Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: golliwogs - racially offensive?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
[Poll]

golliwogs - racially offensive?


I'm black/Afro-Caribbean; I find them offensive
  7% (3)
I'm black/Afro-Caribbean; I dont find them offensive
  4% (2)
I'm not black/Afro Caribbean; I find them offensive
  36% (15)
I'm not black/Afro-Caribbean; I dont find them offensive
  51% (21)


Total Votes : 41


(last vote on : 8/12/2007 7:50:26 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:14:34 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

FR: 

Nothing in and of itself can be uniformly defined as "offensive" to all people. 

Feeling offended by something or someone is a personal choice that, at the end of the day, only affects the offendEE.

quote:

marietoo
Symbols" are subjective, and "intent" is hardly something that can be proven, and things that "offend" others is a variable.  Therefore the statement highlighted in red cannot be taken as a fact.  
What will offend one person wouldn't offend another.  The differing viewpoints in this thread are a display of that.  Who cares what someone's intent is if they give you the middle finger, for instance?  You can choose to be offended and report them for sexual harassement, or you can shrug it off.


quote:

marietoo
Then you have a choice to make; either feel offended or not.  They are still going to be in someone's car window.


quote:

marietoo
Then don't display one.  I didnt even know what they were until this thread.  I personally wouldnt have the desire to display one, but I certainly respect someone else's right to see it as whatever symbol they see it as.


I got tired of quoting you....You make a horribly lackluster  analogy to something as inocuos as a bullwhip and try to compare that to the golliwogs..........You have gone on and on.

quote:

I am parking my car outside of your house and in the window will be a sign that reads, "marietoo is a ignorant useless subhuman piece of crap.".....Would you be offended?


That would only speak of you, not about me.  Feel free to call me what you like.  At the end of the day...or the middle of it for that matter, you are not significant to me and I would likely not file a lawsuit for harassement, because you have the right to think of me however you would like.  And you probably have the right to call me names, though posting someones personal name, rather than a symbol of a fat person,  would probably borderline on criminal. 

quote:

Yes it is possible the person who put the golliwog on display is dumb, maybe thinks that they are adorable or maybe the person feels that blacks are a subhuman race....either way it is extremely easy why some people if not the majority might be offended by that person's actions.


I spoke to a much broader point of view in my original post and it was in regards to questions on the poll about feeling offended by something. 

quote:

I find it incredibly assinine when someone makes the argument....Well, I'm Irish, and you can say that all Irish are drunks and it won't phase me a bit! Or that all Italians are in the mafia.....Is that a comparison to what people of African decent have had to endure?...It is incredibly short sighted if not blantantly showing a glaring ignorance as well as a tremendous lack of compassion.


Thats not the argument I made at all.  Its the argument you need to see in order to support your position.  Again, I was speaking about feeling personally offended about things and how we can choose to react.

quote:

I don't understand your argument.



Im not asking you to.


_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:19:22 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
why did you take the word "Fat" out of your post on edit domiboy?? 


For those who may have missed it,

The original statement was

"marietoo is a fat ignorant useless subhuman piece of crap.".....Would you be offended?"
 
Did you have second thoughts about saying something that would make you appear bigoted against fat people, while you were arguing against racism?





< Message edited by marieToo -- 6/1/2007 9:24:45 AM >


_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:31:20 AM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
No. I took it out because it was specific to you....I thought you might possibly be overweight and it could be thought of as a personal attack and therefore against TOS.  The golliwog is a caricature showing a particular group of people as being less than human.

And I take it by calling me "domiboy" that you might be a little offended....Funny how it all works isn't it?

_____________________________



(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:33:35 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

No. I took it out because it was specific to you....I thought you might possibly be overweight and it could be thought of as a personal attack and therefore against TOS.  The golliwog is a caricature showing a particular group of people as being less than human.

And I take it by calling me "domiboy" that you might be a little offended....Funny how it all works isn't it?


actually that was an honest misake, though I doubt you will believe that.

_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:35:22 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

No. I took it out because it was specific to you....I thought you might possibly be overweight and it could be thought of as a personal attack and therefore against TOS.  The golliwog is a caricature showing a particular group of people as being less than human.


why would fat be classified as a personal attack but not "sub human piece of crap"? 


_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:36:58 AM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
I don't.  Too easy for you to say it was an "honest mistake"..... It refutes everything that you have been arguing for hours......Sucks doesn't it?

_____________________________



(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:39:12 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

I don't.  Too easy for you to say it was an "honest mistake"..... It refutes everything that you have been arguing for hours......Sucks doesn't it?


Take it as you will.  Your choice.  Aint nothing sucky about that.

_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:40:02 AM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
My work here is done. I tire of you.

_____________________________



(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:43:03 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

My work here is done. I tire of you.


Direct Translation:  I couldnt offend you. Im off to insult someone else.

_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 9:52:41 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBBTBW


I wonder how someone can out grow blatent smacks of racism.  As I said earlier whatever verbal reason he gave about displaying such an offensive symbol, the mere fact that he did it shows us his mindset.  Honestly do you really deep down think this man  put it on his car simply because he collects them.  Do you honestly believe he didn't give a thought to the social and societal implications of his display?



Yes I can believe that he did this without giving it a thought - most likely because he is one of those people who like me I hope, dont think of any connection any longer and see it just as a toy, or because he's one of the large proportion of the population incapable of reasoning the possible consequences to others of his actions.

Also maybe relevant is that the town where this occurred (Leek) is very small, quite rural and there might not be many or even any AC people living there. Thats not an excuse, but may have gone some way to the guy not thinking it could be a problem too, should he have poor attitudes.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to BBBTBW)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 10:21:06 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Thing is, marie, you are defending freedom of speech and expression at all cost; it's your belief.

Personally I prefer to put reason before belief.



_____________________________



(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 12:34:31 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Thing is, marie, you are defending freedom of speech and expression at all cost; it's your belief.

Personally I prefer to put reason before belief.




Im not defending anything at any cost.  I am only debating all the points and "what if" questions that have been directly addressed to me in others' efforts to refute my original statement, not the least of which was Domiguy's poor comparison of putting someone's personal name and photo with a label of fat subhuman piece of crap under it and parking outside the window of said person's residence.  That wasn't even analogous to the OP.   So cut me a break, I haven't exactly had the best material to work with.
 
My original statement:
FR: 

Nothing in and of itself can be uniformly defined as "offensive" to all people. 

 
Feeling offended by something or someone is a personal choice that, at the end of the day, only affects the offendEE. 


The OP was in Poll Format.
One of the choice options was:  non black and not racially offended.  That would be me.  I am not offended by racial symbols or polish jokes, innuendoes of mafioso etc. It simply does not offend me.  I am offended by people being treated unfairly, abused, or treated unjustly or unlawfully;  not by some stranger's beliefs about a particular color or race and certainly not by what some dude has hanging in his windshied. . And when I AM offended by something, I am aware that I choose that reaction and that the reaction is based on my associations, beliefs and experiences.  Believe it or not, there are several things that one could call me that would offend me, whereas being called a guinea really doesn't bother me. And yet, another poster implied that I was not being 'honest' when I said that. Another implied that I cant understand because I do not come from a heritage of slavery. If that
is the case, then I suppose all non-blacks should not be posting here..  

My feeling on this issue  does not mean I support racism, it does not mean I am not aware, saddened or sickened by what blacks in slavery went through or what jews went through or that a homosexual man gets beat to death for being gay, or some obese person gets called a fat pig by a passerby and gets french fries thrown at them, it doesn't mean I am indifferent about "humanity" and "courtesy" in general, as you implied.  It simply means that I am not offended by this particular story or by SOME other racial issues that may offend others.

I never said certain things don't offend me.  I never said racism is cool.  I never said we should all go around railing on races we dont like because we have the freedom of speech.  What I did was debate my position,  more than once, quiet calmly and respectfully, with people who addressed me,  despite the rudeness that I have been treated with.

There was another girl who posted last night: "tatangle" .   My feelings on this whole issue are very much aligned with her post which was spoken far better than I have done.  It is my belief that once upon a time there wasn't enough sensitivity to racial issues, and now there is an "over-sensitivity" about it.  I realize its not the most popular view, but it is a view that some do share.  I see  tatangel also endured a lot of sarcasm and disrespect simply because her writings did not align with the beliefs of the majority posting here. 

This is a topic that I have strong feelings about, as do others; I understand that. And it's why I spoke to it for as long as I did.  It's rare that I even take an issue this far in such a forum anymore.  The other night I was accused of racism when I made a joke about chinese food. THAT offended me, and I chose to react as such. 

There is no reason why both points of view couldn't have been discussed without the insults, animated text, and underhanded implications that took place on this thread. 
Convolute and twist my meaning and points all you like.  I've said all Im going to say with this particular group on this particular topic; not because Im not capable of debating it into the ground but because it would be a futile attempt to discuss something  when people are debating with their emotions and hot-headedness instead of their reasoning abilities. 

< Message edited by marieToo -- 6/1/2007 12:38:05 PM >


_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/1/2007 12:59:19 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Phew... looks like I'm the scapegoat for your frustrations, doesn't it. Well that's fine, I don't mind.

I shall remind you, however, that I didn't insult you in anyway and merely reminded you that perhaps you didn't hold all the clues about golliwogs. If that's an insult, your touchiness won't play in your favour should you wish to engage in any other informed debate.

You are right, this is getting utterly tedious. Good luck.

_____________________________



(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/3/2007 4:53:26 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

The first thing would have to be someone feeling offended or righteous enough to file a civil complaint about something that they felt was "flaunting" a "symbol of black slavery".   Then the courts would have to decide if the defendant's  "flaunting" was against the law, what the defendant's intention was, and whether or not he/she did any damage to another human being.  Then of course a court would pass down a judgement.  Isn't that what is going on in the golliwog case?    



Yeah, it is. In my mind, your position isn't clear.

Are you saying:

a) A person has a right to express his/her feelings.
b) There should be no consequence because that would impede the civil liberty of the person expressing his/her feelings.

or

a) A person should be true to his/herself and express his/her feelings accordingly.
b) That person will quite rightly have to face the rule of law regarding his/her actions.

or something else.

Your comment around some taking offence and others not taking offence - that's a given. I can't see the importance of this given to a discussion around the rule of law and this particular case.

Also, I'm not implying you can't fully understand because you're not from a certain background, I'm actually stating this outright. It is misguided to then state all non-blacks should not post on this thread (as a consequence of my statement). There are several issues here a) the rule of law b) protection of minority groups c) equality. A person doesn't have to be black, or understand racism that has afflicted the black community for centuries, to have an opinion on this subject.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/3/2007 6:02:14 AM   
BBBTBW


Posts: 836
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBBTBW


I wonder how someone can out grow blatent smacks of racism.  As I said earlier whatever verbal reason he gave about displaying such an offensive symbol, the mere fact that he did it shows us his mindset.  Honestly do you really deep down think this man  put it on his car simply because he collects them.  Do you honestly believe he didn't give a thought to the social and societal implications of his display?



Yes I can believe that he did this without giving it a thought - most likely because he is one of those people who like me I hope, dont think of any connection any longer and see it just as a toy, or because he's one of the large proportion of the population incapable of reasoning the possible consequences to others of his actions.

Also maybe relevant is that the town where this occurred (Leek) is very small, quite rural and there might not be many or even any AC people living there. Thats not an excuse, but may have gone some way to the guy not thinking it could be a problem too, should he have poor attitudes.

E


When we forget about history, we are doomed to repeat it.  I appreciate the fact that perhaps you don't see skin color but see people as people.  I am that way as well.  However, when I choose to do something that has social implications, I do think twice about it and what those implications may bring about. 

Most black people that live in "civilized societies" are reminded every day in one way or another that they are black.  It's not like we can forget nor do we want to but when it is pushed in your face every day, you are going to react negatively to certain symbols of your racial ancestry and the hatred and mistreatment that ensued.  You are going to recall all the racist attitudes that you have ever been the recipient of, you are going to recall the continuing mistreatment of yourself and others of your race simply because of your skin color. 

Are there any organized non-minority hating groups?  Here we have a few minority hating groups, Skin Heads, KKK just to name a couple.  They are proud of their philosophies.  Tell me who perpetrates more hate crimes than anyone else?  It's not minorities.  This is why we get up in arms.  It's not oversensitivity as someone said, It's self protection and letting people know that their seemingly innocent actions are not going un-noticed.  As I said before, if we let the small things slide by, then we won't have the strength to fight the big things. 

Obviously someone needed a wake up call and he got it.  I hope that it has served as a wakeup call for others as well.  I think it has for you, otherwise I don't think you would have started this thread.

The golliwogs are an offensive symbol because of their history.  The things that might have been socially acceptable to a certain group of people in the 70's will not be tolerated in public settings in this day and age. 

For the record, golliwogs and other symbols of this type were NEVER acceptable to Black People.  We just had to tolerate the ignorace that was behind because we weren't strong enough to fight against it like we are now.

_____________________________

"You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means" -- Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 6/3/2007 10:42:26 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
'

< Message edited by marieToo -- 6/3/2007 10:48:14 PM >


_____________________________

marie.


I give good agita.









(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 8/12/2007 2:57:51 AM   
NefertariReborn


Posts: 381
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBBTBW

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBBTBW


I wonder how someone can out grow blatent smacks of racism.  As I said earlier whatever verbal reason he gave about displaying such an offensive symbol, the mere fact that he did it shows us his mindset.  Honestly do you really deep down think this man  put it on his car simply because he collects them.  Do you honestly believe he didn't give a thought to the social and societal implications of his display?



Yes I can believe that he did this without giving it a thought - most likely because he is one of those people who like me I hope, dont think of any connection any longer and see it just as a toy, or because he's one of the large proportion of the population incapable of reasoning the possible consequences to others of his actions.

Also maybe relevant is that the town where this occurred (Leek) is very small, quite rural and there might not be many or even any AC people living there. Thats not an excuse, but may have gone some way to the guy not thinking it could be a problem too, should he have poor attitudes.

E


When we forget about history, we are doomed to repeat it.  I appreciate the fact that perhaps you don't see skin color but see people as people.  I am that way as well.  However, when I choose to do something that has social implications, I do think twice about it and what those implications may bring about. 

Most black people that live in "civilized societies" are reminded every day in one way or another that they are black.  It's not like we can forget nor do we want to but when it is pushed in your face every day, you are going to react negatively to certain symbols of your racial ancestry and the hatred and mistreatment that ensued.  You are going to recall all the racist attitudes that you have ever been the recipient of, you are going to recall the continuing mistreatment of yourself and others of your race simply because of your skin color. 

Are there any organized non-minority hating groups?  Here we have a few minority hating groups, Skin Heads, KKK just to name a couple.  They are proud of their philosophies.  Tell me who perpetrates more hate crimes than anyone else?  It's not minorities.  This is why we get up in arms.  It's not oversensitivity as someone said, It's self protection and letting people know that their seemingly innocent actions are not going un-noticed.  As I said before, if we let the small things slide by, then we won't have the strength to fight the big things. 

Obviously someone needed a wake up call and he got it.  I hope that it has served as a wakeup call for others as well.  I think it has for you, otherwise I don't think you would have started this thread.

The golliwogs are an offensive symbol because of their history.  The things that might have been socially acceptable to a certain group of people in the 70's will not be tolerated in public settings in this day and age. 

For the record, golliwogs and other symbols of this type were NEVER acceptable to Black People.  We just had to tolerate the ignorace that was behind because we weren't strong enough to fight against it like we are now.


Amen, and again I say amen!

(in reply to BBBTBW)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 8/12/2007 3:29:51 AM   
givemyall


Posts: 620
Joined: 12/3/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Yes I can believe that he did this without giving it a thought - most likely because he is one of those people who like me I hope, dont think of any connection any longer and see it just as a toy, or because he's one of the large proportion of the population incapable of reasoning the possible consequences to others of his actions.

Also maybe relevant is that the town where this occurred (Leek) is very small, quite rural and there might not be many or even any AC people living there. Thats not an excuse, but may have gone some way to the guy not thinking it could be a problem too, should he have poor attitudes.

E


I agree with you LadyEllen....maybe he just didn't see them as offensive.

I collect pot pigs, piggybanks etc, I have done for years, the first thing I bought when I was a kid was a piggybank which is still in my possession...... I don't see these as offensive, but a few years ago the Police called at the house of someone who had a collection of pigs on their front windowsill, they had to be removed from the windowsill due to the fact that a muslim person had seen them and complained, apparently they were offensive to him.  I guess its whether you look at a pot ornament and imagine it as a real live pig, or look at a ugly cabbagepatch doll and see it as a baby, or a golliwog and see it as a black person.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 8/12/2007 7:37:51 AM   
TankII7871


Posts: 174
Joined: 4/22/2005
Status: offline
I grew up in a small place in Kentucky.  When I young I used to hang out with a old black man named Slaughter Ray.  Now everyone called him Mr Ray and everyone tipped their hat to him.  He was the only Black person in the county.  I would see people that wouldn't even watch the Cosby show because they wouldn't watch black people on TV treat Mr Ray with respect.  Being a kid and not knowing that I shouldn't ask questions about race I one day asked him why people treated him the way they did.  He looked at me and said "boy Ive been here all my life. I have earned the respect I get.  When I was younger they came with their bed sheets and tried to burn me out.  They were doing it because i was black.  I shot at them because they were trying to burn me out didn't matter to me if they were white under those sheets or purple.  You see boy you can out last a man with a closed mind and thats what a racist is a closed minded fool.  as long as you have a open mind there is no such thing as racism.  Besides boy I think its funny how they burn the symbol of their own faith trying to scare others.  I have thought about the lessons that old black man took the time to teach a little red headed white boy allot over the years.  you can find racism in anything and in everything.  But a open minded person will find what they believe is the best not the worse.  Mr Ray was right closed minded people are funny


Eric

Just picturing Mr Ray looking down and laughting his ass off

(in reply to givemyall)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? - 8/12/2007 7:55:00 AM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
Since this thread ended,  I have changed my position.....It's so refreshing to see a thread exhumed like a strangled hookers corpse...It's lovely.

I now collect golliwogs....There are fun.  However, they are rather hard to find...If some fucking liberal or "do gooder" is offended by them I show them my new collection of "Trashy Talker Dolls"....

http://www.redhotcurry.com/views/trash_talker.htm


_____________________________



(in reply to TankII7871)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: golliwogs - racially offensive? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078