SanDieganMichael
Posts: 56
Joined: 10/3/2006 From: San Diego Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CitizenCane Looking through these responses it seems clear to me that there are various types of limits, with different reasons for respecting them. I would categorize them, broadly, as 1) Moral/ethical limits- for instance, most would consider commiting murder a hard limit. 2) Physical safety limits- for instance, a person with a heart condition is probably not a good candidate for cart-horse pony play. 3) Mental/emotional safety limits- persons with a history of trauma, for instance, have reactions to certain stimuli that are not within their ability to control, and these stimuli may cause further damage. 4) Things that are scary, icky, painful or unpleasant. It's often difficult to discriminate category 4 from the rest, but it's the one that many dominiants are focused on, as it seems to suggest a resistance to their control. Most subs, on the other hand, are generally referring to one or more of the other three categories when they talk about limits. I would suggest that as a purely practical matter, no good can come of violating any of the first three kinds of limits. Such actions will almost certainly rebound negatively on the violator. As for the fourth, it's tempting sometimes to force these boundaries, but doing so requires, both ethically and practically, absolute (and justified) certainty that the dom has correctly categoriezed the limit, and that violating it will not itself transform the limit into one of the first three types. This kind of assurance is hard to come by in the real world. Superbly written, well defined and well spoken (typed anyways). I’d like to think on one of my good days I could have put this so succinctly.
|