perverseangelic
Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004 From: Davis, Ca Status: offline
|
Very very very very very well put Emerald. I was trying to figure out how to say "but it's not about my love for power exchange, it's about my -identity- as a person to be owned." It's not that I find one thing more important, it's that I -am- that thing, and no matter how much I love someone I will no more stop being that than I will stop having blue eyes. I will say that I think you can be innactive. I am pansexual, however I am monogamous (basically). That is, I'm attracted to a whole lot of people, I am only invovled with one. I think (though I'm not sure) I have the ability (and desire) to be poly. Again, I'm monogamous. My point being -some- aspects of your personality are there, period, but can manage to not be expressed. I think this depends a lot on the person, though, and who they -are- versus what they want. Hrm. Not sure if that makes sense. I tried,.
_____________________________
~in the begining it is always dark~
|