LordODiscipline
Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004 Status: offline
|
Fargle: He is right to the extent that he carries it. There have been some significant studys about the efficacy of "torture", how to effectively implement it, and what is effective. The US Military has very strict rules about what is and what is not allowed - with a consideration toward the Geneva Convention, the UCMJ and the studies aforementioned. By most standards what THEY USE is not "torture" but is characterized as "enhanced interogation" The legal and ethical limits of these actions must meet specific guidleines and specific timings based on the character of the person interrogated, the actionable event, and the manner of capture. They are not doing the things alluded to - waterboarding, nails, etc. However, the US government in the guise of the intelligence services is using othe countries and other resources to interrogate these prisoners (including the use of "waterboarding") because of the limitations the military has ingrained within the system of jurisprudence and behavior which it uses and is regulated by. The givernment came to use these techniques because *with every generation faced with a crisis of catastrophic proportions within an ethically based society there comes the question of "why not?"*. "Why should we not use techniques which are considered effective by people through millenia?" They are forgetting basis for the rejection within the country proper and the incredible studies conducted (not only by this country - but, most extensively by the former Soviet Republic and by which we have based some of our determinations and restrictions) But, enough of that... The rhetoiric of your posting (re: "Nazis") is silly and smacks of inflamtion of emotional verve against alleged established policies of this government... it is not a rational argument- only an argument... and, in that it loses sway with people who simply want the facts so that they might make up their own mind wihtout a lot of bull sh*t tossed about as though it were contributing to a discussion - when in reality, it is actually contributing to divisivness... and, that is a Jeffersonian technique. ~J
_____________________________
"Anyone who thinks they're important is usually just a pompous moron who can't deal with his or her own pathetic insignificance and the fact that what they do is meaningless and inconsequential." William Thomas
|