meatcleaver
Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn You miss the point ... the United States has never been big on any sort of tariffs at all ... but certainly could. If you think European unity is such that individual countries wouldn't make private deals with the Americans, you are diluding yourself. This is a good read. A French report, by the way. I'm sure you will say that the translation is bad.  http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/12/dossiers/europe_relations_etats-unis_english.asp By the way ... still waiting for that list of ill effects that you have suffered, because we are so hard to deal with. I've never said European countries don't make private deals with other countries, they are still independent countries. The deals have to conform to European law. As for the US not being big on tariffs, it has a tendency to prefer subsidies rather than tariffs to help its industries, both agriculture and aerospace industries are heavily subsidized. However Bush did impose the steel tariff when he first came to power. There have been accusations that the US protects much of its technological industries by claiming state security when it is merely protecting them from competition. Insisting oil and other raw materials must be refined on its territory is an old imperial way of helping its own industry at the expense of competition. As I have said, the US couldn't impose anything on European countries because retaliation by the EU would mean it would hurt itself too and even if the EU didn't it could have asked GATT for a ruling like the EU and Japan did over the steel tariffs and if GATT found against the US it would have a comparable fine imposed. The world has moved on from the 60s and 70s.
_____________________________
There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.
|