seekingOwnertoo
Posts: 1323
Joined: 8/1/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven quote:
ORIGINAL: stef The words have no universally agreed upon meaning as far as BDSM is concerned. Not only that, but trying to distinguish between the two can set off an argument usually associated with politics or religion. This is so true! ROFL OP, if I was to tell you that I need to be able to trust your: judgment and stability as a person; your ability to manage money, people and events that occur in your life; your emotional stability in adverse conditions; as well as no scat, permanent injury; children, animals and illegal activities; Would I then have no limits? Historically, the ancient Romans COULD .. cut off a slaves finger, hand ... or whatever, if it pleased the Owner. Or anything else, if it pleased the Owner. People were bought and sold on the auction block. Pure property! That honestly, isn't legal in our society ,,, so the word slave in a traditional sense is impossible. But with some limits, we can agree on a definition and role ... No? That is all you and your sub(s) or Dominant need to figure out between yourselves. And BTW ... being called a slave does turn me on tremendously, when said by a beautifully attractive Lady, in an intimate situations. So perhaps it is all really pet names, and the level of devotion demonstrated to the Mistress or Master. Along with personal preference. No?
_____________________________
Got my second paddle! Finally! :-) Heck I had one in 2010 .. now in 2013 another! Yes you can say, i am just a gifted slow learner!
|