Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
The stated goal given was to train the sub up to a Domme, so it sounds as if a permanent collar would NOT be necessary or appropriate as then the Domme would (likely) not be a collared sub to them, or at all. Do they wish to be a "Domme Team of Three" in six months?...ending up as a convent of Dommes to attract and have their combined way on unsuspecting subs?...or expecting subs perhaps....what evil administrations do they plan?! chrissy, We had some of these same questions. In fact, beth was a little put off because the Mistress description of the goal indicated that bing a 'Mistress' was a goal for this submissive as if being a 'slave' wasn't or shouldn't be a goal unto itself; at least for a female. Well, that was her opinion and it was shared by this submissive; validating the claim in this instance. I pointed out to beth, whether we agreed with her or not didn't matter anymore than our relationship needing validation of our contract and relationship goals. Reduced to its basic level, what we witness was an example of a goal oriented relationship. The sub greatly admired and respected the Mistresses. There was emotion involved. The Mistress we spoke with spoke of "love". She said that the submissive petitioned them to train her. The six month contract period gave a fixed time of commitment of all parties. We weren't privileged to see the contents but I'm sure specific goals were stipulated along with rules for the contract period. Regardless of the specifics, or if we or anyone else agrees with the goals, isn't it good to have them documented in order to maintain focus over a period of time? Wouldn't every relationship be better served if all parties to it knew what was expected of them and, fulfilling those expectations, common desired results? quote:
But more seriously I wonder why anyone would engage in such training fully knowing they are training the sub "up and out" to become a Dom/Domme, or in other cases, where the sub stays a sub/slave, is likely even to hand ownership over to another D/D once enough suitable training is completed? The same question can be asked; "why would anyone want to be trained and come out of the training as a slave?" The point is, as long as both parties have a goal and get satisfaction progressing through the journey the 'goal' is relatively immaterial. The end result, or goal, can be purely educational, or a deep as being de-humanized. The collar is "only" the physical representation of the commitment made by both parties. Felt by the wearer, viewed by the trainer, it is a reminder of their commitment. I distinguish a "training" collar from a permanent one by the permanence of the symbol. Some use branding, a locking collar, or some other physical reference. In our case, when the time came, I decided to add to the collar by each of us getting a tattoo. Whether a collar or some other talisman is used, what it represents is unique to the relationship, the relationship goals, and the people involved. Because people are involved, integrity varies, commitment varies, definition vary, and the 'why do it?' is unique. Which brings us back to your point. In the case of what we witnessed, it was obvious that all involved were committed to a common goal. That is the only motivation required.
|