RE: Reality Check (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Alexander -> RE: Reality Check (5/31/2005 10:59:00 AM)

realist bud. your just wrong . So wrong.

24 /7 does exist, it may be a lame name and you may want to compare it to cars and disregard the comparison to marriage but your simply redefining your own rejection of something you refuse to believe exist anyway.

So I gotta ask you

Why in the world is it so important to you to quantify whether OTHER people are involved with thier slaves 24/7 or not? Clearly you aren't in a 24/7 relationship of whatever kind but your fascination with actually trying to define and reject the definitions of other people is fascinating.

Alexander




torybng -> RE: Reality Check (5/31/2005 12:28:11 PM)

i agree with much of what has been said about the dilution of reality in this small and esoteric population...and being at one of the narrowest ends, i feel it more being mature (not young and cute) cd(not a real gg, but have a feminine spirit) and sub (so many more of us) it is very frustrating for me....thanks for the forum




realist -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 4:23:08 AM)

quote:

The professionals that have a clientele, a playspace, a reputation and gear are right in charging $250/hr or whatever the market will bear. If subs don't want to pay they won't.


This ignores the fact that male submissives are a vulnerable lot. Often, they do not want social exposure and matching dominants can be hard to find. Often, these men will not approach women they know, wives, girlfriends etc because they have a difficult time accepting themselves. Men are "supposed" to be strong, powerful, commanding...and all that stereotypical culturally expected role business.

If someone has special needs and has trouble obtaining them, that in no way legitimates extreme profit taking.

We're not talking high end consultation here. We're not talking about field research, university degrees, employees and workspace overhead and equipment upkeep. We're talking about spanking, flogging, humiliation and other things hardly comparable to the business world.

ProDomming at $250 is a rip off. It's ass beating and humiliation. There is zero dollar overhead for that. The entire business exists because these submissive men are easy to exploit, and so they are.

Hardly a case of being able to shop around in a free open competitive market.




realist -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 4:44:29 AM)

quote:

Why in the world is it so important to you to quantify whether OTHER people are involved with thier slaves 24/7 or not? Clearly you aren't in a 24/7 relationship of whatever kind but your fascination with actually trying to define and reject the definitions of other people is fascinating.


There are many things in the world that are absurd. Star Trek fans learning to speak Klingon, Bigfoot sighting claimants, UFO abductees (my favorite). Then there are lesser but perhaps more annoying claims and associated mythologies out there. How about Harley riders who think their bike makes them a 1%er bad ass road warrior, but only on weekends away from their office cubicle? Have you never met one of these people? Have you never been looked down upon by some person lost in a personal mythology? Does it not occur to you that these sorts of mythic ploys disenfranchise and repel many good folks from given social avenues?

How many times have we all seen someone tout there BDSM supremacy? A harder-core-than-you type player, a no limits 24/7 slave and master who's sexualities are so far out there that they have no off switch, no downtime, no shred of their existence that is not directy, purely, totally, BDSM and D/s.

The news for them is simple: sexuality is a part of lfe, life is not a part of sexuality.

Where is the line between sexual addiction and 24/7? Where is the line between obsessive compulsive disorder and 24/7?

How come these questions are not online at all among the those who make these extreme claims?

Why is being well grounded with many life pursuits seen as being a "lesser player"?

It is not wrong to question these myths and their impacts. I can, and have, and will continue to question anything I like.

quote:

Clearly you aren't in a 24/7 relationship of whatever kind but your fascination with actually trying to define and reject the definitions of other people is fascinating.


You know absolutely zero about my relationship. You suppose based upon the fact that I have critically questioned a sacred cow of yours. You dislike the questions I pose and the things I think, so you go out of your way to think the least of me, my lovelife and my experience with BDSM and D/s.

Cite evidence, back your claim.

I define things like 24/7 exactly as they appear and indicate themselves to be. 24/7 means all day, all week. It implies all the time, constant, with no downtime. But common sense shows that most of life is not sexual, not BDSM related, not D/s related. How does one drive a car as a BDSMer? How does one parallel park or grocery shop as a dom or sub? How does one parent their children as a top or bottom or foot fetishist? How does one merely concentrate without temporarily disregarding BDSM and their D/s relationship?

To claim anyone can and does live like that is pretending.

What evidence would show an observer that a BDSM reality is at work while one drives? They appear to only be legally operating a car in a safe efficient manner. But the claims hereabouts are akin to said driving being just the outward "vanilla" world's daily needs at work while a greater eternal internal BDSM reality is at work, invisible to everyone else with no outward evidence is really what's going on. What is the evidence? Testimony of the claimant, only, in spite of contrary observable evidence.

I claim online mythology rampant in this community spawns and encourages people to participate in such mythology. What you are failing to see in me is that my real life BDSM experiences need no such pretending and by trying to loft BDSM way out of proportion, you actually cheapen it down to mere pretending.

All of that, begs commentary.





EmeraldSlave2 -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 5:31:22 AM)

You seem to be equating "people who want to be 24/7" with "people who put themselves on a high horse."

The truth is, those are very different things. People can and are 24/7, people can and are extreme players, people can and are have thorough long term relationships- and NOT talk about how bdsm is the be all and end all, how more wonderful bdsm is, etc etc etc.




realist -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 5:51:55 AM)

quote:

Why can't it be elevated above all else? When are you not married? Why can't you function as a father, biker, employee, etc., and still be married? Of course you are. You're a married biker, married employee, married parent to your children. Do you need to make the married part "dormant" while you function as any of these other things? In order to function as one of these things you need to "omit" the other? I don't find it necessary to omit any to function as the other.

Prior to beth, I was still dominant. I had a dominant personality. I wasn't a dominant part time. It was part of everything I did. It was why I was so confident to find someone like beth who was just as confident and who interjected her submissive personality into every part of her life; as a mother, a daughter, an employee, etc. Together we make a Master/slave relationship. Soon our relationship will also be recognized and able to use the label husband/wife. When that happens she will be a slave wife, slave mother, slave whatever; as I will be husband master, etc.

The Master and slave "elevation" is important. It is the recognized difference between submissive and dominant. It indicates possession and being possessed. Once achieved it is important to elevate it above all other labels. To us, it is that important. It deserves elevation. Why would you not want that in your position? Why wouldn't everyone what that to be the cornerstone of their relationship? Why wouldn't you want your partner to be the most important "elevated" aspect of your life? Children go away, they grow up with spouse and lives of their own. You would hope for their happiness, they put their spouse as their "24/7" elevated priority. Jobs, and other responsibilities change. Call it 24/7 or call it anything you like; but the goal in any relationship should be elevated as a priority.

Fortunately for me - for US - it is. I couldn't care less what you want to label it, or if you want to deny it's existence. It IS.


This is a good post Merc, I'll break down individual questions for clarity.

quote:

Why can't it be elevated above all else?


Because life has many many aspects, any of which could be arbitrarily elevated to supremacy, but balance and an array of various successes can be had by temporarily elevating any given one to primacy. To be good at work, focus must be had, and temporarily omitting other aspects must be done to do so. Same with any avenue of life.

When my wife and I play, thoughts of jobs are not present, parenthood is temporarily dismissed, our "vanilla" marriage is temporarily discarded so that we may have our highly enjoyable D/s relationship primary for a time. I cease to actively be a biker or any other attribute or status I have, for a while, and I am then "bitch". I cannot be that bitch in any other avenue of life and succeed. I have to be various things at various times. I have to discard various aspects at various times.

Isn't that reasonable to do?

I assure you, it is very functional.

quote:

When are you not married? Why can't you function as a father, biker, employee, etc., and still be married?


If I am working, none of these aspects are active. They are not even in mind. I have to concentrate and have focus on my work. One cannot be all things at once.

If I am riding, I'd be dead if all my aspects were in mind while I needed to simply pay attention to traffic and deer and rain etc. Those other aspects are dormant for a time so one may rise to primacy and success may be had.

I am always married, always her sub, always a biker, a dad, a man, and many many other things. I do not live each of those all at once, eternally, in some mythic purity of heart and soul and mind. As I have said, life has many sides. Is it not a good thing to try and make the most of each side one has in life? So, I drop parenthood and marriage and BDSM to ride or work effectively. Alternately, I drop all those real world things when my wife and I "play". I get the most out of what I have in life this way. I do not pretend that one aspect trumps all the others so I can feel more pure, more hardcore, more bikerly, more fatherly, more successful financially than I really am.

Good reality needs no additional pretended status. Good BDSM and D/s need not be 24/7 and as such, be more than life itself is. Such exaggerations are not realistic anyhow, but what I'm saying here is that they're not neccesary in the first place.

quote:

Do you need to make the married part "dormant" while you function as any of these other things? In order to function as one of these things you need to "omit" the other? I don't find it necessary to omit any to function as the other.


Actually, I think you have to disregard marriage, BDSM, or any other unrelated thought or consideration simply to concentrate, or drive a car even. How about talking on a cell phone while driving? Not everyone can even do that, much less safely. Can they really, in the case of a 24/7 player, do those two things and be a dom or sub, in an active at that moment BDSM greater reality, with some portion of mind alloted to maintaining that reality while another reality demands complete attention?

Common sense indicates powerfully that no one can do all that and simply drive effectively.

There are then times when other thoughts and statuses must be dropped for a time to do something else.

Yes, one is still married, still a dom or sub, still a homeowner, or tall or short or fat or thin. They are 24/7 all those things, and in that, 24/7 comes to mean almost nothing.

24/7 is supposed to mean pure dedication, pure lifestyle adherence and pursuit, no downtime, no off switch. That, I am contending cannot and does not exist.

If you want to say 24/7 is not literal, ok, I'm fine with that, but shouldn't the term receive an adjustment so it becomes more accurate? We always hear about how new folks might not know so much about BDSM and D/s and we experienced ones should help them understand this preference realm better. Being accurate in our terms would hardly be a lessening of our preferences and statuses. Why can't we say 24/7 is really more like 6 hours a week of D/s and BDSM time and 3 days? Where's the harm in that? How does that cheapen BDSM and D/s or lessen it by doing this? I think it helps people see that BDSM and D/s and kink are just one part of life, one we'd all like to increase our activity in I'm sure, but one part among many others that are all rewarding in various ways.

If you define 24/7 to mean: we're always wanting our D/s relating mode, we always play along the same D/s lines, we never do "vanilla style sex" and we wish more of life was conducive to BDSM and D/s.......ok, I'm there with you 100%. There's often a formal and informal definition to everyday terms. Is 24/7 literal or is it the softer version I've cited above? In either case, the impossible literal or the less accurate latter one, again I ask why the term cannot be revised to reflect the real lives we all live.

quote:

Prior to beth, I was still dominant. I had a dominant personality. I wasn't a dominant part time. It was part of everything I did.


How do you drive a car, do banking, or grocery shop as a dominant? What evidence would be present that would illustrate the dominant character in operation?

I contend no such evidence exists because non-dominant oriented things simply do not have dominant character aspects pertaining to them.

One cannot parent as a dom or sub or crossdresser or biker, one parents as a parent, period.

I, personally, have a strong separation between my parenthood and my sexual preferences, BDSM, and D/s marriage aspect.

quote:

Soon our relationship will also be recognized and able to use the label husband/wife. When that happens she will be a slave wife, slave mother, slave whatever; as I will be husband master, etc.


Congratulations on your pending marriage [:D]

I wish you the greatest happiness and a lifetime marriage.

I must point out that when one has children, priorities change. Being a good parent rightfully demands all you have to give. It is not possible to parent as a sub or dom and children deserve to be brought up with focus on them and not at all overshadowed by any subjugation to other aspects of life, like D/s or BDSM.

It is impossible to attend a parant teacher meeting as sub and dom, it can only be done as parents. In taking that role, all others are dropped for the time being. Thus, again, common sense shows us 24/7 BDSM and D/s does not and cannot exist.

quote:

The Master and slave "elevation" is important. It is the recognized difference between submissive and dominant. It indicates possession and being possessed. Once achieved it is important to elevate it above all other labels. To us, it is that important. It deserves elevation.


Why?

Why when driving a car, why when at a parent teacher conference, why at the grocery store, why when simply concentrating or working? Would it not get in the way of simply being functional in those regards?

Why is this more important than all of the rest of life? Cannot one be in a thrillingly excellent BDSM and D/s relationship and also cherish the rest of life equally?

Why does all of life have to be subjugated and relegated down from this one thing?

Sexuality is part of life, life is not a part of sexuality.

Claiming otherwise bears no evidence in support and is supported only by personal claims. One can receive the same with regards to UFO abductees and all sorts of silly things.

quote:

Why would you not want that in your position?


A host of reasons.

1) Because we are high profile and do not want our BDSM preferences known socially or professionally.

2) Because we value family very highly and have ample focus on that aspect of life and would not welcome at all the idea of BDSM trumping that in importance.

3) Because so many aspects of life are as rewarding and at times even more rewarding than BDSM and D/s.

4) Because no aspect of our lives is so terrific and overly important that all else must be relegated to second, or lesser, place.

5) Because family and friends rightfully deserve to be held as primary when dealing with them.

6) Because sexuality is one part of life, it is not greater than all else in life.


Though I disagree with you on several things, you have written good posts and I think you're a sincere decent sort of guy. Please don't take my thoughts as any sort of denegration upon your thinking or relationship to Beth.

Have a good one [:)]






darkinshadows -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 6:00:26 AM)

quote:

quote:

When are you not married? Why can't you function as a father, biker, employee, etc., and still be married?


Well, your obviously not a woman then!
(Sorry - couldn't resist that[:D])

Actually - you are all these things. Just because your doing something different, doesn't mean your not all of the above. Working doesn't stop you from being a parent, driving the car doesn't make you any less of a man, and shopping doesn't make you any less married.
These are things that happen and you have in essence 'taken on'... so they are with you always. Theres nothing spiritual about it - nothing mythical - its just life.

Just because I might wear a sari to a wedding, or go to work, doesn't make me any less white. I am not conciously thinking I am white and that I behave white, but its still a 24 hour lifetime thang. Same as being a Man - or a woman, or gay, or a slave.

I am not into the language of 24/7 - its a silly word because it doesn't encompass what and who I am... but the reality is you are what you are, no matter what time of day it is and whatever you are doing.

Peace and Love




darkinshadows -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 6:07:05 AM)

quote:

24/7 is supposed to mean pure dedication, pure lifestyle adherence and pursuit, no downtime, no off switch. That, I am contending cannot and does not exist.


Who said that? You have said that - are others because I can't see it - Your placing an assumption on people. Sure, there may be people who think like that. But then, I like others beleive that God exists, but not all do. Some people think the sea is green, other see it as blue. Your not here to save the world, no ones asking it of you and you are making judgments on what people percieve 24/7 to be. You think its supposed to mean that, then fine.
I don't use it, i don't like it - but doesn't mean others must not use it because you think its silly. Only insecurities make people feel threatened by such an individual expression. You don't have to give into it, you don't have to submit to the term, but you can't expect people to follow what you think, because they aren't you, just as you aren'y them.

Peace and Love




Mercnbeth -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 7:22:44 AM)

quote:

Though I disagree with you on several things, you have written good posts and I think you're a sincere decent sort of guy. Please don't take my thoughts as any sort of denegration upon your thinking or relationship to Beth.


Realist,
Not at all. We will never agree, but that's doesn't prevent reciprocal respect. I'll take the sincere, but careful calling me "decent". I've worked at being in-decent for too long to give that up.

quote:

The news for them is simple: sexuality is a part of life, life is not a part of sexuality.
Sexuality IS life. Without it, life wouldn't be possible.

quote:

Where is the line between sexual addiction and 24/7? Where is the line between obsessive compulsive disorder and 24/7?
You say that like it's a bad thing. Can you have too much money? Same with sexuality, not in a way where you can't function, but to desire it with your partner over a long term again should be something to strive for not avoid. Seeking opportunities to be physical with each other, defined as basic as holding hands to tying her up to the nearest oak tree and ravishing her, is not a bad thing.

quote:

Why is being well grounded with many life pursuits seen as being a "lesser player"?
Who said this? Who is making you feel this way? In my own situation, it took many years to find someone compatible with my 24/7 desire. I didn't feel the people I was with along the way were "lesser players". In this lifestyle there is, as we say in the finance business, a "seat for every ass". The most difficult part is finding the seat appropriate for your ass. It doesn't make the seat any worse or better than anyone else's. It is my experience over the last 20 years of meeting people in the lifestyle that there is a much larger majority of people who don't desire or need a 24/7 relationship. It makes them no worse or better than those who do. From a practical standpoint, it's much easier to find a comfortable seat if you only need it for a short time.

Any additional posting of explanation would be redundant. I elevate the relationship beth and I share because it is that important. There are too many instances to mention where I make decisions based upon that elevation. They occur naturally and as such remembering them or documenting them would be similar in an attempt to document how many times I blink my eye in a day.

However I appreciate the opposing view of focusing on one aspect of life at a time as it occurs. I've always been more spontaneous in my approach to life and to the lifestyle. My dominance and my ownership of beth is like a program always running in the background of a PC. A reverse "pop-up" blocker, that instead of looking for pop ups to block is looking for opportunity, and then when having one, takes advantage of it. It's accounted for a LOT of fun. We also are VERY high profile, but under beth's gown she may be wearing remote vibrating panties with the control in the pocket of my tux vest. How better to make meeting our "Terminator" a/k/a Governor Arnold more memorable? I wouldn't want it any other way. If I scheduled "play time" or "scene time" with beth I could start to think of it as another business appointment. When we do scene I never pre-plan any aspect, from what furniture to what toy.

Anyway, as much as I tried I've still managed to be redundant. You'll have to trust my sincerity that you mentioned and accept that for us, there is elevation and there is 24/7. The invite to see it first hand still stands.




Oumae -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 7:30:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dark~angel

quote:

24/7 is supposed to mean pure dedication, pure lifestyle adherence and pursuit, no downtime, no off switch. That, I am contending cannot and does not exist.


Who said that? You have said that - are others because I can't see it - Your placing an assumption on people. Sure, there may be people who think like that. But then, I like others beleive that God exists, but not all do. Some people think the sea is green, other see it as blue. Your not here to save the world, no ones asking it of you and you are making judgments on what people percieve 24/7 to be. You think its supposed to mean that, then fine.
I don't use it, i don't like it - but doesn't mean others must not use it because you think its silly. Only insecurities make people feel threatened by such an individual expression. You don't have to give into it, you don't have to submit to the term, but you can't expect people to follow what you think, because they aren't you, just as you aren'y them.

Peace and Love




Here, as with the definitions discussion, it all comes down to the slant people take on the meanings of words and phrases. What 24/7 means to one is not quite the same it means to another and once they can explain where they are coming from then Yes, their definition may be right for them.

As dark~angel has said before in discussion... communication is the key... when talking to someone ask their understanding of a term and you will know where they are coming from it with it.

Oumae




AAkasha -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 9:44:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: realist

quote:

The professionals that have a clientele, a playspace, a reputation and gear are right in charging $250/hr or whatever the market will bear. If subs don't want to pay they won't.


This ignores the fact that male submissives are a vulnerable lot. Often, they do not want social exposure and matching dominants can be hard to find. Often, these men will not approach women they know, wives, girlfriends etc because they have a difficult time accepting themselves. Men are "supposed" to be strong, powerful, commanding...and all that stereotypical culturally expected role business.

If someone has special needs and has trouble obtaining them, that in no way legitimates extreme profit taking.

We're not talking high end consultation here. We're not talking about field research, university degrees, employees and workspace overhead and equipment upkeep. We're talking about spanking, flogging, humiliation and other things hardly comparable to the business world.

ProDomming at $250 is a rip off. It's ass beating and humiliation. There is zero dollar overhead for that. The entire business exists because these submissive men are easy to exploit, and so they are.

Hardly a case of being able to shop around in a free open competitive market.


Not all male submissives are a vulnerable lot. Speak for yourself there. Many are capable of doing research and making intelligent decisions about how they spend their money, and they are satisfied with what they get for it.

What per cent of professional dominants have no overhead? Give me an estimate in your opinion.

You have a serious lack of understanding of what the pro domination scene is, and instead focus on scam artists and bad eggs that will rip off any industry if they can; they are a small percentage of the OVERALL pro femdom market. They are probably simultaneously ripping off others on the net in OTHER ways.

I suggest you take a trip over to www.maxfisch.com and see how many of the men who post there regularly feel exploited. Oh, and while you are at it, tell the pro femdoms that you think $250/hr is exploitive (you said you got that from research, I think your number is also a bit silly because it varies greatly by *region*)

Also, do you think that someone who makes $250/hr pro domming works 8 hrs a day? How many hrs a week do you think?

And, how much repeat business do the scam artists make, the ones that really are faking it?

And, do you believe the rip off pro femdoms do it for a living? That is all the income they make?

You also never addressed the point I made regarding other "consultation" that costs $250/hr. I gave you an example and you ignored it.

And you also did not address the point I made about why don't we all charge $25 an hour if we love what we do?

The problem I see with your statements is that they show such a complete lack of understanding of a marketplace yet you claim to be an expert -- and I know it would simply take some short research on your part to find out how much you are wrong. You won't do that though. And, I think a lot of your claims are the same way -- based on your own ideas, with no real facts to back them up.

I look forward to your answers to my questions. They were not rhetorical.

Akasha




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 10:17:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
You have a serious lack of understanding of what the pro domination scene is, and instead focus on scam artists and bad eggs that will rip off any industry if they can; they are a small percentage of the OVERALL pro femdom market. They are probably simultaneously ripping off others on the net in OTHER ways.


Akasha, no one is ever going to argue that you do not understand professionalism, ethics, business plans, customer satisfaction and market prices. What you don't seem to understand is scammers. Say I have my trusty crop (thanx Farm and Fleet!) and my rust... er... trusty handcuffs (thanx Spencers!) Maybe I even have a black leather skirt (and it's crotchless, so you just know it's kinky!) I have no long term goals. I have no concern about repeat customers. But after an hour, I have $250! That's all I'm concerned about. I have no intention of making a living with it, it's gravy on top of some other source of income. Unless I find that elusive millionaire who is deeply into financial servitude, of course...

I don't think anyone wants to step up and say that these people are not out there calling themselves proDommes. Where we are probably going to disagree is percentage. I say, based on talking with lots of people who are both online and rl, looking at profiles, and just my general sense of what I observe, there are far, far more women just out for $250, or whatever amount of money, than there are women who want to make it a professional, rewarding service/business.

Don't feel you need to point out some of the very professional proDommes or direct me to Max's. I don't see anyone stating that there is no such thing as a professional professional Domme. For every one example of such you can give, I can give you 20 profiles that represent someone with PMS out for some spare cash.




AAkasha -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 10:21:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
You have a serious lack of understanding of what the pro domination scene is, and instead focus on scam artists and bad eggs that will rip off any industry if they can; they are a small percentage of the OVERALL pro femdom market. They are probably simultaneously ripping off others on the net in OTHER ways.


Akasha, no one is ever going to argue that you do not understand professionalism, ethics, business plans, customer satisfaction and market prices. What you don't seem to understand is scammers. Say I have my trusty crop (thanx Farm and Fleet!) and my rust... er... trusty handcuffs (thanx Spencers!) Maybe I even have a black leather skirt (and it's crotchless, so you just know it's kinky!) I have no long term goals. I have no concern about repeat customers. But after an hour, I have $250! That's all I'm concerned about. I have no intention of making a living with it, it's gravy on top of some other source of income. Unless I find that elusive millionaire who is deeply into financial servitude, of course...

I don't think anyone wants to step up and say that these people are not out there calling themselves proDommes. Where we are probably going to disagree is percentage. I say, based on talking with lots of people who are both online and rl, looking at profiles, and just my general sense of what I observe, there are far, far more women just out for $250, or whatever amount of money, than there are women who want to make it a professional, rewarding service/business.

Don't feel you need to point out some of the very professional proDommes or direct me to Max's. I don't see anyone stating that there is no such thing as a professional professional Domme. For every one example of such you can give, I can give you 20 profiles that represent someone with PMS out for some spare cash.



My response was to Realist, but I guess you can answer for him (I would appreciate his answer, but ok...)

This all started because he stated that ProDomination (not scammers pretending to be pro femdoms) were exploitive at $250.
That is a blanket statement -- and that's what I don't agree with.

Akasha




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 10:30:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
You have a serious lack of understanding of what the pro domination scene is, and instead focus on scam artists and bad eggs that will rip off any industry if they can; they are a small percentage of the OVERALL pro femdom market. They are probably simultaneously ripping off others on the net in OTHER ways.


Akasha, no one is ever going to argue that you do not understand professionalism, ethics, business plans, customer satisfaction and market prices. What you don't seem to understand is scammers. Say I have my trusty crop (thanx Farm and Fleet!) and my rust... er... trusty handcuffs (thanx Spencers!) Maybe I even have a black leather skirt (and it's crotchless, so you just know it's kinky!) I have no long term goals. I have no concern about repeat customers. But after an hour, I have $250! That's all I'm concerned about. I have no intention of making a living with it, it's gravy on top of some other source of income. Unless I find that elusive millionaire who is deeply into financial servitude, of course...

I don't think anyone wants to step up and say that these people are not out there calling themselves proDommes. Where we are probably going to disagree is percentage. I say, based on talking with lots of people who are both online and rl, looking at profiles, and just my general sense of what I observe, there are far, far more women just out for $250, or whatever amount of money, than there are women who want to make it a professional, rewarding service/business.

Don't feel you need to point out some of the very professional proDommes or direct me to Max's. I don't see anyone stating that there is no such thing as a professional professional Domme. For every one example of such you can give, I can give you 20 profiles that represent someone with PMS out for some spare cash.



My response was to Realist, but I guess you can answer for him (I would appreciate his answer, but ok...)

This all started because he stated that ProDomination (not scammers pretending to be pro femdoms) were exploitive at $250.
That is a blanket statement -- and that's what I don't agree with.


Sorry about that. When someone posts on a public board, I have always assumed this invites public commentary. My individual questions go in e-mails.

Mistress Suzy TrailerTrash calls herself a ProDomme. And she's a legend in her own mind. If people would just call themselves scammers, it would save a lot of confusion. But they don't. That's up to the rest of us.






AAkasha -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 10:35:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
You have a serious lack of understanding of what the pro domination scene is, and instead focus on scam artists and bad eggs that will rip off any industry if they can; they are a small percentage of the OVERALL pro femdom market. They are probably simultaneously ripping off others on the net in OTHER ways.


Akasha, no one is ever going to argue that you do not understand professionalism, ethics, business plans, customer satisfaction and market prices. What you don't seem to understand is scammers. Say I have my trusty crop (thanx Farm and Fleet!) and my rust... er... trusty handcuffs (thanx Spencers!) Maybe I even have a black leather skirt (and it's crotchless, so you just know it's kinky!) I have no long term goals. I have no concern about repeat customers. But after an hour, I have $250! That's all I'm concerned about. I have no intention of making a living with it, it's gravy on top of some other source of income. Unless I find that elusive millionaire who is deeply into financial servitude, of course...

I don't think anyone wants to step up and say that these people are not out there calling themselves proDommes. Where we are probably going to disagree is percentage. I say, based on talking with lots of people who are both online and rl, looking at profiles, and just my general sense of what I observe, there are far, far more women just out for $250, or whatever amount of money, than there are women who want to make it a professional, rewarding service/business.

Don't feel you need to point out some of the very professional proDommes or direct me to Max's. I don't see anyone stating that there is no such thing as a professional professional Domme. For every one example of such you can give, I can give you 20 profiles that represent someone with PMS out for some spare cash.



My response was to Realist, but I guess you can answer for him (I would appreciate his answer, but ok...)

This all started because he stated that ProDomination (not scammers pretending to be pro femdoms) were exploitive at $250.
That is a blanket statement -- and that's what I don't agree with.


Sorry about that. When someone posts on a public board, I have always assumed this invites public commentary. My individual questions go in e-mails.

Mistress Suzy TrailerTrash calls herself a ProDomme. And she's a legend in her own mind. If people would just call themselves scammers, it would save a lot of confusion. But they don't. That's up to the rest of us.





So if a scam artist calls himself "Experienced Legal Consultant" and rips people off on the net at $250 and hour for quick bucks, then all legal consultants are exploitve?

Akasha




MsSilvie -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 10:44:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
quote:


Snipped for space.


So if a scam artist calls himself "Experienced Legal Consultant" and rips people off on the net at $250 and hour for quick bucks, then all legal consultants are exploitve?


Not a bit. However, I'm more than happy to call him an explotive rip-off. And I'll also be happy to debate anyone that says just because a person calls themselves an "Experienced Legal Consultant" that means they are running a legit biz and know what they are doing.

"All scammers with a whip call themselves proDommes" does not mean "All proDommes are scammers".


Edited for the bracket monster.




AAkasha -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 10:49:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSilvie

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
quote:


Snipped for space.


So if a scam artist calls himself "Experienced Legal Consultant" and rips people off on the net at $250 and hour for quick bucks, then all legal consultants are exploitve?


Not a bit. However, I'm more than happy to call him an explotive rip-off. And I'll also be happy to debate anyone that says just because a person calls themselves an "Experienced Legal Consultant" that means they are running a legit biz and know what they are doing.

"All scammers with a whip call themselves proDommes" does not mean "All proDommes are scammers".


Edited for the bracket monster.


Then you agree with me that Realist was off base when he insinuated that pro domination as a profession is exploitive? He didn't say that scammers with whips who call themselves ProDommes are exploitive.

He said:
The average Pro-Domme rate is $250 per hour. That seems fairly universal insofar as I've read. I've seen ads as high as $1500 for an evening, plus expenses.

Please show me any provided service worth that rate.

Such gross excess pricing is exploitative, simple as that. If this provided service were in fact derived of a valid fetish, these Pro-Dommes would have a much more important reason to provide these services than financial gain. If such a valid fetish on their part, were present, the financial aspect and rates would vary greatly. Ever see a $25 an hour Pro-Domme? Yeah, me either. I conclude they don't have a secondary reason to provide a valued service then, and since all they want is money, their prices clearly show that sole aim.

I tolerate all valid and ethical fetishes, and enjoy several myself. I do not tolerate unethical exploitation of vulnerable people seeking BDSM and D/s.

The spectrum of acceptable kink ends abruptly at criminal, dishonest, unethical, and exploitative practices.

I disagree that "Your kink is your kink is your kink" and legally and ethically speaking, anything goes.



Akasha




Davesgirl -> RE: Reality Check (6/1/2005 1:48:05 PM)

Ok...after reading through this topic, and thinking before typing, really considering some of realists questions and comments, I had to post my own thoughts on a 24/7 relationship as they relate to my Master and I. Yes, I do consider myself a 24/7 slave, but to One Master, and only One.

Some of the questions psoed by realist really made me think. Such as is it possible to truely have a 24/7 D/s M/s dynamic. My answer, again, solely as it pertains to the relationship Im involved in, is a definate yes. How do I clean hosue as a slave? How do I go to teh grocery store as a slave? How do I parent as a slave?

It took some thinking on my part to be abel to answer these questions.

How do I clean house as a slave, if my Master is nto around? My Master is particular about the way His house is kept. I would clean hosue normally anyway, regardless of whether or not He was there. But, I put extra effort into making sure things are the way He prefers them. He may not be there constantly, keeping me naked and bound. But, its the fact that I know that this is something He, my Master wants, therefore He will have it as He wishes.

How do I go to the grocery store as a slave? Because that is a chore, so to speak, that He has assigned to me. He sets the limits on what needs to be spent, and has control over what I buy. I know I have a certain amount of time in order to do this, as well. So...yes, even though He is not around, I am very aware of His control and mastery over me.

How do I parent as a slave? We have 6 children. I have 4 from a previous(and disatrous) relationship, He has 2 from a previous marriage. I am a willing stay at home mother of them all. As the Man of the house, it is His rules that are enforced, His rewards and punishments that are abided by. I know that the way our children act and behave reflects back upon Him, not just me. I dont want anyone to have any reason to look down on, or think poorly of my Master. Therefore, I strive to see that our children are well mannered, do well in their schooling, and are happy, as well. Does this mean I wear my collar around them, or roam the hosue naked? No, it does not. We are both very aware of the fact that our children are entirely to young to be exposed to such things. Once they are older, and have questions, they will get answered honestly. So, yes, I do parent as a slave.

my point in all this is merely to show my view of things, and perhaps bring to your mind the realization that it is, indeed possible. No, we arent in a strictly sexual M/s dynamic. Master works very hard outside the home, and does get tired. Its at those times, when I am able to take care of Him when he gets home, that are where the true service is for me. Its in bringing Him his drink, rubbing His back and/or shoulders, and being readily available for whatever it is He needs of me, be it sexual or otherwise.

Is it very sexually arousing for me? Absolutely. There is nothing in the world that can compare to the exhileration of being totally exposed(not meaning clothing or lack there of), vulnerable, and completely owned than by being at my Masters feet. I dont do this because I am forced to, or because I am some uneducated twit who thinks her pussy is her only means of getting anywhere in the world. Far from it. I do this because of the deep love and trust I have for my Master. Our roles within our world are clearly defined...He commands, I obey. Even outside of the home, I defer to Him at all times. At gatherings or outings, I tend to Him first.

Am I some robot automaton? Oh hell no. Master prefers me to have oppinions and thoughts. How else could he have a conversation with me then, if I could not hold up my end of it as well? And I do have interests outside teh bedroom and His collar. I lvoe to read, go horseback riding, and am an avid sportsfan and participant. And Master loves this.

Sorry...turned this into mroe than what I orginally intended. I only wished to explain how a 24/7 dynamic does, in fact, work for Master and I. It doesnt mean it will work for everyone. But then again, there is no single thing in the world that will work for, or make happy, every single person. It takes many different types to spin thsi wonderful world around. So what if my definition of 24/7 differs from soemone else? Thats fine...Gives us things to talk about.

Just my two cents worth...[:)]




realist -> RE: Reality Check (6/2/2005 8:31:10 AM)

I'm happy to reply to your thoughts Akasha.

quote:

Not all male submissives are a vulnerable lot. Speak for yourself there. Many are capable of doing research and making intelligent decisions about how they spend their money, and they are satisfied with what they get for it.


Male subs have a statistically hard time finding dominant partners or play partners. Also, they defy gender role norms, and certainly this does make them vulnerable to social censure. Often, male subs have a strong outward, visible social life, and this is offset by an inner, non-visible, sexuality that is anything but those things. These men do not want to be known for their sexuality, they want to operate socially using their strengths, not their sexuality. These factors most likely incorporate the majority of male subs I imagine. These factors do indeed make them in general a vulnerable lot.

Being more specific, male subs who cannot obtain domination through any known social route, that is, those who want or need the highest discretion are tremendously vulnerable.....especially to exploitation. Because their choices are to live without it or pay way too much for it, they are easily taken advantage of. Hence, we see an average price of $250 per hour for professional domination.

Are these men satisfied with spending $250 per hour for professional domination? I'm not going to answer that since I'm not one of them. I will say though that if they are satisfied with such pricing, I find that utterly desperate on their part. I pity them.

And how exactly do you know they are satisfied with such pricing and obtained benefit? You do realise you spoke for all male subs who hire ProDommes don't you? From where did you get that sort of of sweeping fact?

That is your opinion, and it is not supported by fact. You merely made an assertion.

quote:

What per cent of professional dominants have no overhead? Give me an estimate in your opinion.


I've never taken a survey. Has anyone ever taken a survey on this question?

Since that question has no answer more valid than an opinion, let me adjust the question a bit.

What is the overhead cost of a professional dominatrix?

I have a nice collection of tools my wife and I enjoy playing with. The total cost is a few hundred dollars. Let's be generous and say a ProDomme would spend $1,000 minimum on neccesary toys and tools.

What is the overhead cost of playspace?

A ProDomme in South Carolina was operating out of her garage. Zero overhead there. Many ProDommes travel and play in hotel rooms, that overhead is roughly $100 to $200 depending on the hotel, but does the Domme pay for that or does the malesub? I wager that the malesub always does, with every ProDomme, in every case. Again, zero overhead costs for the ProDomme.

What about ProDommes who have dungeons? They spend as much as they want to, that it their investment and their decision. For a comparison, I cite fitness gyms, with many thousands of dollars of equipment, and their prices are a fraction of professional domination. You can get a membership to use gym facilities all you like for $250 (or less) a month. Compare that to $250 an hour, which ProDommes charge.

To get a professional fitness trainer, who is certified, with liability insurance, and college education, and had to spend thousands to obtain that education, that is roughly 50$ an hour.

Alternately, you can get a nurse, with a very expensive education, to perform medical treatments for you for less than $25 an hour.

I realise that dungeon play has an overhead cost. But it's not a whopping $250 an hour! Is most professional domination performed in an expensive setting, or is it performed in casual settings which have little or no overhead? What about those email Dommes? They have zero overhead and only a few minutes of their time and they charge $50 to $75 per email. That is a rip off as plain as day.

Regardless of overhead costs, the ProDomme rate remains universally $250 an hour.

quote:

You have a serious lack of understanding of what the pro domination scene is


How do you know what my level of understanding is?

How do you know I haven't read hundreds of ads and even contacted ProDommes? How do you know I haven't asked non-professional Dommes what they thought of $250 an hour for ass beatin'? (before you tell me ProDomming is not just about ass beatin', I make this statement because if a male sub wants an ass beating from a ProDomme, that's the rate for that, and it's a ripoff.)

I have been a sub for all my adult life, why do think I don't know the facts?

I have read a great deal in all those years.

quote:

You have a serious lack of understanding of what the pro domination scene is, and instead focus on scam artists and bad eggs that will rip off any industry if they can; they are a small percentage of the OVERALL pro femdom market. They are probably simultaneously ripping off others on the net in OTHER ways.


Now you are claiming to possess overall knowledge of the entire professional domination market. How do you know it's just a "small percentage of the OVERALL pro femdom market"? How do you know most ProDommes have overhead dungeon and/or staff costs high enough to justify the $250 an hour average?

No one knows these percentages. Not you and not I either.

I agree with your point that there's scammers in every industry. However, where online do we find any....any....complaint that scammers are in our midst in the BDSM community?

Zero.

Hence, I make my point via this thread and with this discussion.

quote:

Also, do you think that someone who makes $250/hr pro domming works 8 hrs a day? How many hrs a week do you think?


No. I think they have "vanilla" jobs and this is just an extra money source. The number of hours they work per week as not knowable unless a survey is done. It would vary by region, urban versus rural would be a potent variance inducing variable, just to cite one quick example.

Because these ProDommes do have dayjobs, even professions, and have income already, their financial need in regards to their male sub clientelle is even less justified at the average $250 an hour rate.

quote:

And, how much repeat business do the scam artists make, the ones that really are faking it?


Excellent question this is.

By faking it, I take it you mean those ProDommes just in it for the profit and not in it because they enjoy domination. These would be women who would not play with a given man, no matter what the chemistry or compatibility unless payment is made.

These ProDommes, it is easy to see, do stay in business, and actively seeking male subs are not a huge market, thus we can conclude that repeat business is a mainstay of this industry. What we can glean from that is that male subs do indeed pay these sums and continue to do so for extended periods of time.

This then directly exploits the obvious vulnerabilities male subs have. It exploits the statistical fact that there are fewer female dominants than male subs, the fact that many male subs need discretion, that many malesubs desire specific forms of play and don't know how to find appropriate play partners. All of this conspires to create the climate where $250 an hour has become the average price for what many other non-money-seeking dominant women do for free, because they enjoy it.

Free of charge versus $250 an hour.

That....is the difference between BDSM enjoyment and scamming.

There are those professional Dommes who have huge dungeons, like Irene Boss of Pittsburg. She offeres the highest end services imaginable to most male subs and she does have enormous overhead costs. She is extremely educated and renowned internationally for being a truly top notch player. She enjoys BDSM and charges $250 an hour, and that's absolutely as ethical as can be.

And there are a thousand other Dommes with none of that sort of equipment, no overhead, doing email domination only, or chatroom domination, or even less than that, who possess little or no education about BDSM and little or no experience as well, and they charge as much as Irene does.

That's scamming.

There are more scammers than legit ProDommes it would appear. I don't really care about the exact numbers, the point is that the entire range of money seeking dominants out there are awash in a sea of scammers claiming to be legit also.

Rarely....is $250 an hour justified. Very rarely. But have we seen any ProDommes who have a lesser rate?

I have never seen that.

Not once.

quote:

And, do you believe the rip off pro femdoms do it for a living? That is all the income they make?


Scam-Dommes have regular jobs. They just do it for the extra cash.

I am surprised that some ProDommes don't lower prices, in a competitive market, you'd think someone out there would try to hedge against higher end Dommes and get a larger piece of the male sub market.

Of course, there are those 1-900 phoneline Dommes, what, $5 a minute?

For talking.

Tell me that's not a scam.

quote:

You also never addressed the point I made regarding other "consultation" that costs $250/hr. I gave you an example and you ignored it.


I am not a heavy internet user. I make time to come here to this thread. I do not ignore people, I do my best to reply as time permits. This thread got much larger than I anticipated and I cannot adequately reply to everyone or every good point. Several posters have made excellent comments and I just can't reply to them all. My apologies for that.

I have thought about this consultation point of yours. I said earlier "show me any service worth $250 an hour". Perhaps that phrasing was not precise enough. I meant (but admit I didn't say specifically enough) a personal service, like fitness training, massage therapy, tattoos maybe, yoga or Tae Chi instruction. Some service comparable to professional domination.

Your example of high end consultation is vague, but I'll still address it. Does such consultation service comprise multiple employees? Field research? Licensing and insurance? Corporate status? Travel? Advanced degree college education? Office upkeep? Vehicles? Special tools?

For $250 an hour, you get quite an arsenal of competence and guaranteed accurate information from a professional consultant don't you. That is not comparable at all to professional domination which has little or none of those sorts of overhead costs or background considerations.

One thing I am sharply critical of in online subculture (not just BDSM online subculture, all of them in general) is collective pretending. How many people here will post that professional domination is akin, or equated to in some way, to high end consultations services? Spanking compared to oil reserve measurement 1,500 feet below the surface? That's their equation?

It's pretty easy to call that less than realistic. I call it pretending.

quote:

And you also did not address the point I made about why don't we all charge $25 an hour if we love what we do?


Why, indeed, don't you?

I suspect it's becuase you don't have to. You can get $250 an hour because male subs are in an easy to exploit position. There's no market consideration that forces you to adapt and lower rates competitively. Male subs will pay that rate and ProDommes, who seek money far more than the BDSM component, will not lower their prices, and do not lower their prices.

Is there one discount Domme on Earth?

It's just extra money for most of them from an easy to exploit source prone to repeat business.

The male sex drive is powerful, it renews often, it is lifelong. Hell of a way to make a buck eh?

quote:

The problem I see with your statements is that they show such a complete lack of understanding of a marketplace yet you claim to be an expert


I have never claimed to be any sort of expert whatsoever. You cannot post anything I have said that would justify your accusation here. That is an unsupported assertion, again.

You have no idea what level of education and awareness I have of the marketplace in regards to professional domination or the marketplace in general.

quote:

and I know it would simply take some short research on your part to find out how much you are wrong.


But you post zero evidence in support of this claim.

If the research is so brief, why do you not post it?

Please post professional domination priced less than $250 an hour. Post domination services provided by just one ProDomme who does so because she knows many men thirst for it and have trouble finding it. Show me one ProDomme out there who offers services only because she wants male subs to experience fulfillment. For less than $250 an hour, that is.

I only ask for one example.

We all know I can post hundreds of examples of money seeking half-assed ScamDommes.

quote:

You won't do that though. And, I think a lot of your claims are the same way -- based on your own ideas, with no real facts to back them up.


I have supplied numerous facts in this thread. I posted an article by Dorothy Hayden. I posted several Collarme.com ads that were directly money related and obvious scams. I have used many common sense arguments because people do often find collectively agreed upon facts in them. For example, in regards to the online 24/7 claim, I argued that mere concentration induces a singular mindset and other, purportedly 24/7 considerations are not and cannot be present during such times, hence the 24/7 claim cannot be taken literally. That is arguing with factual backing Akasha.

I have asked you for facts Akasha, and if you post facts contrary to any position I currently hold, I will learn, and retract any errors I've made. I always let fact guide me. I also, just like every human being, have my own ideas, and I have steadfastly shown here in this thread that I do emply fact. If I had ever seen a ProDomme ad for less than $250 an hour, I would not have made the claim that I never have seen such an ad. I even asked you to post an ad like that and prove me wrong. I not only use fact to support my own arguments, I also openly seek fact contrary to any argument I might have. I've been wrong countless times, each one was a learning experience. I rather enjoy that, actually.

Rather humble and honest of me is it not?

Your assertion that I am a self-proclaimed expert is wholly invalid then, Akasha.

And....these are just my opinions. I'm not telling everyone online they need to be more like me or that I am universally correct. I think online subculture has problems and weaknesses. How can addressing and discussing them be a bad thing?

Have a good day [:)]





Mercnbeth -> RE: Reality Check (6/2/2005 9:42:49 AM)

Some things CAN be absolute. Below is a schedule of rates from a VERY nice, reputable, Professional Dungeon in LA. I won't list the name or location, but if anyone wants to verify that this is real contact me direct and I'll be happy to provide it.

It is a fantastic location with huge play space, a wide variety of furniture, and different scene rooms from "school-house" to "frilly boudoir" for forced or voluntary cross-dressing. It's open for business during the week and on weekends a group uses the space for parties; which is how beth and I became familiar with it.

The woman here range from full time life-stylers to those that just see this as a way to make money. Based upon their success I'd say they are GOOD at what they do. I think this facility, and others like it, serve a function in society. They provide an outlet and are much safer than the internet. I'm sure you get what you pay for. To my knowledge there is not a similar heterosexual facility providing male Doms. I guess we males are just to common.

So yes, you can get good domination for less than $200/hour. BTW - These rates are for either a Domme or submissive.

2 Hours $ 320
1 Hour 45 minutes $ 280
1 1/2 Hours $ 240
1 Hour 15 minutes $ 200
1 Hour $ 160
45 minutes $ 130
1/2 Hour $ 100
3 Lady Special $ 380 per hour
2 Lady 1 Hour Special $ 240
2 Lady 1/2 Hour Special $ 160
Fantasy Wrestling $ 130 per 1/2 Hour
Competitive Wrestling $ 200 per 1/2 Hour




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875