rather the perfidy of your source and not Mr Moore

In rebuttal I pointed out that the cockpit voice recorder wouldn't have picked it up as the conversation took place in the rear of the plane. It was recorded by the GTE operator ( cell phone )
Beamer, 32, told the GTE supervisor, Lisa D. Jefferson, that he and others on the plane had decided they would not be pawns in the hijackers' suicidal plot.
Jefferson told him about the other hijackings and Beamer made her promise to call his wife and their two boys, David, 3, and Andrew, 1.
Beamer's call connected at 9:45 a.m. He told Jefferson there were three hijackers, armed with knives. He did not know their nationalities or their intentions.

Further

He got Jefferson to promise that she would call his family, then dropped the phone, leaving the line open.
That's when Jefferson heard what Lisa Beamer believes were her husband's last words: "Let's roll."

This is where the "lets roll" comments stem from, so in fact it did happen. So if thats you premise for dismissing my previous source then your mistaken.

Also you ask..
Sternhand4:
The cockpit voice recorder indicates that the only people in the cockpit were the folks from Saudi Arabia

3 Were from  Saudia Arabia 1 was from Lebanon.
But more importantly they were Al Qeada.
(our allies)
Al Qeada is not our ally. Saudia Arabia is our ally. ( Nominally, I believe that they are more like a business partner. When we have similar interests they're on board.)
Al Qaeda does not have a national identity, they are a religious based terror organization. They have Americans as well in their membership as well. ( I think the DNC is a fertile recruiting ground for them as both organizations share similar goals, the destruction of this country through conversion to their way of life )
 and that they were the ones who crashed the airplane.  Now would you be so kind as to tell us what your point is.
thompson


That you use specious arguments when you fail to comprehend written material

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 8:41:09 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

Al Qaeda does not have a national identity, they are a religious based terror organization. They have Americans as well in their membership as well. ( I think the DNC is a fertile recruiting ground for them as both organizations share similar goals, the destruction of this country through conversion to their way of life )






(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 8:53:59 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

Try reading the posted article....
The lets roll statement was as he started with the other passengers to move forward in the passenger cabin..

Again not said while in the cockpit


Sternhand4:
The cockpit voice recorder indicates that the only people in the cockpit were the folks from Saudi Arabia (our allies) and that they were the ones who crashed the airplane.  Now would you be so kind as to tell us what your point is.
thompson


The point is obvious, you brought up the hijackers in a previous post. You stated ( in part)

we now know from the cockpit voice recorder the lets roll drama  never happened except on television   So it would appear that your cite shows rather the perfidy of your source and not Mr Moore

In rebuttal I pointed out that the cockpit voice recorder wouldn't have picked it up as the conversation took place in the rear of the plane. It was recorded by the GTE operator ( cell phone )
Beamer, 32, told the GTE supervisor, Lisa D. Jefferson, that he and others on the plane had decided they would not be pawns in the hijackers' suicidal plot.
Jefferson told him about the other hijackings and Beamer made her promise to call his wife and their two boys, David, 3, and Andrew, 1.
Beamer's call connected at 9:45 a.m. He told Jefferson there were three hijackers, armed with knives. He did not know their nationalities or their intentions.

Further

He got Jefferson to promise that she would call his family, then dropped the phone, leaving the line open.
That's when Jefferson heard what Lisa Beamer believes were her husband's last words: "Let's roll."

This is where the "lets roll" comments stem from, so in fact it did happen. So if thats you premise for dismissing my previous source then your mistaken.

Also you ask..
Sternhand4:
The cockpit voice recorder indicates that the only people in the cockpit were the folks from Saudi Arabia

3 Were from  Saudia Arabia 1 was from Lebanon.
But more importantly they were Al Qeada.
(our allies)
Al Qeada is not our ally. Saudia Arabia is our ally. ( Nominally, I believe that they are more like a business partner. When we have similar interests they're on board.)
Al Qaeda does not have a national identity, they are a religious based terror organization. They have Americans as well in their membership as well. ( I think the DNC is a fertile recruiting ground for them as both organizations share similar goals, the destruction of this country through conversion to their way of life )
 and that they were the ones who crashed the airplane.  Now would you be so kind as to tell us what your point is.
thompson


That you use specious arguments when you fail to comprehend written material


Sternhand4:
I have made the point several times.  You seem more intent on obscuring it by implying that I said the cockpit voice recorder did not hear the words "lets roll".  I never said that...what I said is that the lets roll drama never happened...not that the words were not spoken.  Please read what I have posted before you disagree with me.   The link you sited indicates that Beamer & co crashed the plane in Pa.  They never gained access to the cockpit.  So how exactly did they crash the plane?
Your assertion that Al Qaeda and the DNC are in cahoots is just about the silliest thing I have heard you say in your posts.
When you say that Saudi Arabia is not our ally but rather our business partner I would point out that Saudi Arabia allows the U.S, to launch military missions from their soil that would seem to indicate that they are an ally.  Or are you infering that the U.S. and Saudi Arabia are business partners in a business scam to take the oil of Iraq?
How many of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia?  From what I have read all but one was from Saudi Arabia.  If we were attacked by saudi's why are we in Iraq?  Oh yes as shotgun dick said on meet the press "it is and always has been about regime change" so much for weapons of mass deception.
thompson

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 9:42:06 PM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4
Al Qaeda does not have a national identity, they are a religious based terror organization. They have Americans as well in their membership as well. ( I think the DNC is a fertile recruiting ground for them as both organizations share similar goals, the destruction of this country through conversion to their way of life ) 


Would you be so kind as to provide evidence of members of Al Qaeda, that are also members of the DNC?

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 9:46:37 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4
Al Qaeda does not have a national identity, they are a religious based terror organization. They have Americans as well in their membership as well. ( I think the DNC is a fertile recruiting ground for them as both organizations share similar goals, the destruction of this country through conversion to their way of life ) 


Would you be so kind as to provide evidence of members of Al Qaeda, that are also members of the DNC?


Caitlyn, darling, don't be so naive. Conservatives don't bother with trivial details like evidence. They just hurl out slander and bank on enough of its sticking in red-state brains to get them through another election. Should anyone actually call them on this in print or on TV, they crank up the "liberal media bias" tapes.

< Message edited by dcnovice -- 3/8/2007 9:56:29 PM >


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 9:50:28 PM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
I'm being open minded.
 
It seems to me that if a person uses a term like, "fertile recruiting ground" they will undoubtedly have no trouble producing a well researched list of the produce.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 9:55:49 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

It seems to me that if a person uses a term like, "fertile recruiting ground" they will undoubtedly have no trouble producing a well researched list of the produce.


Forgive the cliche, but I'll believe it when I see it.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/8/2007 10:03:26 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

I'm being open minded.
 
It seems to me that if a person uses a term like, "fertile recruiting ground" they will undoubtedly have no trouble producing a well researched list of the produce.


caitlyn:
When I was young I was full of optimism also...but after being shot at a few times in order to make rich people richer I traded in my optimism for realism and better body armour.
thompson

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/9/2007 1:34:17 AM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4
Al Qaeda does not have a national identity, they are a religious based terror organization. They have Americans as well in their membership as well. ( I think the DNC is a fertile recruiting ground for them as both organizations share similar goals, the destruction of this country through conversion to their way of life ) 


Would you be so kind as to provide evidence of members of Al Qaeda, that are also members of the DNC?


Caitlyn, darling, don't be so naive. Conservatives don't bother with trivial details like evidence. They just hurl out slander and bank on enough of its sticking in red-state brains to get them through another election. Should anyone actually call them on this in print or on TV, they crank up the "liberal media bias" tapes.

Originally I meant it as a bit of humor, but upon further research I found the following..

But with delegates like Ismael Ahmed, it’s a tough sell.
Ahmed, a Michigan delegate to this week’s Democratic National Convention, is a long-time Democratic activist and a repeat delegate.
But the Democrats aren’t touting him to the media. In fact, the only place you’ll read about Ahmed’s delegate credentials is on Al-Jazeerah’s website.
In this first Presidential nominating convention since 9/11, Ahmed’s presence at the convention and his views are more disturbing than ever.
Ahmed is the founder and executive director of ACCESS – the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services, based in Dearborn, Michigan.
Under Ahmed’s leadership, ACCESS paid for commercial driving lessons and attempts at hazardous material hauling certificates for two men convicted as part of the Detroit Al-Qaeda sleeper cell. Testimony at their trial revealed that the men planned to bomb the MGM Grand Casino and a host of other prominent US sites.
More chilling is that since ACCESS’ multi-million dollar budget is largely tax-funded, tax dollars likely paid for these men to get their "job training" organized by ACCESS.
When confronted with this, Ahmed made no apologies. On the contrary, he was defiant in defending his organization’s aid to the Qaeda sleepers, comparing their membership in the terrorist group to mere "political credential," such as Democrat or Republican.
 
But I also based it upon the tenor of rhetoric such as..
 




Why Does Al Qaeda Sound Like The DNC?

Quote


Al Qaeda’s number two man, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has come out with a taped message for the world and America (just in time for our upcoming elections) which sounds just like DNC talking points:

“Can’t you [Bush] be honest at least once in your life, and admit that you are a deceitful liar who intentionally deceived your nation when you drove them to war in Iraq,” al-Zawahri said in a portion of the video released by the Washington-based SITE Institute.

You know, I swear I have heard and read that claim before. Oh yes, I heard something similar from Howard Dean:

Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean rejected the criticism on Sunday and said, “The truth is, the president misled America when he sent us to war.” …Dean said, “This is an administration that has a fundamental problem telling the truth.”

But I am certain I have heard this from others. Ah yes, John Kerry as he “reported for duty” at the DNC convention in 2004:

Sen. John Kerry challenged President Bush’s Iraq policy in blunt, biting terms Thursday night and promised cheering Democratic National Convention delegates, “I will be a commander in chief who will never mislead us into war.”

And Kerry said it many times:

SEN. JOHN KERRY: The bottom line is that the president and his administration did mislead America into war.

Where else have we heard Zawahiri’s claim before. Ah yes, Senator Harry Reid:

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid says he wants to make sure the President Bush can’t mislead the nation on Iran the way Bush supposedly misled Americans on the situation in Iraq.

Zawahiri also claims America tortured Jihadists we have captured and interrogated

“Your agents in the Arabian Peninsula, Yemen, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan have captured thousands of the youth and soldiers of Islam whom you made to taste at your hands and the hands of your agents various types of punishment and torture,”

Well, at least we did not behead them on TV for propaganda and then allow mobs to desecrate their bodies in the open streets. But I know I have heard this claim before. Again, Rep Nancy Pelosi:

“Tonight at long last, because of Congressman John Murtha’s leadership and persistence, the House finally went on record in favor of clear procedures for dealing with prisoners and against torture.

“Our troops were sent to war in Iraq without many of the essentials needed for their effectiveness and their safety, including a standard of conduct for the treatment of detainees. We have seen, to our great shame and regret, the consequences of this lack of clarity. At Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in Iraq, at Guantanamo, and in Afghanistan, allegations and evidence of detainee abuse have damaged the standing of the United States in the world.

“The United States has long been bound by international agreements prohibiting torture. That we even find it necessary to make the prohibition against torture more explicit is the result of the Bush Administration’s legal interpretation that these long-standing prohibitions apply only to persons on U.S. soil.

And of course we have Sen Ted Kennedy chiming in with Zawahiri:

None of us can forget the images from Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad that shocked our nation nearly two years ago and stained the United States in the eyes of the world. The American people suddenly realized an unpleasant truth - the cruel practice of torture had infected the ranks of the world’s finest military.

How about President Clinton joining Zawahiri’s chorus:

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton joined a chorus of critics of Bush administration proposals for the treatment of suspected terrorists, saying they would give broad approval to torture.

Shouldn’t the FEC look into whether Al Qaeda is giving in kind political donations to the Democrats for all these supporting claims? Even Al Jazeera has snippets of Bob Woodward’s book (or at least its conclusions) that Bush is hiding the full losses in the war in Iraq. I am wondering how many rabid posters at Huffington and KoS and DU are actually Al Qaeda supporters egging on our pool of useful idiots. Zawahiri’s rants are near copies of posts all over these lefty sites.

Any anti-war, liberal Democrat who complains about side-by-side comparisons between themselves and Al Qaeda have earned it this election cycle. It is beginning to be hard to tell the terrorists from the minority insurgents fighting the Bushitler regime.


so if it quacks like an Al Qaeda...

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/9/2007 1:56:34 AM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

so if it quacks like an Al Qaeda...


So what you are saying is "You are either with us or you are with the terrorists". 

Did it take all that just to get back here?

If it were really that simple Bush would be a genius. Regrettably for the world, neither is the case.


Z.

_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/9/2007 6:21:47 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
For every example, a counter example:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/16/terror/main2488520.shtml


Terrorism charges brought Friday against the administrator of a loan investment program claimed that he secretly tried to send $152,000 to the Middle East to buy equipment such as night vision goggles for a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan.

...


He was also charged with money laundering for allegedly causing the transfer on Aug. 17 of about $25,000 from a bank account in New York to a bank account in Montreal, Canada. The money was to be used to provide material support to terrorist, prosecutors said.

The indictment also charged him with wire fraud conspiracy and wire fraud

...

Alishtari is a donor to the Republican Party, as he claims on his curriculum vitae. Alishtari gave $15,500 to the National Republican Campaign Committee between 2002 and 2004, according to Federal Election Commission records. That amount includes $13,000 in 2003, a year when he claims to have been named NRCC New York State Businessman of the Year.

Alishtari also claims to be a lifetime member of the National Republican Senate Committee's Inner Circle, which the NRCC describes as "an impressive cross-section of American society – community leaders, business executives, entrepreneurs, retirees, and sports and entertainment celebrities – all of whom hold a deep interest in our nation's prosperity and security."



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/9/2007 6:24:04 AM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

so if it quacks like an Al Qaeda...


So what you are saying is "You are either with us or you are with the terrorists". 
No I'm saying the groups have members that share a similar mind set. Most Dems are just as patriotic as the next guy. But the fringe elements use the same rhetoric as the Al Qeada crews. And if I was looking to recruit members for Al qeada I would start with people that had my same ideals.

Did it take all that just to get back here?

If it were really that simple Bush would be a genius. Regrettably for the world, neither is the case.
Yea, I know, party line here Republican presidents= dumb.
We have heard it before.
Does it comfort the left to repeat this mantra?

Z.

(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/9/2007 6:37:05 AM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

For every example, a counter example:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/16/terror/main2488520.shtml


Terrorism charges brought Friday against the administrator of a loan investment program claimed that he secretly tried to send $152,000 to the Middle East to buy equipment such as night vision goggles for a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan.

...


He was also charged with money laundering for allegedly causing the transfer on Aug. 17 of about $25,000 from a bank account in New York to a bank account in Montreal, Canada. The money was to be used to provide material support to terrorist, prosecutors said.

The indictment also charged him with wire fraud conspiracy and wire fraud

...

Alishtari is a donor to the Republican Party, as he claims on his curriculum vitae. Alishtari gave $15,500 to the National Republican Campaign Committee between 2002 and 2004, according to Federal Election Commission records. That amount includes $13,000 in 2003, a year when he claims to have been named NRCC New York State Businessman of the Year.

Alishtari also claims to be a lifetime member of the National Republican Senate Committee's Inner Circle, which the NRCC describes as "an impressive cross-section of American society – community leaders, business executives, entrepreneurs, retirees, and sports and entertainment celebrities – all of whom hold a deep interest in our nation's prosperity and security."



So this gentleman wrote a check to support the republican party. It doesnt make him a member of the RNC does it ( although to be fair it could have, no different than any other political party)
But maybe your point was that politicians accept money from outside the US.
Like..
1996 Illegal Campaign Donations
Another factor involved in the November 1996 waiver issued by then-President Clinton is the fact that illegal money entered the U.S. elections from the Chinese army. The money was donated to the DNC from a variety of sources including convicted Chinagate figures John Huang, Charlie "Yah-Lin" Trie and Johnny Chung.
The 1996 Clinton-Gore campaign readily accepted much of the money from the Chinese army sources without question, and in some cases took these donations in cash. The allegations of Chinese espionage and illegal campaign donations were never investigated properly.
The successful effort by China to obtain U.S. microchip technology included espionage, sabotage and perhaps bribery. The red intelligence windfall freed the Chinese army to more accurately target American cities with atomic weapons using advanced U.S technology.
The legacy that President Clinton left for the 21st century is a modern Chinese army equipped for global nuclear war.
 
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/29/25139.shtml

I have no doubt that politicians accept money from all the people the care to write the checks. I have never seen a vetting process for screening the donors. Perhaps their should be a central list for this.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: The Double Standard rears it's head - 3/9/2007 6:37:41 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
If Bush is so smart, why did he invade Iraq? They were neither a danger to the US, nor involved in 9/11.

If Bush is so smart, why doesn't he know the definition of "Sovereign"?

When President Bush was questioned about tribal sovereignty in the 21st century at a gathering of minority journalists he responded: "Tribal sovereignty means that. It's sovereign. You're a ... you're a ... you've been given sovereignty and you're viewed as a sovereign entity."



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The Double Standard rears it's head Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094