RE: Reality Check (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


AAkasha -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 6:12:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: realist

quote:

What ever happened to tolerance? I thought that this community, both online and otherwise was based in this theory? Your kink is your kink is your kink...at least that was what I was taught...Maybe generations of BDSMer's are wrong?

Who cares if a ProDomme comes here? If she's open about it, and the fellows/ladies that come to her know it, who cares? It's valid, it's just different than what you do.


The average Pro-Domme rate is $250 per hour. That seems fairly universal insofar as I've read. I've seen ads as high as $1500 for an evening, plus expenses.

Please show me any provided service worth that rate.

Such gross excess pricing is exploitative, simple as that. If this provided service were in fact derived of a valid fetish, these Pro-Dommes would have a much more important reason to provide these services than financial gain. If such a valid fetish on their part, were present, the financial aspect and rates would vary greatly. Ever see a $25 an hour Pro-Domme? Yeah, me either. I conclude they don't have a secondary reason to provide a valued service then, and since all they want is money, their prices clearly show that sole aim.

I tolerate all valid and ethical fetishes, and enjoy several myself. I do not tolerate unethical exploitation of vulnerable people seeking BDSM and D/s.

The spectrum of acceptable kink ends abruptly at criminal, dishonest, unethical, and exploitative practices.

I disagree that "Your kink is your kink is your kink" and legally and ethically speaking, anything goes.


A few other things come to mind about how ridiculous your logic is here.

So you think pro femdoms are only in it for financial gain? (some may be, but I believe they are the minority and get out of the business fast). Do you think it is impossible to enjoy something, and charge money for it?

I enjoy what I do for a living, and I work in a client-based business. If I were not making any money, I'd still be doing the same type of things for pleasure (writing, primarily) or as a volunteer. The fact that I enjoy writing, but I also make money writing, does that mean I am expoiting others?

Should I only charge $25 an hour, because I actually enjoy what I do? Or should I charge the *fair market value* for my skills and to cover my overhead? My hourly rate is based on my level of experience and skill set. I love what I do, but I'm sure as hell not going to do it for $25 an hour.

And for the pro femdoms that are also active in their local communities, attending events with personal partners and in an active BDSM relationship in addition to their business -- are you suggesting they "fake" all of that just to keep up an image? It seems like an awful lot of work, creating an entire life as a lie, just to fool potential customers.

Akasha


Actual professional dominants are few and far between. I believe what the OP is referring to is a when Suzy TrailerTrash, who bought a flogger last week, is now calling herself a ProDomme and demanding $250 /hr to prance around and pose and act like she has the world's worst case of PMS.

No one is suggesting you do something only for the money. However, I think the successful pros understand that it IS a business and you are there to fulfill the needs/wants/fantasies of your client. It's possible independently wealthy artists can work only to please themselves. The vast majority of people don't have that option. You work to meet your client’s expectations. Or, your business fails.

And that just sits wrong with most Mistress Suzy TrailerTrashs that I am aware of. They think it should be all about them, and getting both their needs and wallets filled.

If I were consulting a male sub about what to look for in a proDomme? I would expect that she has some primo dungeon space with tools and furniture, a good number of techniques that she has mastered and a better than passing understanding of psychology. Again, not nearly as many professionals out there as you may think.





Mistress Suzy Trailer Trash gets no repeat business, first of all -- so the chances of making a living are even more slim.
And aren't men who are willing to shell out $250/hr willing to do any research at all? Would they hire a marketing consultant, for example, in the "high end" bracket -- and not ask to see a portfolio of past work? A submissive can inquire about dungeon space, years in the business, equipment available, etc. He can change his mind once he drives up, and sees it's a "trailer". If he walks in and she is standing there in a leather skirt with one whip, he can turn around and walk away.

The professionals that have a clientele, a playspace, a reputation and gear are right in charging $250/hr or whatever the market will bear. If subs don't want to pay they won't.

The "scammers" you talk about -- charging $250 a session -- jump in and out of the business fast. They just want to make some quick cash and figure it's a way to do it. But that discredits all the professional out there that have done it for years and make a living off of it.

Why are we protecting men who make stupid mistakes, like sending cash to femdoms online as a "tribute" to talk to them (who do it, then complain later)? There is a sucker born every minute, and ALL areas of business are taking advantage of suckers right now on the net. Not just BDSM people.

Akasha




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 6:15:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

Have a need to make yourself feel better by looking down your nose at people who don't call themselves 24/7?


Ms Silvie,
Absolutely not. By no means did I want to come off as superior. Quite the contrary, I describe myself as fortunate to have found someone compatible. I hope that regardless of the relationship anyone happens to be in that it is the most important thing to them. In my mind it should be always considered.
I think you should consider a spouse, children, and everything else you deem important enough to identify, when you have to make life decisions. I believe that it helps ascertain what is REALLY important when you make a decision based on an outside factor. To us that outside factor is us. That's what makes it "elevated".
Realist didn't believe anything in his life should be elevated to that level. I disagree. I think you should have a goal in your relationship to have it elevated. Call it marriage, call it 25/7 lifestyle, call it anything you like. I don't believe it is a superior to have that as a goal or to make life decisions on the basis of having that aspect of my life elevated and always considered.
I question why anyone wouldn't want that in a partner, 24/7.


I apologize if I implied you were coming off as superior. I didn't intend to imply that about you. I was just using "you" in a general sense.

That said, I DO see this with many people. You can see it in any lifestyle. I'm not just a audiophile... I've got the biggest, baddest most powerful sound system in creation. I designed it all myself, even my closets have better fidelity than your living room! I'm not just a bdsm enthusiast.... I'm the biggest baddest, most hard core 24/7 bdsmer you'll ever meet, much more legit than you are! Why, I even have black leather bath towels!

That's wrong. That's compensating for something. That is not being supportive of people who do not have your level of interest. And, based on what I see online, that is a big problem. It's not with every single person, but it's still a big problem. Someone disagrees with you? Flame 'em, they aren't real. That didn't work? Call them a sock puppet! Obviously they can't be making a legitimate point. You've seen it all. And it's not right.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 6:30:23 PM)

quote:

That said, I DO see this with many people. You can see it in any lifestyle. I'm not just a audiophile... I've got the biggest, baddest most powerful sound system in creation. I designed it all myself, even my closets have better fidelity than your living room! I'm not just a bdsm enthusiast.... I'm the biggest baddest, most hard core 24/7 bdsmer you'll ever meet, much more legit than you are! Why, I even have black leather bath towels!


Agree 100%! I know that people are more hardcore than us, more formal than us, more everything. Perfection is a goal to strive but doing so you must know that ultimately it is unobtainable. But striving for, or desiring anything less dooms you to be satisfied with less.

I believe that part of that striving is including your relationship into any decision that comes to you. In that regard it is not a matter of degrees. It is here that I disagree with the OP saying that a relationship as a married spouse or as either half of a lifestyle M/s relationship shouldn't be elevated to priority status. I say is must. Not having achieved or representing perfection, but because it is a desired goal. The semantics of 24/7 label aside, I'll ask again - why would anyone have anything less as a goal for any real time, live in relationship?




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 6:33:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
Mistress Suzy Trailer Trash gets no repeat business, first of all -- so the chances of making a living are even more slim.
And aren't men who are willing to shell out $250/hr willing to do any research at all? Would they hire a marketing consultant, for example, in the "high end" bracket -- and not ask to see a portfolio of past work? A submissive can inquire about dungeon space, years in the business, equipment available, etc. He can change his mind once he drives up, and sees it's a "trailer". If he walks in and she is standing there in a leather skirt with one whip, he can turn around and walk away.

The professionals that have a clientele, a playspace, a reputation and gear are right in charging $250/hr or whatever the market will bear. If subs don't want to pay they won't.

The "scammers" you talk about -- charging $250 a session -- jump in and out of the business fast. They just want to make some quick cash and figure it's a way to do it. But that discredits all the professional out there that have done it for years and make a living off of it.

Why are we protecting men who make stupid mistakes, like sending cash to femdoms online as a "tribute" to talk to them (who do it, then complain later)? There is a sucker born every minute, and ALL areas of business are taking advantage of suckers right now on the net. Not just BDSM people.

Akasha



It costs NOTHING for The Queen of the Trailer Park to be a proDomme. She can schedule an hour or two in between what ever else she does for money. And it costs nothing for her to sit around on the computer and brag herself up as a "true lifestyler".

As far as male subs, why not keep blaiming the victim, you say? I personally am not sure how women can get into a position where they are raped. There are plenty of sites regarding personal safety and how to minimize your risks. So, if a woman is raped it is her fault? I'm sorry, that seems to be a m/f thing. Females have a bad experience... poor darling, mean people taking advantage of her, let's warn everyone in we know about him so it never happens again.

Male has a bad experience... serves 'em right.




SweetDommes -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 6:38:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie

It costs NOTHING for The Queen of the Trailer Park to be a proDomme. She can schedule an hour or two in between what ever else she does for money. And it costs nothing for her to sit around on the computer and brag herself up as a "true lifestyler".

As far as male subs, why not keep blaiming the victim, you say? I personally am not sure how women can get into a position where they are raped. There are plenty of sites regarding personal safety and how to minimize your risks. So, if a woman is raped it is her fault? I'm sorry, that seems to be a m/f thing. Females have a bad experience... poor darling, mean people taking advantage of her, let's warn everyone in we know about him so it never happens again.

Male has a bad experience... serves 'em right.



You know, I was going to stay out of it, but I cannot allow this. You are comparing two totally different things. Being raped is something that happens, unfortunately it will always happen, because sometimes, no matter what you do to avoid it, someone else out there is stronger/faster/more whatever than you and forces him/herself upon you. Getting scammed is in no way the same. Yeah, it sucks, yeah, people shouldn't do it, but NO ONE goes up to them, puts a gun against their head and says "hey, give me your cash" during a scam - that is a robbery not a scam. No one is forcing anyone to send money in advance or send tributes or whatever exactly it is that happens during these online scams. It is in no way, shape, or form anything like someone being raped.




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 7:12:22 PM)

Not really. Become victimized by anything, and chances are, there is someone there to demonize you for being the victim. Because, to them, it's your fault. Get scammed in the stock market? You should have done your research better. Buy a lemon of a car? You should have known that that engine is prone to valve problems. Some one promised to move in with you and wasted your time and energy? Your problem entirely, you should have seen that coming.

You can see why I don't buy that line of thought one bit. You can always look back and say missed things that, in retrospect, told you something may not have been all above the board. Do you deserve everything you got as a result? No, not at all. The people perpetuating the fraud are the ones responsible.




SweetDommes -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 7:15:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie

Not really. Become victimized by anything, and chances are, there is someone there to demonize you for being the victim. Because, to them, it's your fault. Get scammed in the stock market? You should have done your research better. Buy a lemon of a car? You should have known that that engine is prone to valve problems. Some one promised to move in with you and wasted your time and energy? Your problem entirely, you should have seen that coming.

You can see why I don't buy that line of thought one bit. You can always look back and say missed things that, in retrospect, told you something may not have been all above the board. Do you deserve everything you got as a result? No, not at all. The people perpetuating the fraud are the ones responsible.



You compared a violent crime to a non-violent crime - they are nothing alike. Then when challenged about your comparison, suddenly all of your examples are non-violent in nature.

You also seem to have missed that I did not dispute the fact that it is the scammer and not the scammee at fault - my problem with your post is that you compared two entirely different things and expected people to buy it as a justified comparison.




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 7:22:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

That said, I DO see this with many people. You can see it in any lifestyle. I'm not just a audiophile... I've got the biggest, baddest most powerful sound system in creation. I designed it all myself, even my closets have better fidelity than your living room! I'm not just a bdsm enthusiast.... I'm the biggest baddest, most hard core 24/7 bdsmer you'll ever meet, much more legit than you are! Why, I even have black leather bath towels!


Agree 100%! I know that people are more hardcore than us, more formal than us, more everything. Perfection is a goal to strive but doing so you must know that ultimately it is unobtainable. But striving for, or desiring anything less dooms you to be satisfied with less.

I believe that part of that striving is including your relationship into any decision that comes to you. In that regard it is not a matter of degrees. It is here that I disagree with the OP saying that a relationship as a married spouse or as either half of a lifestyle M/s relationship shouldn't be elevated to priority status. I say is must. Not having achieved or representing perfection, but because it is a desired goal. The semantics of 24/7 label aside, I'll ask again - why would anyone have anything less as a goal for any real time, live in relationship?


I agree with your points also. The issue to me has never been wanting to improve what you have or what you do. That is part of what people should do. The problem is when a person try to elevate your situation and give it a false validity by giving it some kind of label that to me, really doesn't mean much. It's the whole "edgier, leaner, more valid than THOU" that I take exception to. I don't see that the OP indicated that a relationship as a married spouse or as either half of a lifestyle M/s relationship shouldn't be elevated to priority status. Just that "24/7" is a sort of meaningless term. No one talks about a 24/7 marriage, 24/7 kids or a 24/7 cat or dog. It's a term that many people use to try to give themselves a falsely inflated status.




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 7:29:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes


quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie

Not really. Become victimized by anything, and chances are, there is someone there to demonize you for being the victim. Because, to them, it's your fault. Get scammed in the stock market? You should have done your research better. Buy a lemon of a car? You should have known that that engine is prone to valve problems. Some one promised to move in with you and wasted your time and energy? Your problem entirely, you should have seen that coming.

You can see why I don't buy that line of thought one bit. You can always look back and say missed things that, in retrospect, told you something may not have been all above the board. Do you deserve everything you got as a result? No, not at all. The people perpetuating the fraud are the ones responsible.



You compared a violent crime to a non-violent crime - they are nothing alike. Then when challenged about your comparison, suddenly all of your examples are non-violent in nature.

You also seem to have missed that I did not dispute the fact that it is the scammer and not the scammee at fault - my problem with your post is that you compared two entirely different things and expected people to buy it as a justified comparison.


No, I picked rape as an example because I knew it would be an example that gets some attention. Why don't subs just use some common sense not fall victim to a scam? Why do some people get into situations where they are raped? And why do some of us view one situation differently than another.




SweetDommes -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 7:31:57 PM)

I view them differently because I had someone break into my dorm room while I was asleep - I had the windows closed and locked, I had the door shut and locked - what the hell did I do wrong? Did I not use common sense? You are comparing what I went through to someone who was taken advantage of because he was thinking with his dick instead of his brain. I resent the comparison because it is TOTALLY invalid.




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 8:06:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

I view them differently because I had someone break into my dorm room while I was asleep - I had the windows closed and locked, I had the door shut and locked - what the hell did I do wrong? Did I not use common sense? You are comparing what I went through to someone who was taken advantage of because he was thinking with his dick instead of his brain. I resent the comparison because it is TOTALLY invalid.


I'm sorry, was I referring specifically to your experience somewhere in this thread? Or are you claiming that your experience represents all situations of rape?




SweetDommes -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 8:21:23 PM)

I'm stating that your comparison was invalid because you compared two entirely different things - violent crimes do not compare to non-violent crimes. You are still trying to claim that they are comparable and they AREN'T. When I stated my position, you pulled possible misjudgements/lack of foresight/etc into the discussion and I'm showing you that there are situations of rape where there was no misjudgement or lack of foresight; with rape, walking alone in a dark alley = lack of foresight, being asleep in a locked dorm room does not = lack of foresight; with getting scammed, sending money to someone that you don't know at all = lack of foresight pretty much every time. The two are not comparable. I don't care why you picked rape, it was a very poor and insensitive choice.




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 8:37:11 PM)

When it comes to "blame the victim", they compare perfectly well. Or are you not able to see that? I did not make any specific examples, you did. And you further go on to imply that some rapes ARE more the fault of the person who was raped. Who benefits from THAT viewpoint? Do you treat those situations differently? You obviously think of them differently. Who feels better after they make a value judgement of "you were asking for it"? And why?

So forget about that example if you can't see the comparison. Grandma gets scammed out of her money by some fast talking stock broker. Her fault? She should know better? She wanted to get something for herself, she wasn't donating to charity. How is that different than a male sub getting scammed by a female dom?


quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

I'm stating that your comparison was invalid because you compared two entirely different things - violent crimes do not compare to non-violent crimes. You are still trying to claim that they are comparable and they AREN'T. When I stated my position, you pulled possible misjudgements/lack of foresight/etc into the discussion and I'm showing you that there are situations of rape where there was no misjudgement or lack of foresight; with rape, walking alone in a dark alley = lack of foresight, being asleep in a locked dorm room does not = lack of foresight; with getting scammed, sending money to someone that you don't know at all = lack of foresight pretty much every time. The two are not comparable. I don't care why you picked rape, it was a very poor and insensitive choice.





SweetDommes -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 8:54:21 PM)

Forget it, you are still missing my point (which never was that "blaming the victim" is appropriate for any crime) and you obviously will never get why your comparison was so incredibly insensitive to some people.




AAkasha -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 9:13:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

Forget it, you are still missing my point (which never was that "blaming the victim" is appropriate for any crime) and you obviously will never get why your comparison was so incredibly insensitive to some people.


I'm not even going to respond to it, because others have pointed out what a ridiculous comparison it is. She made that grand statement knowing it would totally take the heat off the original point of the post and get this on a hot button issue. Good job. But she didn't even address that a guy spending $250 an hour to see a pro domme should probably do a little research, just as he would with any service he was purchasing.

The fact that she can even compare a guy getting swindled on the net into sending "a tribute" to someone he has never met to someone being raped is ridiculous. Nice way to change the topic, though.

Akasha




AAkasha -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 9:32:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

That said, I DO see this with many people. You can see it in any lifestyle. I'm not just a audiophile... I've got the biggest, baddest most powerful sound system in creation. I designed it all myself, even my closets have better fidelity than your living room! I'm not just a bdsm enthusiast.... I'm the biggest baddest, most hard core 24/7 bdsmer you'll ever meet, much more legit than you are! Why, I even have black leather bath towels!


Agree 100%! I know that people are more hardcore than us, more formal than us, more everything. Perfection is a goal to strive but doing so you must know that ultimately it is unobtainable. But striving for, or desiring anything less dooms you to be satisfied with less.

I believe that part of that striving is including your relationship into any decision that comes to you. In that regard it is not a matter of degrees. It is here that I disagree with the OP saying that a relationship as a married spouse or as either half of a lifestyle M/s relationship shouldn't be elevated to priority status. I say is must. Not having achieved or representing perfection, but because it is a desired goal. The semantics of 24/7 label aside, I'll ask again - why would anyone have anything less as a goal for any real time, live in relationship?


I agree with your points also. The issue to me has never been wanting to improve what you have or what you do. That is part of what people should do. The problem is when a person try to elevate your situation and give it a false validity by giving it some kind of label that to me, really doesn't mean much. It's the whole "edgier, leaner, more valid than THOU" that I take exception to. I don't see that the OP indicated that a relationship as a married spouse or as either half of a lifestyle M/s relationship shouldn't be elevated to priority status. Just that "24/7" is a sort of meaningless term. No one talks about a 24/7 marriage, 24/7 kids or a 24/7 cat or dog. It's a term that many people use to try to give themselves a falsely inflated status.


Someone cannot be actively grandstanding (giving themselves a falsely inflated status) without TWO people participaing. The person who is talking about their lifestyle, and the one that choose to interpret that as superiority statement. The "criteria" for "better" is not established -- it's not cut and dry like "who has more money." It's all based on a person's interpretation of what *a better lifestyle is*. Some people might think 24/7 bdsmers are at the bottom of the food chain, you know that? Because they don't think it's functional, or it's not balanced. Or any host of reasons why it is "less than."

How come some people get all offended and bent out of shape, claiming others are trying to "Act superior" or be "more kinky" or whatever? Obviously it affects *your* ego, so you are the one with the issue. What insecurities is it rattling? Why does it even matter if someone is higher on the "bdsm totem pole" (as if one exists -- and it apparently exists very clearly in YOUR mind)? Why does that threaten you? Why does that cause YOU any angst? Who cares? Is it jealousy? Seriously, why do you let it bother you? Why do you interpret it as grandstanding, when for all you know it is enthusiasm?

More importantly, why do you *choose* to believe that "more" or "24/7" or "insert whatever it is you think is grandstanding" makes that person better? I don't get that feeling at all when I hear people talk about how "into" the scene they are. I could really care less. I know there are a lot of people that are way more "lifestyle" than me, and a lot that are about the same and a lot that are less into it. Who cares? How does that affect my life one bit? Do I get a lesser parking space or something?

In fact, I bet a lot of people who are weekend kinksters (but really do love it) or casual players with a toe in "the scene" and the rest in vanilla don't see these people as grandstanding or "better than" -- think about it. The probably see them as fruitcakes or extremists, or shrug it off and say "whatever, I don't get that, but hey works for you..." Why are these kinky people not "offended" by their apparent grandstanding, but you are?

If these kinky people started coming online and talking very passionately about how their kink/vanilla life is SO integrated, runs SO smoothly, how they switch gears with ease, how they have the most passionate weekends but none of that nonsense drama, or strange "scene parties" ...well, they would be "better than" too, right? They would be putting down everyone, because they measure success in a different way?

I believe these casually kinky people probably would have that exact attitude and it would rattle feathers. The point is, they aren't on a newsgroup about BDSM because it's just not that big of a deal to them.

The bottom line is -- you have a choice about how someone's attitude affects you.

Akasha






AthenaLourdes -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 9:37:19 PM)

quote:

even the majority. In fantasyland, people give up their lives,




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 9:57:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

You are comparing what I went through to someone who was taken advantage of because he was thinking with his dick instead of his brain. I resent the comparison because it is TOTALLY invalid.


So thinking with your dick and not your brain means..... what?

followed by:

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

Forget it, you are still missing my point (which never was that "blaming the victim" is appropriate for any crime) and you obviously will never get why your comparison was so incredibly insensitive to some people.


Perhaps you are trying to say that some crimes are more traumatic than others. If so, then say that. I doubt anyone will argue THAT.

I understand people get into situations that they do not intend to get into. Sometimes, they could have/should have done things differently. Sometimes, they could not have done anything differently. It's a mistake to say the person wasn't a victim. When you experience someone giving you the attitude of "maybe it was your fault", and I have, then I think you either come to understand just how counter productive that attidude really is for ANY situation. Or, perhaps you don't.




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (5/30/2005 10:33:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

That said, I DO see this with many people. You can see it in any lifestyle. I'm not just a audiophile... I've got the biggest, baddest most powerful sound system in creation. I designed it all myself, even my closets have better fidelity than your living room! I'm not just a bdsm enthusiast.... I'm the biggest baddest, most hard core 24/7 bdsmer you'll ever meet, much more legit than you are! Why, I even have black leather bath towels!


Agree 100%! I know that people are more hardcore than us, more formal than us, more everything. Perfection is a goal to strive but doing so you must know that ultimately it is unobtainable. But striving for, or desiring anything less dooms you to be satisfied with less.

I believe that part of that striving is including your relationship into any decision that comes to you. In that regard it is not a matter of degrees. It is here that I disagree with the OP saying that a relationship as a married spouse or as either half of a lifestyle M/s relationship shouldn't be elevated to priority status. I say is must. Not having achieved or representing perfection, but because it is a desired goal. The semantics of 24/7 label aside, I'll ask again - why would anyone have anything less as a goal for any real time, live in relationship?


I agree with your points also. The issue to me has never been wanting to improve what you have or what you do. That is part of what people should do. The problem is when a person try to elevate your situation and give it a false validity by giving it some kind of label that to me, really doesn't mean much. It's the whole "edgier, leaner, more valid than THOU" that I take exception to. I don't see that the OP indicated that a relationship as a married spouse or as either half of a lifestyle M/s relationship shouldn't be elevated to priority status. Just that "24/7" is a sort of meaningless term. No one talks about a 24/7 marriage, 24/7 kids or a 24/7 cat or dog. It's a term that many people use to try to give themselves a falsely inflated status.


Someone cannot be actively grandstanding (giving themselves a falsely inflated status) without TWO people participaing. The person who is talking about their lifestyle, and the one that choose to interpret that as superiority statement. The "criteria" for "better" is not established -- it's not cut and dry like "who has more money." It's all based on a person's interpretation of what *a better lifestyle is*. Some people might think 24/7 bdsmers are at the bottom of the food chain, you know that? Because they don't think it's functional, or it's not balanced. Or any host of reasons why it is "less than."


I don't believe you can posture and grandstand without an audience. That is not to say the audience must be in agreement with the grandstander at all. They can all be laughing silently at said poser.

quote:


How come some people get all offended and bent out of shape, claiming others are trying to "Act superior" or be "more kinky" or whatever? Obviously it affects *your* ego, so you are the one with the issue. What insecurities is it rattling? Why does it even matter if someone is higher on the "bdsm totem pole" (as if one exists -- and it apparently exists very clearly in YOUR mind)? Why does that threaten you? Why does that cause YOU any angst? Who cares? Is it jealousy? Seriously, why do you let it bother you? Why do you interpret it as grandstanding, when for all you know it is enthusiasm?


You believe it effects my ego, you mean to say. My ego is much like an iceberg, as many people with their own little Titanic egos have discovered. It's pretty calm and quiet. There is much more to it than what is seen above the waterline. And it doesn't sink.

My hierarchy consists of "people who are truthful when they discuss what they do and their expereinces and what they find compelling" and "anyone else else". Simple, yes? I don't care if you are have been involved for years, been to every event, and re-did the carport in black leather last week or if you are someone who is just dealing with the idea that you maybe (just MAYBE) would like to try getting spanked (but not very hard) sometime. If you are honest about what you say and do, you have my respect.

quote:


More importantly, why do you *choose* to believe that "more" or "24/7" or "insert whatever it is you think is grandstanding" makes that person better? I don't get that feeling at all when I hear people talk about how "into" the scene they are. I could really care less. I know there are a lot of people that are way more "lifestyle" than me, and a lot that are about the same and a lot that are less into it. Who cares? How does that affect my life one bit? Do I get a lesser parking space or something?


No, I choose to believe that people who make all efforts to show people they are somehow better are usually compensating for something. I have no problem with enthusiasts. Enthusiasm is a wonderfully positive thing. I'm sure you have noticed a difference in enthusiasm and elitism however? Enthusiasts want to share their experience, introduce people to what they are passionate about. They encourage growth and questions. They are open with knowledge and not afraid to say they don't know something when they don't. Compare that to some of the elitist, fantasy based, close-minded people you know.

quote:


In fact, I bet a lot of people who are weekend kinksters (but really do love it) or casual players with a toe in "the scene" and the rest in vanilla don't see these people as grandstanding or "better than" -- think about it. The probably see them as fruitcakes or extremists, or shrug it off and say "whatever, I don't get that, but hey works for you..." Why are these kinky people not "offended" by their apparent grandstanding, but you are?


You don't believe I can tell the difference in casual people and less casual people? Extreme isn't the same as smug snobs who pretend to have some authority in an area where they don't know a whole lot.
quote:



If these kinky people started coming online and talking very passionately about how their kink/vanilla life is SO integrated, runs SO smoothly, how they switch gears with ease, how they have the most passionate weekends but none of that nonsense drama, or strange "scene parties" ...well, they would be "better than" too, right? They would be putting down everyone, because they measure success in a different way?


Functional vs. dysfunctional. I know the difference. I suspect you do too. I'm happy to hear about other people's success, even if it isn't something I would ever do. There are plenty of things I've done in my life that even I wouldn't recommend doing. But don't make an assumption that I'm intimidated, jealous, or fragile. I am willing to not always worry about offending someone else’s feelings. Someone uses bad logic, someone makes a mistake, someone needs to know that there are other views out there. I'm not shy.

quote:


The bottom line is -- you have a choice about how someone's attitude affects you.


I don't believe THAT was ever in disagreement. You, I and the rest of the forum have that choice. And we choose how to respond as well. It's just interesting to look back and see how each of us has used that choice, isn't it? Points of view get questioned, and my, aren't some people just a little overly reactive? And why?




Mercnbeth -> RE: Reality Check (5/31/2005 10:25:20 AM)

quote:

The problem is when a person try to elevate your situation and give it a false validity by giving it some kind of label that to me, really doesn't mean much.


Ms Silvie,
And that is THEIR problem. Anyone analyzing our situation and assigning "validity" based upon what we say or how we live, takes that upon themselves. There is no "validity" that we seek, no representation that we make that our situation and lifestyle is superior, and no comment that can be made that will change how we go about our life day to day. I appreciate that any label assigned has no meaning to you - it needn't and it shouldn't. But I don't understand why you should have a problem with ours or anyone else's self imposed label.

Just look at all the threads on this board concerning married partners not interested in the lifestyle seeking others to be with to satisfy their lifestyle desires. They rationalize it as not cheating when it doesn't include the physical sex act, using the traditional or Clinton's definition of sex. Few bring up the issue of their marriage being 24/7. Do you also have a problem with that representation?

Our posting to this thread was to challenge the notion that we don't exist. We do. We also know we are NOT unique. We are also adamant in our believe that when two people enter into a relationship, vanilla or flavored, that relationship must be important enough to each of them that it IS elevated and considered when making all other life decisions.

To us, it's very simple.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125