BeingChewsie
Posts: 1633
Joined: 10/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MstrDouglas The biggest issue I cna see with it is the fact her sentence stipulated that she NOT be put under house arrest and released with an electronic teather. Also her time had already been reduced by the judge, to like 23 days instead of 45, and the sherriff has put it back to the original ammount under the teather. What it boils down to is the sherriff is over riding the courts order, and setting his own. That is why they ordered her back into court today and are looking at the sherriff being held in contempt of court. Too many people are screaming about this, especially when it is being reported that the "medical condition" is a rash, and that she complained about the food. If you cant do the time, dont do the crime.....unless you are a celebrity and have mega bucks. The electronic tether issue aside... Did she serve 10% of her 23 days sentence in jail? If she did, she served the average out here. Why should she serve the whole thing when other not famous, not wealthy people don't have too? People want to punish her in part because she is rich. Being ultra rich is not a crime, neither is buying a great legal defense, neither is being a clueless, spoiled, slut. Jesus if it was half of Orange County would be in the slammer. She shouldn't be breaking the law but neither should the countless other no name CA residents I see getting gooned up in bars and restaurants all the time and stumbling out to the valet to get in their cars and drive home. People get busted for DUI's all the time out here, multiple offenses and NEVER do a lick of time. I work in addiction- detox and rehab, they come through detox for a spin dry all the time.
_____________________________
"In fact, it is my contention that most women are accepting of way less than optimal circumstance constantly, and are lucky to be 'snagged' by the right man, if ever. But it is more by happy accident than by their design. " ~Ron and Hup
|