curiouslyseeking
Posts: 924
Joined: 1/11/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold <fast reply> I am laughing at some of this. I think Merc is absolutley right! I am not sure you could ever find such a panel! For Myself, and this has already been brought up, I could not give up My authority enough to allow someone else to pick for Me. Now I might consider a situation wherein there are several Dominants and several submissives, and we all live together( like a tribe? *Wink*). Casting could be considered on the basis of the D/s, M/s and/or BDSM philosophies of all, so that there could be an assumption that there was sufficient commonalities between one or more of the "cast". Now, as we express our Dominant and submissive selves, we can see what matches might emerge! You could even release info regarding these philosophies so the audiencecould guess who might match up with whom and then see how it doesn't all work out that way! Ah, that oh so human factor! *Smile* I also think that 90 days is about all I could stand! I vote for a lovely villa in Hawaii as the location! In answer to the other question, no, I do not have to be in love to dominate. I prefer to have a reasonably comfortable (read mutual trust) relationship with the submissive/slave, but I do not have to be in love. I just need to know his/her heart with regard to the M/s relationship we seek. And that, in and of itself, takes time. PRICELESS! ....Do you know who you would like to be in a tribe with? Also on the love aspect..someone quoted Tina Turner the other day in a thread....what's love got to do with it?....but in the end, ya never know...could have all to do with it. Thank you for sharing, GoddessDustyGold
_____________________________
"The ultimate freedom is the freedom to choose to have no choice"
|