daddysprop247
Posts: 1712
Joined: 6/24/2005 From: DC Metro area Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Celeste43 If you can't be a slave unless you're owned then you can't be a submissive unless you're actively being dominated. What you can do in both situations is say that when in a relationship you prefer a M/s or a D/s one. Besides, being an unowned slave doesn't mean you're submissive. It doesn't mean you accept the wrong change at a store because you're unable to talk back. It doesn't mean you wait patiently for someone to make space for you in a crowded bus line. It's as much a reference to a relationship role as is slave. this is where my beliefs differ from many in the lifestyle...i do not view being "a" submissive as a relationship role. imo, one who is submissive only within the confines of a particular relationship, is not "a" submissive, tho they may be submissive by general lifestyle standards. the person with the uncontrollable drive/need to please others, who takes the wrong change, doesn't make a fuss when wronged, does for others even at the expense of themselves, etc...these are qualities of a submissive. submissive is a personality trait. slave is a status. like doctor, teacher, coalminer. sure, you can be born with a nature and desires that would make a good slave (or doctor, teacher, coalminer), however until you are actually owned you are not a slave. but, just as a retired doctor is still considered "doctor", a slave whose Master has passed away is still slave. the exception would be if a slave were actually released by the Owner...if i were released, and not given to another, i would not consider myself slave. i would just be a submissive with slave training and wiring.
|