ferryman777 -> RE: Republican morality (4/2/2007 7:54:32 AM)
|
I agree 100%, I never slandered anyone, and always maintain civility in my posts, quite the contrary to some others on this forum. True, free speech, within a certain framework, that is understood, accusations without proof is slander; and should not be the method of operation. Censorship curtails free speech, that is all I'm saying; the party should state the facts, those facts should be actual and not fabricated non-sense just to agitate and obsure truth. Your first post, the one I responded to; Read as to my interpetation and understanding, as if, you were warning Simply Michael to tow the mark, go along with the status quo, or be ousted; but now that I understand your intent, It makes perfect sense. Failure to comprehend my apparent 'knee-jerk' response which was met with insult & mockery, when the respondants could have simply asked in a civil manner an explanation of my response, if they were all in a thither and were bothered so much by what I said. The only respondant who exhibited good sense was from one called Sanity, who comprehended my meaning, and he and I disagree on many perspectives. I am always astonished at the insulty remarks I read on these forums, when respondants do not agree on idealogies, and I think, of that bible saying..."cast not your pearls of wisdom before swine, fore they will turn and rend them unto you." And in my misunderstanding your intent, and the subsequent responses I received certainly proved that to be of the upmost truth.
|
|
|
|