PeggyO
Posts: 129
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: robertolapiedra Hello PeggyO. In Japan most people would assume that you are part of a Dojo or a training program of sorts for management positions in a big firm and this, with public pushups, sit-ups or "recitations". Here? as you say, lost a bet, dare etc, (as long as you are not in an evening gown!) 'if' it is pushups and the like. That is far different from getting out of car buck naked and running in broad daylight to a mail box to post the doms mail. I think you know how ultra humiliating this is for a japanese in his/her culture. You would not see this in a more classical japanese style. As you said, the punishment is immediate most of the time. It is done to obtain Damocles Sword effect. The 'submissive' knowing that he/she would be immediately reprimanded on the spot develops strong self discipline skills. But stripping you down and breaking out the flogger? Or having you run naked in public? That is 'normally' out of the question for public humiliation. Good luck with your 'apprenticeship'. RL. Edit: word missing Hello, I'm sure not where the stripped naked in public example comes from. For me that isn't public humiliation - that's how to get someone arrested. I have never been asked to do anything that is outside my ethical boundaries or that would get me thrown in jail. I have been asked plenty of times to do things outside my comfort zone, but never anything such as the examples in your post. Certainly in my relationship it would be considered a huge breach of etiquette for him to strip me naked and take a flogger to me. That would be considered sexual in nature; we do not have a sexual relationship and sexual issues are considered off-limits within the bounds of our relationship. One of the things to point out about the Japanese model is that telling the Teacher "no" terminates the relationship. You are expected to obey orders to the best of your ability without questioning them. If you do something wrong you are expected to take ownership of it and not place the blame on something or someone else. The moral to the story is that you had better really know the person you are allowing to teach you if you choose this model of relationship, since it has a very strong TPE element to it. The differences, at least in my situation as uchideshi, is there are things about my life that are not considered appropriate areas for him to have authority in. My career, my finances and my sex life are my own responsibility. My work responsibilities supercede my responsibilities to the house. Otherwise, my responsibilities to the house are first priority. This can lead to issues in terms of meeting people because some want a level of relationship and time commitment that I am not prepared to offer. However, the reward for the commitment and work this type of model has been, for me, a huge amount of personal growth and a real boost in my self esteem - which needed it. But it's also a path that, in the eyes of people with a Western sensibility, is a very harsh one without the "niceties" that we expect from relationships that have a high level of emotional connection and energy. Be well, Peggy
|