Sicarius
Posts: 180
Joined: 2/26/2007 From: New Orleans Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy The person in the car was not seeking cover, he was shooting back at the police officers out an open car window. You realize that shooting out of an open car window, which is vastly smaller than the profile of a human body, would still count as firing from 'cover,' I hope. Your assertion that he was not seeking cover would mean that he was standing up fully erect in perfectly plain sight on top of the roof of the vehicle waving his arms back and forth saying: "shoot me." quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy The context in which I made that statement was about the fact that higher brain functions and small motor movements deteriorate under adrenalin stress. The closest officer was no more than 3 meters away. The furthest away was 10 meters. I don't care about the context of your comment, merely the inherent interpretation of events that transpired. The reality of the situation is that there were additional factors contributing to the situation that you are describing, first and foremost being the fact that the perpetrator was inside a vehicle that provided substantial protection to him on account of the fact that the vast majority of police officers are firing service pistols with 9mm slugs or hollwpoints that are designed for knockdown power rather than armor penetration. These rounds are built to delaminate and expend the entirety of their kinetic energy within several inches of human flesh, which is only slightly more dense than water. Imagine what their efficiency at going through steel is. quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy Additionally, it is a single incident culled from the NYPD crime bureau. If the exception were as admissable as the consensus and the rule, debates would be a very interesting thing. I'm not sure if you're admitting that by pointing out that this is a single incident or not. Please clarify. quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy I also made the point that our gun expert pointed out that 2 out of 72 was at or slightly below the average. You posted 15% or approximately 1 in 7. I cannot argue authoritatively either way; just sharing what I was told. And what I am telling you is that I am an expert with such knowledge and information. If you would like to pair me up with your expert to conduct a formal debate on the average accuracy rate of military and law enforcement personnel in a CQB environment as established by the past forty years of statistics and records, I would be more than happy to do so. Now that I also think about this comment in retrospect, I want to ask you something point-blank: is your gun expert claiming that 2 out of 72 shots (1 hit out of 36) is average, or is your gun expert claiming that 1 out of 36 fired by ten officers for an average of 1 in 3.6 is average? Either way the problem I have with this particular scenario is that I don't necessarily believe that all ten officers should have immediately begun blasting off rounds, but I am not intimately familiar with the situation that you're referring to. If you are able to cite or reference the specific incident, I would be very appreciative of that from the standpoint of analyzing what happened. quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy My self-defense expertise is limited, as far as handguns (or knives) are concerned, with how to fight somebody who has one when you dont. Please dont respond that only an idiot goes unarmed to a gunfight, sometimes people dont have the luxury to be armed or able to get their gun out before somebody has the drop on them. I teach how to deal with that situation, not the morality or other issues behind whether to go around armed or not. I don't believe that you're an idiot for that. There are plenty of ways to defend yourself while unarmed or less-armed against a perpetrator who has a weapon superior to your own, including a firearm. The reality of the situation, however, is that a firearm vastly slants the playing field in favor of the individual who is carrying it. While it may be possible to disarm a gunman with your bare hands or a melee implement of some variety, you must be exceedingly cautious in your attempt to do so. Furthermore, I would never attempt such a thing unless I very clearly had a psychological or tactical advantage in my favor, such as diminished access or the utilization of tactical angles in an urban environment. -Sicarius
< Message edited by Sicarius -- 4/24/2007 10:48:00 PM >
|