Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross LOL and the notion that people are annoyed because LuckyAlbatross isn't saying what she means is really amusing. Not really; she wasn't talking about being blunt, I think. Look at the discussions that have been regarding the meanings of words, for instance. Your position in those is different from many who are neurologically typical (NT). Forums leave little room for the cues that are necessary for the usual NT mode of communication. Online, the aspie mode of communication is actually better for both parties. That's part of the reason why people who can get along perfectly fine offline can find themselves constantly at each others virtual throats when online. quote:
I MEANT to say, and think I pretty much did, that we've all got crap in our lives to deal with. The OP put "etc" in her post- how is that supposed to be clear and to know she meant only biologically permanent problems in life were going to be considered as legitimate crap in this thread? ~nod~ She should have specified that this thread was an offshoot from the aspie thread. For many, like me, the context was apparent; for many, like you, it will not be. quote:
If you want to go that route- what about being female and all the hurdles that causes? I would be very interested in a thread about that. It would make for interesting reading, help me be better at accomodating both genders, and allow me to do more realistic portrayal of female characters in creative writing and roleplaying games. Please do start one; being male, I don't think I can contribute any accurate problem descriptions, but I'd love to read them, and offer any insights I can on what the issues look like from the other side of the coin. quote:
Trying to suggest that one persons pain is more than another is arrogant, selfish, and myopic. ~nod~ Those women in Somalia should really shut up. Paris Hilton has it far worse. Seriously, the issue is really that people's tolerance to adversity depends on what they are used to. When the level of crap in life increases, it either kills you, or it recalibrates your scale. Most people tend to assume their scale is universally applicable, whether they are aspies or NTs or something else. It rarely is. Some things are objectively worse, but that doesn't change the validity of subjective experience. This in reply to both of you, really. quote:
Now, I know those are all classic traits of people with aspergers, and depression and many other things. Heck, most humans are like that with some things no matter what's going on. Glad you tossed in the last bit. People aren't all that different on either side of the coin. Najakcharmer posted a funny segment in the aspie thread about how NTs would be viewed in a society where aspies were the norm; it reads pretty much the same as NT descriptions of aspies. Similarly, I have played with the diagnostic criteria in the past, and found that one can make almost identically worded ones that would allow an aspie to "diagnose" an NT as afflicted by "neurologically typical syndrome". quote:
But it's still wrong to try and do. Depends on your outlook. In the NT outlook, "worse" needs to be asserted by an external observer to be valid. In the aspie outlook, "worse" can be asserted by comparing objective impact on life and be valid. Neither approach is more or less valid than the other, though one is more common.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|