puella -> RE: Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency? (3/16/2007 6:36:15 PM)
|
Lets start with this, Sanity... Did you watch the entire proceedings? I did. Now lets work backwards from your links. Yahoo news plucks its articles from other sources... your second one came from a publication called "Investors Business Daily", The title of the piece is "Blonde Faith"... sorry, but right off the bat it is demonstrating its opinions of the people in the piece, and opinions are not a part of credible journalism... but to make it that much clearer...the entire piece is riddled with half truths, opinions and belittling comments about her.. not at all credible in my opinion... laughable is more like it. Yahoo also snips news from TMZ, that doesn't make it legitimate journalism) The first article is from AP, which is a reputable news source. That article states: " "She revealed little new information about the case, which sparked a federal investigation and brought perjury and obstruction of justice convictions of Vice President Dick Cheney's former top aid.." That is pretty much true, as there was a lot of really damning evidence exposed there. However, the purpose of this hearing is not at all the same as that of the Libby trial, and Valerie Wilson is still not allowed to comment on much, due to the covert nature of her work at the CIA: [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031600276_2.html ] "In an opening statement, Waxman, the committee chairman, said the purpose of the hearing was to determine how the leak of Plame's identity occurred, whether the White House took appropriate investigative and disciplinary steps afterward and what changes are needed to prevent a recurrence." "Any characterization that minimizes the personal risk of Ms. Wilson that she accepted in her assignments is flatly wrong," Waxman said. "There should be no confusion on this point." He said her work was so sensitive that she is still prohibited by the CIA from publicly discussing many details of it." I happen to think there was some very important information uncovered today, including testimony regarding the Senate Intelligence Committee: "Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) asked Plame whether she had talked to a Counter proliferation Division reports officer at the CIA who was interviewed by the Senate Intelligence Committee and allegedly said she played a role in Wilson's trip. "Yes, Congressman," Plame replied. "And I can tell you that he came to me almost with tears in his eyes. He said his words have been twisted and distorted. He wrote a memo, and he asked a supervisor to allow him to be reinterviewed by the committee. And the memo went nowhere, and his request to be reinterviewed so that the record could be set straight was denied." Waxman said his committee "will insist on getting that memo." And the discrediting of Victoria Toensing;s (talk about partisan interests : http://mediamatters.org/items/200501140005 ) in er assertions that Valerie Wilson was not covert: Under questioning from Democrats who quoted the CIA as saying Plame's affiliation with the agency was classified, Toensing acknowledged that the improper disclosure of classified information violates a 1995 executive order. There was much more than that but, I think those two things alone merit "important new information". Also, there is no need to bold and enlarge your font. I can read quite well, thank you. There is also no need to get petty with childish remarks to me, simply because you do not appreciate my position on this matter.
|
|
|
|