Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: farglebargle Torture is, like Rape, INHERENTLY EVIL, and therefore there is NEVER any justification for it. Perhaps. It is inherently undesireable, if committed on a non-consenting party, I would agree, and such would also be the case for most western schools of ethics. I will refrain from commenting on the concept of "evil", save to say that I have not found the concept useful in any context. Perhaps you might substitute "abominable" or somesuch? That said, given the choice between such an atrocity against a stranger, and losing the people I love, I'd have to go with being the bad guy. Then again, I consider survival from the naturalist side: you do what you have to do. This does not, however, imply that I mean it is currently being used for acceptable reasons. quote:
If you'll rape someone for a GOOD reason, you'll rape them for ANY reason. This does not follow. If you are willing to do X to survive, it does not follow that you'll do X to get yourself killed when you want to live, for instance. Suffice to say that if you'll hurt someone given what you consider an adequate reason (I will not bring justification into it; I would not feel justified in doing such a thing, even if I, in my opinion, had due cause to do it) then you will do it for any adequate reason, because you have the capacity to do it when you have the need to. That does not imply that you would do it for what you consider inadequate reasons, or that you would do it "just for kicks", or even like doing it.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|