Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth this slave understands fully your explanations of the differences of "types" of limits that you perceive and how they apply to "a" slave or "a" Master or "a" relationship--in theory and generalization. got it the first time. *sigh* This does not appear to be the case, and I'm obviously not able to explain it. Hence, I'll stop trying to do that. quote:
what you seem not to understand is that a slave or sub could actually NOT limit by way of rules, demands, safewords, hard or soft, the relationship they are a part of, or their Master/Mistress. And here is where I say you're just focusing on one side of the issue. Everything you have mentioned here is related to what I called "hard" or "relationship" limits. But I'm not about to go back and try to explain the other type unless anyone specifically wants me to. quote:
it happens in many relationships. just because folks outside the realtionship don't understand, or think it's unsafe, or wouldn't do it themselves, doesn't make it inherently wrong, unethical, unrealistic, unhealthy, impossible, unfulfilling, misrepresented or undesired by others. I know it happens in many relationships. I understand. I think it can be safe, depending on the Master. I would certainly do it myself, just with a specific standard of informed consent up front, one that will seem odd to most, I'd wager, but, yeah, I'd do it myself. I don't think it's inherently wrong (I'm a moral relativist, there is no "inherently wrong" in any action or point of view, IMO). I don't think it's unethical, as long as prior consent was given. I don't think it's unrealistic. I haven't a clue as to whether it's healthy, nor do I care if the slave agrees to it up front. I know it's not impossible. I imagine it would be very fulfilling. I don't consider it undesireable. Can I possibly be more clear? Sincerely, Aswad.
|