darkinshadows
Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004 From: UK Status: offline
|
I don't see anyone 'knocking' the phrase or poking holes, but it's misuse. So many people throw it around like its a mantra, it has lost it's original meaning. As Stein states - quote:
The organized gay-rights movement has been accused many a time of marginalizing those who don’t fit a "respectable" or "straight-acting" image, and in some cases that’s a fair objection. But when it came to choosing a slogan for the S/M-Leather-Fetish Contingent in the 1987 march, that wasn’t our intention. Note that this first use of "safe, sane, and consensual" occurred in a context that also included concepts like community, responsibility, tradition, education, and gay liberation. Moreover, the rubric "safe, sane, and consensual" itself was explicitly presented as embracing all degrees of commitment, from "a total lifestyle" to "an occasional adventure," as well as S/M practitioners ranging from novices to veterans. Therefore, rather than saying, "This is what S/M is, and it’s okay, nothing to be worried about," the GMSMA statement of purpose said, in effect, "This is the kind of S/M we stand for and support. S/M can be damaging, crazy, or coercive, but it doesn’t have to be, and together we’re going to learn how to tell the difference." If someone was deliberately careless or irresponsible, or broke agreements about limits, we didn’t say, "He’s not doing S/M" but rather, "He’s not doing the kind of S/M we can support." Do you see people in 'general' terms using SSC in those contexts? No - it is often misused, misplaced and that is what often causes people to seemingly reject it - when in fact the rejection is the motives behind using it. Peace and Rapture
_____________________________
.dark. ...i surrender to gravity and the unknown... |