NorthernGent
Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent Are there circumstances where the supression of a nation's sovereignty and ideas are acceptable? Does such surpression contradict the ideals of freedom and democracy? Feel free to discuss. Suppression, or criticism? Criticizing is acceptable, taking matters into your own hands and trying to change things...rebellious. Sometimes rebellious can be a necessary thing...but of course that would have to be my opinion since the country I live in rebelled against some other country across the pond...it was, er, uh, hmmm...oh yeah, England. Don't get excited NG....just stirring the pot.....lol. Criticism is fine. Any free nation should have open criticism and a vast array of ideas. What does it say about a nation all believing in the same thing? What does it say about a nation all believing in the righteousness of an idea? It doesn't say much for freedom of thought. Where thought is free, and by extension people are truly free, there can only be a wide range of political ideas, because surely we're not robots with inate tendencies to agree with each other? Anyway, you know me Scooter - easily excited ;-) Surpression of ideas is a different matter entirely. Speaking of England and imperialism - it was completely at odds with freedom - the idea that the English could go 'round the world and dictate what people needed was denying people their liberty. I was going to say I'm glad the empire has gone as I wouldn't have wanted to live in that age, but we have Blair on a crusade of enlightenment and we have basically swapped colonisation for economic and moral imperialism. As we're talking about armed rebellion, I'm genuinely curious: was the armed rebellion of Americans/the colonists justified? and is the armed rebellion of communists justified? Let's not get excited, only stirring the pot Scooter ;-)
_____________________________
I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits. Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.
|