mp072004
Posts: 381
Joined: 12/22/2005 Status: offline
|
Some people like to receive only what they want. This doesn't strike me as odd or wrong. It also doesn't strike me as submissive. I wish we had a more precise word for this, however. A person who receives *sensation* that he or she wants, independent of power exchange, is called a bottom, but what do we call a person who is led about on a leash or who responds to requests to fetch and present food and drink because he or she independently wants to do those things? In my correspondence and in my profile on here, I prefer to use "a submissive," "a personal submissive," "a relational submissive," to describe a person who agrees to obey me when not playing. I do attempt to improve the lives of people in that category--and, to use those people to enrich my life when not playing. I call other people "servants," and "play partners" or "playmates." I distinguish pure SM play from play that involves an agreement that I get to run things and some sensation, but I don't use a different word to describe each one. I do use a different word to describe service sans play. Presumably, though, people who obey, either in scenes or outside them, do it because they find it *fulfilling*. It may not necessarily be "fun," that is, immediately pleasurable, but it must somehow make their lives better, otherwise, they wouldn't do it for long. Monica
|