ScooterTrash
Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005 From: Indiana Status: offline
|
Just a casual reminder to some of the posters, these are forum boards..expect diverse opinions and gezzz, don't take them so personally, I expect others to have their own thoughts..it is how we learn. That being said, this is a topic I have debated several times in different places..there has never been a conclusion of if any one thing is right, so I won't profess to say any one answer is, but this is my thought on the whole slave issue; When someone get's into the "lifestyle", many are confused on the various roles. I believe that comes about because of so many different sources of information, books, on-line sites, forum boards (winks), opinions of others at a munch, etc. What is certain..there are submissive attitudes and there are Dominant attitudes. Many do what I feel is the proper way to go about learning and growing and come into the BDSM scene as a submissive. They learn "things" and then make a decision later on of what they feel their natural tendencies are. Not all start this way...I feel they would be better off if they did however, I think the insight from a Dominant perspective would be much clearer if they had some experience as a sub. OK...so then it get cloudy...the submissive side has another entity, a concept that has been around for what I would assume is thousands of years, that of a slave. So, many associate themselves with that feeling, as that seems to explain them much more fully. I won't attempt to go into the variations and differences of a sub to a slave, but I will stick my vulnerable neck out and say there is one specific difference. You can be a submissive, you can be a submissive without being in a relationship, you can be a submissive with slave tendencies, but you cannot be a slave and not be owned. So...in my mind, a natural slave (if forced to come up with a definition) would have to be a submissive that had very strong tendencies toward giving up that total control as a slave, someone who when put into a relationship takes very little time to transform form sub to slave. I feel that slave is a step that is reached by a submissive, when they have gained the trust required to completely "let go", to move their Master or Mistress to Owner status. Myself, I have not yet had a sub reach that plateau, I hope to someday. But for myself, I would be wary of someone approaching me, stating they were a natural slave, if they were available. This goes against my way of thinking. I know many feel different, that's fine, this is simply my take on the whole slave term in general. Like I said previously..I have been involved in many debates on this subject with no concise conclusions. Food for thought is all..anyone hungry?..lol.
_____________________________
Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound. -Albert Einstein
|