Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried and failed?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried and failed? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 1:33:15 PM   
addicted2it


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/31/2004
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArgoGeorgia

I have tried - well, kind of - in the past, but always found myself coming back to one degree or another.  And usually my attempts at going vanilla were full of frustration and unmet needs.  Personally, I blame the internet.  Damn you Al Gore!


Yes, that is true for me as well.  I guess it proves that you can take the you out of BDSM, but you can't remove the BDSM from you.

Good luck and be well!

-addicted2it



_____________________________

"What I lack in wisdom and intelligence, I more than make up or with age."

(in reply to ArgoGeorgia)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 1:46:58 PM   
complaisant1


Posts: 5
Joined: 4/9/2007
Status: offline
The trouble with "who is in the lifestyle and who is out of it" is that there is no clear definition for IT. . I enjoy life as an alternative lifestyler. my lifestyle is different  to everyone I know and I do not any 2 people who are practising identical lifestyles.  There is no leaving, entering...there is only accepting who you are and then being  either:  IN THE LIFESTYLE( being with someone who accepts you). or OUT OF THE LIFESTYLE ( being with someone that you either do not express it to or with someone who will not allow you to express it).

If  someone is trying to follow a doctrine,,for example Castle Realm.or My own lifestyle. and they subsequently adopt that lifestyle I would suggest  that they have become submissive to the author of that lifestyle. In leaving the lifestyle they have ascertained that following someone elses doctrines is not for them and have given up submitting to it.

~This is My Lifestyle, it is only yours if you choose to adopt it~

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 1:56:15 PM   
spankmepink11


Posts: 1310
Joined: 9/28/2005
Status: offline
I've tried to go back to vanilla a few times, but i soon find myself yearning, i doubt i'll try again.  I have no desire to "turn off" or  hide away any part of myself and settling for vanilla for me...would be doing just that.

(in reply to KatyLied)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:00:41 PM   
WhiplashSmile


Posts: 1472
Joined: 6/8/2004
Status: offline
I think LA hit the nail the head for some of the reasons why people go from BDSM and Vanilla based relationships.

I actually have heartbroken over both BDSM and Vanilla based relationships.  The fact remains be it BDSM or Vanilla it does not change who I am.  Does not change my kinky desires urges or personality.

In terms of Vanilla relationships,  my natural gravitation towards BDSM always becomes a pulling force at some point in time.  I even went to far to get ride of mytoy box.  However, this does not work for me.  Why?  Because I end up buying a few extra play things for kinky sex (rope, restaints, bondage tape, nipple clamps, floggers, body oil, clothes pins..).   At first buying the really light weight small toy or play floggers.. after she was used to it, then getting into buying a little heavy one.  Well you get the picture.  But there is more...

I often found myself training, (ah um.. requesting things, topping, and wanting things)... in the bedroom and outside the bedroom.  However, I'm not or should I say very resistent to being topped or in being told what to do.  Gone so far in Vanilla relationships to tell the other, that I hate being told what to do and to get out of my hair.   If I want to do it, I will or will not.  I will deal with thing in how I see fit and blah blah blah.   Needless to say, at times I was accused of being too.. Ummmm Self Centered at times, because I refused or rebelled against her attempts at exterting authority.   If I had in my mind to do XYZ, I would explain why I wanted to do XYZ in that order.   She was wanting ZXY done in that order.  I would explain why I thought ZXY was a bad order to do.   So there were times of doing head butting.   To make matters worse, often it was not real issues we fought about.  We fought about Power itself,  where as XYZ was an order that would make sense to anybody, she had a thing for simply wanting it her way..  ZXY no matter how bad of a plan it was.   Something called pride or the struggle for power itself was happening.  Not Good dynamics at work in a relationship.

Issues about her feeling if she was in control about things in the relationship or not type of stuff.  I always had/have a open ear and mind to hearing what anybody thinks or suggests.  One of the biggest problems I found, was the other person using or attempting to use guilt trips as a tactic to have their own way.   I do not respond well to this.   Another facet, is that I don't like disagreements to break down into mindless name calling and shouting matches.   Whenever, this type of shit occured.. I would simply refuse to get into it with them.   Tell them I'd talk about it when they could calm down.  This seemed to add more fuel to the fire at times, as if I was not willing to talk about shit.   I found myself longing very much for full blown D/s BDSM dyanamics at times.   I've never had such off the wall communication encounters with Dommes or submissives.   Most Dommes I know would rather had a rational or logical debate, one that was centered on problem or issue solving.  With sub/slave types, they are aware of the importance about respect and how to communicate and assert themselves.

I'm not perfect by any means.  I will admit when I make a mistake or fuck up.  However, the last thing I care for is for somebody to use my mistakes against me in an attempt to control other aspects of the relationship.  In part low ball guilt trip tactics.   It's a challenge when dealing with a Vanilla who is used to playing guilt trip games.  A lot of BDSMers are or should be more in control of themselves.  Concepts of self discipline and discipline.   Mainly because they grew up in households or had previous relationships without structure or understanding of discipline.   Dommes and sub/slaves know and understand self discipline, and are not as lost as some vanillas are.  

In terms of kinky bedroom sex play, this has not been a major issue in my past relationships.   It's everything outside of this box that has been a problem.   I think LA did hit the nail on the head about relationship skills in general. 

My last two relationships were for 7 and 5 years.  Shortest ones being around 6-7 months (enough to figure out if it was working or not).  My best ones were for 1-2 years and ended for personal life goal direction reasons.

I had one relationship with a Domme, it was an awesome experience in terms dynamics, easier than the D/s dynamics in some of my relationships with subs even.   However for me vanilla dynamics have been a little more troublesome.  

Yes my last relationship of 5 years was with a Vanilla who was not fully in touch with herself.  We had kinky sex and did kinky things (somewhat limited to my tastes).   In many regards I grew from the experience and it was a challenge.  I could simply dismiss it as a mistake, however some really great things came out of it as well.

It's a bit of a bitch trying to do vanilla when you have had some great BDSM based relationships.  I'm not saying it can or can not be done.  You just need to have patience and understanding and PICK a GOOD partner!

as LA uses for a Tag line.  Find a Stable partner not a stable of partners! 

Finding a stable partner I believe is the key to any relationship be it Vanilla or BDSM based.  I'm totally oh so convinced about this it's not funny.   If you don't have a stable partner your Vanilla of BDSM relationship is doomed...

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:03:29 PM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
I have no inclination to go back for any reason at all.

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:07:01 PM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
~Fast Reply~

For the right person, I think could live without a 24/7 d/s relationship, as long as there was plenty of bedroom kink. I really don't know though and to be honest, I don't have a desire to try.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:07:17 PM   
passionateBBs


Posts: 24
Joined: 1/3/2007
Status: offline
going vanilla.....i found out about all of this at such a young age, that i never gave vanillia a chance...but as i got older...i have tried...in trying to find out about myself...it didn't work...i think that once you get a "bite" of the lifestyle..it is with you forever....

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:08:51 PM   
Asraii


Posts: 91
Status: offline
I could live without the kink; I could live without the D/s. AS long as I was happy with the person that I was with, the rest is just frosting on the cake.

_____________________________

Nothing prevents happiness like the memory of happiness
Andre Gide

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:20:50 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: addicted2it

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

[Some good stuff snipped for brevity}

Suffice to say, I left the lifestyle for a while.  Did the vanilla thing.  Married a vanilla man.  Put that part of Myself "away" and went along quite content for a while.

Through some non vanilla/non BDSM exploration We decided to do as a couple, We met up with a submissive last year that brought Me right back in.  When that part of Me was woke back up, it wasn't exactly easy to hide it.

Anyway, after My husband and I got through the "Why didn't you tell me" phase, he accepted it as who I am.  He knows I'm happier in the lifestyle rather than not, which makes a lot of sense.  After all, isn't anybody happier being who they really are?


It is always reassuring to hear that there are success stories, and that everthing does work itself out in time.  You are very lucky to have a husband who understands your needs and is supportive.  I wish all stories could turn out as well as yours did.

-addicted2it




Yes, I'm very much aware that it could have gone another way. though I really do shudder to think of it.  Some have come up against this very same situation, and it didn't work out very well.  I've run into one or two  who are divorced now for this very same reason.

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:26:04 PM   
addicted2it


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/31/2004
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: complaisant1

The trouble with "who is in the lifestyle and who is out of it" is that there is no clear definition for IT. . I enjoy life as an alternative lifestyler. my lifestyle is different  to everyone I know and I do not any 2 people who are practising identical lifestyles.  There is no leaving, entering...


Yes, and a very good point.  There is no clear cut definition pertaining to anything in life, including BDSM.  Many grey areas do exhist within all relationships, and no one should have to be labeled one way or another.  To make a statement that someone is in or out of the scene dependent upon their own personal involvement would be a disservice to the truth.

-addicted2it



_____________________________

"What I lack in wisdom and intelligence, I more than make up or with age."

(in reply to complaisant1)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:26:56 PM   
Dastardly


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/30/2006
Status: offline
Like others even though I wouldn't have classed them as anything other than vanilla relationships I've had relationships where the power has been mine, or I've struggled to make it mine. I think Whiplashsmile was correct when he spoke about fighting for power and not being aware/concious/explicit about what you are doing. And every single relationship I've ever been in has been kinky in the bedroom, in one way or another. I'm wired so that I just don't DO 'nilla sex and to be honest what is vanilla sex now? 20 years ago when I was growing up I'd never heard about dildos and anal sex and bondage, now you can buy it on the high street and what used to be seen as perve is now mainstream. I've yet to meet a man/woman who can't be led down the kinkalicious path in the bedroom, either a little or a hell of a lot.

Could I live without the S/M? Nope, sex aint sex for me if someone aint hurting a little bit LOL
Could I live without the D/s? I honestly don't know. Within BDSM it is so much easier, you have your roles and you negotiate, you TALK about how the power is gonna be distributed. Within 'nilla relationships this just isn't a conscious thing, you're supposed to share and consequently you end up with either sub conscious agreeements on who has the control or you end up battling because both want it. I don't just date perves now, I date butch women who don't ID as kink and I am really upfront from the beginning - not about being a Domme, that would scare them off LOL but I tell them I am a bossy cow who likes her own way and expects to be treated in a certain manner. And most of the time that seems to work. It's stealth D/s in a 'nilla world.


_____________________________

'Out of sorrow entire worlds have been built
Out of longing great wonders have been willed'
Nick Cave

(in reply to Asraii)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:27:38 PM   
addicted2it


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/31/2004
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Asraii

I could live without the kink; I could live without the D/s. AS long as I was happy with the person that I was with, the rest is just frosting on the cake.


Love conqueres all.  Spoken as a true romantic.

-addicted2it


_____________________________

"What I lack in wisdom and intelligence, I more than make up or with age."

(in reply to Asraii)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:40:41 PM   
xethnkitten


Posts: 44
Joined: 1/6/2007
Status: offline
when life (aka little wee ones) intervened, we backed off the lifestyle a bit.  Saved it for behind closed doors.  So, no we've really gone back to vanilla.  I was considering it for a bit, but the lifestyle kept creeping up.  I don't know that I could successfully turn my back on it.

Xeth's kitten

(in reply to KatyLied)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:43:12 PM   
softness


Posts: 2918
Joined: 8/1/2006
From: Leeds, UK
Status: offline
has had to "turn back" .. for a variety of reasons. i now have a totally vanilla girlfriend whom i adore and am sure will grow to love very much indeed. i know i couldn't have a purely vanilla relationship with a man, so have not even attempted to try. Girlf knows all about my tastes and desires, she is also fully aware of why i have chosen to box those wants off for a time. i didn't climb back in the closet, and i thik that helped a lot to make our relationship work at first

our vanilla relationship works because our sex life is almost non existent... my ability to BDSM play is limited anyway so i would be restricted to vanilla sex even if i was with a  Dom. i think because there is not the huge sexual gap between us ...  the relationship is actually really strong. the focus, care and affection we have for each other more than makes up for the lack of sweaty jungle sex i couldn't have and she doesn't want anyway.

only time will tell the long term viability of what we have, but the main stumbling block for many in switching back is the problem of sexual fullfillment .. thats simply not an issue for us


_____________________________

proudly wearing the blue collar of consideration to DK Leather, Leatherdykeuk, and LeatherEagle of the UK KRueL Leather Family

veritas, respectus honorque in corio





(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:48:27 PM   
slavejali


Posts: 2918
Status: offline
I kinda did what LA mentioned but I think there is more to it than running away (for me anyways) as I can relate to what MasterGremlin said too, something to the effect of "I don't think ive ever really been in a vanilla based relationship".

I had a "vanilla" partner between BDSM Masters but the D/s dynamic was still definately there, just the kinky stuff was missing. When  I was in that realtionship, I didn't think I missed the kinky play, I really loved my life and loved the relationship I was in, loved my partner with all of my heart. I didn't feel anything was "missing" from my life.

After he died, I played around on internet bdsm chat, kinda as therapy, mostly as distraction from the pain I was feeling. I wasn't searching for a BDSM Master, I really felt my life as a slave was over, a closed chapter of my life...it was a pretty shocking experience for me when I started to literally feel like some part of me that had been closed off started opening again..I wasn't even aware that anything had shut down inside me..I don't even know how to describe it..but fuck I started to feel alive again..like "me" again.

Sometimes I think about this whole dynamic... cause our inner workings really fascinate me, exploring the inner dynamics that go on inside me is  better than watching the best movie ever created, better than discovering the light bulb to me, more fulfilling than climbing the highest mountain or traveling to the most remote location. Anyways, yeah I think about this whole process sometimes.

I ask myself the question "Ok, so I've had both, relationship with no kink, relationship with kink. I've been happy in both. The D/s dynamic is the common theme. ive come to the conclusion that I am submissive in relationship, that is what makes me happy. Yet between both kinds of relationships there is a difference "the play"..yet is that all it is? If its just "play" thats there or not, why is it that when my whole head gets into "being a slave" it awakens something extra that just falls asleep when the bdsm aspect isnt there..so its got to be about more than the "play". Like "play" itself is just the same as going skiing really. its thrilling, fun, exciting, an adult kinda playground to have fun with your partner in..that can't be the only difference.?? Can it?

I just woke up...but right now i don't think I can figure it out...cuz where my head is at now....  There is something more fulfilling to me about being in a bdsm master/slave relationship than just being in a "vanilla" D/s relationship..its like my whole being gets involved, every part of me..right now I can'tfigure out what the trigger is...or the difference...but its got to be about more than the "play". I don't really get it.

I havent failed in the transition between the differing relationships, I'm very good at relationship...but over the process of my relationships I have really noticed a remarkable difference in them within myself and what each relationship has been able to provoke in me.

I need more coffee...Im still half asleep, hope I didn't babble too much.

_____________________________

Freedom in Bondage

Different Strokes for Different Folks

"I'll always have a *soft spot* for Sadists"

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:53:35 PM   
mstrjx


Posts: 2045
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline
Personally, I would stay here and fail at finding a relationship but continuing to be true to myself.

Going back to a place I haven't visited for 16 years would just be depressing and of no value whatsoever.  I look to the future, never the past.

Jeff

_____________________________

Know thyself. It's the best gift you can ever give yourself.

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 2:53:55 PM   
addicted2it


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/31/2004
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dastardly

20 years ago when I was growing up I'd never heard about dildos and anal sex and bondage, now you can buy it on the high street and what used to be seen as perve is now mainstream. I've yet to meet a man/woman who can't be led down the kinkalicious path in the bedroom, either a little or a hell of a lot.


Yes, times HAVE changed, along with people's perception of what is "moral" or "immoral," acceptable social behavior or not acceptable behavior.

I have no doubt that it is possible to lead many people down the path to kink in the bedroom today.  What was thought to be taboo even five years ago is now quite prevalent in the mainstream of sexual behavior. Personally, I believe that this is is a positive trend.  However, those who practice a little bit of bondage and/or a little bit flaggelation in the bedroom may only be experimenting, and are not truly into the level of BDSM that is talked about in this forum.

quote:


Within BDSM it is so much easier, you have your roles and you negotiate, you TALK about how the power is gonna be distributed. Within 'nilla relationships this just isn't a conscious thing...


Yes, the roles within BDSM are more clearly-defined.  What criteria are relationships really based upon, but the communication of feelings, needs and expectations?

-addicted2it



< Message edited by addicted2it -- 4/26/2007 2:57:22 PM >


_____________________________

"What I lack in wisdom and intelligence, I more than make up or with age."

(in reply to Dastardly)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 3:14:20 PM   
ShadowWalker1031


Posts: 1
Joined: 4/20/2007
Status: offline
Well, here it goes.  I have never posted on a board before.
The vanilla question interested me and I wanted to say something on it.  I had my first real experience with the BDSM lifestyle four years ago when I met a beautiful woman in PA.  We spent two years together and she introduced me to the lifestyle r/t.  I had always known that I was a very dominant person/lover and that I intensely enjoyed being with women that had masochistic tendencies as they were very appealing to the sadistic urges that I had spent most of my life trying to explain away, rationalize, or just plain ignore.  I had spent years reading and role playing online before I met  beautiful in PA.  It's very different reading versus actually experiencing, living and practicing the lifestyle.  I still have so much to learn.  I ended up in a VERY vanilla lifestyle/relationship when I moved to FL, after PA and I split.  I had suffered a horrible tragedy of losing a child and needed somewhere to just be, without really thinking and feeling much.  I loved vanilla FL very much and had a wonderful relationship.  Once I started getting back to interacting with the real world I became extremely restless.  There were constant power struggles, even though she was always submissive.  It was fine to submit as long as it didn't actually have to be acknowledged and spelled out that I was the one in charge.  I felt the intense pull of this lifestyle and tried so hard to rationlize and force myself to accept a life, love and relationship without it. 
I inundated myself with guilt.  She had been there for me when I needed someone to stand beside me and hold me up.  She had kept me sheltered from the real world while I grieved and raged against the Universe.  She had been my sanity when all sanity had been chased from my being, my mind, my very soul.  How could I turn around and say, you know what, I'm better now and this isn't for me.
Eventually, I was unable to reconcile the need to dance in the circle and attention of a submissive soul.  I spent the last year of the relationship see sawing back and forth between I can do this, it's enough and knowing deep down that my soul was not being fed.  I asked her if she would be willing to explore this lifestyle with me and her response was, absolutely not. 
So, as is the case in most everything in nature, life is cyclical.  I am come full circle and here I stand again, at the doorway to something that burns into me and sears the very thought of vanilla from my being.  I have gone back to vanilla and come back to myself again, to Dominance and submission, to sadism and masochism.  I feel like I am standing on the doorstep to home.  So, yes, I have been to vanilla and failed.

(in reply to slavejali)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 3:21:05 PM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline


I took a non-kinky, non-submissive man who was "curious" about a variety of erotic variations and seduced him and made him fall in love with me to get him to submit to my desires.  Now he will try anything; it's a match made in heaven. I don't miss the submissive agenda associated with kink-oriented guys (which is fine, as long as our fetishes were 100% equally aligned and appetites were the same, which was a hard match - either I wanted more than him, or he wanted more than me) and enjoy the connections on a variety of level I share with my mate.

When I crave other activities that are outside of his realm of comfort or interest (although there's little he won't engage in for me -- but sometimes even if he says yes, I kind of want to do it with someone else) I explore through other avenues.

I think seducing and converting non kinky guys is not that bad.  Femdoms have it a lot easier - not many men, no matter how conservative, object to a woman who says she wants to take control of his sexuality, make him into a sex toy, carry the burden of making the first moves, is honest and open about what pleases her, communicates clearly and with direction (vs. expecting a man to read minds), etc.   

If I had found a self proclaimed submissive who met all my other needs and desires first, that would have worked, but I wasn't finding compatibility in the kink world and wanted to keep my options open.

Akasha


_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried ... - 4/26/2007 3:21:44 PM   
slavejali


Posts: 2918
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: addicted2it

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dastardly

quote:


Within BDSM it is so much easier, you have your roles and you negotiate, you TALK about how the power is gonna be distributed. Within 'nilla relationships this just isn't a conscious thing...


Yes, the roles within BDSM are more clearly-defined.  What criteria are relationships really based upon, but the communication of feelings, needs and expectations?

-addicted2it




Do you think thats always true and really shows a difference between a vanilla and bdsm relationship? 

From my experience you can have very defined roles within a vanilla relationship too. In the 2 "vanilla" relationships I've had, my role within them was very apparent...it might not have been "spoken" about very much...but each of those partners chose me because I knew how to be/am submissive to my partner and that was the underlaying dynamic of the relationship.

My head is at not really knowing what the difference between a vanilla and chocolat relationship at the moment (lol)..it can't be just the play...but so many other differences people describe I just cant relate to as Ive experienced them  in both types of relationships.

So when someone like the OP asks...could you go back ....I can't relate because I just can't work out what the differences are exactly.

< Message edited by slavejali -- 4/26/2007 3:35:00 PM >


_____________________________

Freedom in Bondage

Different Strokes for Different Folks

"I'll always have a *soft spot* for Sadists"

(in reply to addicted2it)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Going back to vanilla. Would you? Have you tried and failed? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109