RE: Drug Legalization (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


farglebargle -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/6/2007 10:01:32 PM)

Try it with Maker's Mark Bourbon...





Aileen68 -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/6/2007 10:05:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Try it with Maker's Mark Bourbon...




Oooh...the last thing I need is to start drinking hard liquor.
I'll buy some tomorrow.  [:)]




TheHeretic -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/6/2007 10:43:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lighthearted

just because help is available doesn't mean it's GOING TO WORK.  it also doesn't mean that the addict WILL AGREE TO PARTICIPATE.  if it was simply a matter of available resources then THE RATE OF RELAPSE WOULD BE 0%. 




         We cannot eradicate drugs, nor the need of people to alter their consciousness.  Addiction would be better dealt with without the criminal aspect.  Safe, reliable doses would go a long way to preventing overdoses.  Drugs not loaded with street impurities, or made with toxic substitutions would save a lot more lives.

          Harm reduction is the better option, until they decide to quit and mean it.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 5:41:00 AM)

Greetings lighthearted,

Yeah I know alot of people make up their mind on something, and then close it. Rather than just give a blanket opinion, state some reasons (not emotions) that keeping it criminalized will make things better.

My Uncle died of a speed overdose, I have lost four very close friends to speed, heroin and cocaine, there are many people within the mindset that illicit drugs should be legal, that have had a family member die. I guess going to a sleazy hotel, breaking the door in, picking making my friend pack, taking her and locking her away until she could get treatment, you know during those withdrawl symptoms, and beating the shit out of her pimp, does not count for dealing personally with an addict. Sorry for your lose, but it is your choice to not even consider another view on it with reason and logic. You do not corner the market on emotion about this issue.

You call it berate, and I call it response in a discussion. If you do not wish to discuss, then stop posting remarks on the issue.

Not sure what you mean about the unborn child and bong hits. Sounds like another "what about the kids?" sound bite, rather than offer rational points against the issues.

Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: lighthearted

hello Orion,

the problem with any discussion with regard to politics, religion, drugs, etc is that the parties involved all have their respective opinions, and, whether they care to admit it or not, pretty much have no interest in really having their opinions swayed.  I, at least, was forthright enough to state that from the start.

just because my feelings are emotional doesn't mean they are irrational.  find me more than one random person who has had a family member die from a drug overdose that is in favor of legalizing drugs and I will be happy to listen to what they have to say. 

I'm confused by your need to berate me.  I don't feel the need to be paranoid of every piece of information that tells me something I don't want to hear and cry, it must be a government conspiracy!  the real question here, is, why take a chance on the health of an unborn baby?  because you haven't been convinced?  put the bong down!  it's easy, right, because pot is not addicting! 




IrishMist -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 6:00:03 AM)

quote:

Medicines/Drugs ARE legal....just not for everyone.  Mom & Dad are already taking mood altering substances and providing their kids with access to them as well...out of their prescription/OTC bottles/packages and from some things they find on the grocery store shelf.   kids that routinely help themselves to a few out of each of their parent's bottles and share with their friends call it "pharm-ing" and folks have been jacking their wee ones up on sugar, caffiene, Ritalin, etc. for quite a while now.

Hi Beth
I will not argue with what you have said here; these are substances that I have argued against for years ( the use of that is in the control of youngins, etc )

quote:

  Bit puzzled why people think marijuana qualifies as a problem

I want to touch on this from Sinergy. Despite the kind of work that I do, this is something that I do agree with. I have no issues with the legalization of marijuana because it DOES have some powerful medicinal qualities that could help alot of people if they were given the chance to avail themselves of it's use ( I am not refering to those who use it for recreation purposes [:)] ) Nor am I of the persuasion that marijuana use leads to the use of higher end drugs and dope ( as is the stance that is used against the legalization of it )




IrishMist -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 6:05:34 AM)

quote:

the problem with any discussion with regard to politics, religion, drugs, etc is that the parties involved all have their respective opinions, and, whether they care to admit it or not, pretty much have no interest in really having their opinions swayed.  I, at least, was forthright enough to state that from the start.

While I do agree that these kind of discussions can and do end up being stalemates; I will say this...my stand is not set in stone. In the 20 years that I have worked in law enforcement, I have seen the worse case scenarios that drug use and addiction can lead to. I am very cynical in this respect because of that. However, if I was shown a convincing argument that would sway my opinion, I am more than willing to consider it.




IrishMist -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 6:10:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: lighthearted

just because help is available doesn't mean it's GOING TO WORK.  it also doesn't mean that the addict WILL AGREE TO PARTICIPATE.  if it was simply a matter of available resources then THE RATE OF RELAPSE WOULD BE 0%. 




        We cannot eradicate drugs, nor the need of people to alter their consciousness.  Addiction would be better dealt with without the criminal aspect.  Safe, reliable doses would go a long way to preventing overdoses.  Drugs not loaded with street impurities, or made with toxic substitutions would save a lot more lives.

         Harm reduction is the better option, until they decide to quit and mean it.

Now this is the best post I have seen so far. You are correct in saying that we can not eradicate drugs nor peoples needs to use them. However, I disagree that legalization will lead to less drug related crimes.

Yes, it would remove the crimes that are related to those who commit them in search of their fix. But what about those crimes that happen AFTER a person has taken the drug? They are just as serious and fatal. How do you find a way to lower these crimes?




lighthearted -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 6:10:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Greetings lighthearted,

Yeah I know alot of people make up their mind on something, and then close it. Rather than just give a blanket opinion, state some reasons (not emotions) that keeping it criminalized will make things better.

My Uncle died of a speed overdose, I have lost four very close friends to speed, heroin and cocaine, there are many people within the mindset that illicit drugs should be legal, that have had a family member die. I guess going to a sleazy hotel, breaking the door in, picking making my friend pack, taking her and locking her away until she could get treatment, you know during those withdrawl symptoms, and beating the shit out of her pimp, does not count for dealing personally with an addict. Sorry for your lose, but it is your choice to not even consider another view on it with reason and logic. You do not corner the market on emotion about this issue.

You call it berate, and I call it response in a discussion. If you do not wish to discuss, then stop posting remarks on the issue.

Not sure what you mean about the unborn child and bong hits. Sounds like another "what about the kids?" sound bite, rather than offer rational points against the issues.

Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: lighthearted

hello Orion,

the problem with any discussion with regard to politics, religion, drugs, etc is that the parties involved all have their respective opinions, and, whether they care to admit it or not, pretty much have no interest in really having their opinions swayed.  I, at least, was forthright enough to state that from the start.

just because my feelings are emotional doesn't mean they are irrational.  find me more than one random person who has had a family member die from a drug overdose that is in favor of legalizing drugs and I will be happy to listen to what they have to say. 

I'm confused by your need to berate me.  I don't feel the need to be paranoid of every piece of information that tells me something I don't want to hear and cry, it must be a government conspiracy!  the real question here, is, why take a chance on the health of an unborn baby?  because you haven't been convinced?  put the bong down!  it's easy, right, because pot is not addicting! 



good morning, Orion.

as I said in an earlier post, I won't be swayed.  and if there's too much emotion or not enough fact there for you, I'm sorry.  I refuse to live a life governed solely by reason alone; my emotions make me human, and drug issues are far more emotional and human issues than they are legal issues.  I suppose I could sit here and list a dozen facts, statistics, etc to back up my case, but why?  they would fall on deaf ears, I have a feeling. 

I'm glad that your heroic actions saved your friend.  I'm sorry your uncle died.  my brother is not the only person whose I know personally whose life was ruined by drug use.  your experiences that helped you form your opinion are not my experiences. my opinion in this matter, as I stated in my original post, are strong enough to make them immovable.

I should have been a bit more clear in my last post to fartle; I am finished with posting on this topic.

have a great day...we're making tamales today in our household...




SeeksOnlyOne -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 6:12:20 AM)

i say if willie nelson can use pot in lieu of valium, then so can i(we)yall.........i wouldnt wanna imply i ever broke a law of course[sm=cool.gif]




NorthernGent -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 6:34:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: uwinceismile

is legalizing drugs a good idea to you? i tend to think its a bad idea. but my own history with drugs and alcohol bias me tremendously



Yeah, legalise the lot. Provide everyone with the benefit of research/shared knowledge/information - good and bad - and let people live their lives. See how it goes, and providing the whole show doesn't go tits up with drug-fuelled anti-social behaviour and a spiralling tax burden, then there's no need for anyone to step in and administer the situation.




Alumbrado -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 6:38:39 AM)

quote:

However, I disagree that legalization will lead to less drug related crimes.

Yes, it would remove the crimes that are related to those who commit them in search of their fix. But what about those crimes that happen AFTER a person has taken the drug? They are just as serious and fatal. How do you find a way to lower these crimes?


In addition, I've always been a litle suspicious of the notion that those criminals making money by selling drugs would suddenely turn into non-criminals at the stroke of a repeal pen.


quote:

Look into the history of the Controlled Substance Act, look into why the domain was changed from being under the surgeon general to the atty general, look at how Nixon was beset by those in the peace movement at the time, look at other movements that had started and how he viewed them. The criminalization of drugs was a weapon against citizens involved in certain movements that the politically elite wanted removed as a thord in their side. 


Actually the war on drugs (starting with pot), took place decades before Nixon was president.  Research Harry J. Anslinger



quote:

  unless your a man attempting to father children; longterm use damages sperm.  and that is soooo not sexy.


I believe that the research claiming damage turned out to be bogus, but that more recent work suggests some effect on motility, which can certainly interfere with reproduction,, Then again who wants kids that are just going to sit around listening to the Dead?[8D]



quote:

  Harm reduction is the better option,


Yep.




stella40 -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 7:05:36 AM)

I don't think drugs should be legalized.

In these debates people always come up with the 'parallel' argument of tobacco and alcohol being legal and marijuana not being legal. So why not legalize heroin and cocaine, as both are less addictive than nicotine? I've met quite a few people who've smoked heavily over 40 years. I've even met a few people who've been drinking heavily over a number of years, and some of them are quite pickled. However I've yet to meet a long term heroin user or crack addict.

People mention the tax that could come in as a result of legalizing drugs. Oh sure, and I can just see the drug barons and the other assorted gangsters fighting amongst themselves for a place in the queue to the Tax Inspector's office.

Of course just like with tobacco and alcohol the big companies and corporations would muscle in and fight for their market share, and so the substances you use would end up costing you much more than you think.

Added to which this would bring more exploitation, poverty and crime to the Third World which, in my opinion, already has more than enough exploitation, poverty and crime to deal with.

Sometimes we have to stop and think about the bigger issues. Legalizing drugs in my opinion will only lead to an increase in using drugs and an increase in crime - not the trafficking or dealing which will be legalized but the more undesirable crimes connected with drugs - the violent crimes, the muggings, thefts, shootings and murders.

I don't use recreational drugs, but I have nothing against those people who do. Your body, your life, your issue. However I feel that decriminalization is a better way of managing drugs than legalizing them.  




TheHeretic -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 7:35:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist
But what about those crimes that happen AFTER a person has taken the drug? They are just as serious and fatal. How do you find a way to lower these crimes?



           I'm afraid you've lost me a bit, Irish.  If you mean crimes like driving while impaired, I think that has been covered.  If you mean things like speed freaks having violent, psychotic episodes, I'm going to argue that many of the worst effects of methamphetamine today were much rarer when the drugs were first developed in laboratories, possibly being side effects of the toxic, substitute ingredients.  Again, I say harm reduction.

      If you mean something like a Manson family, eating acid every day and spree killing by night, I don't have a handy answer.  I don't think we'll ever eliminate crazy people any more than we will addicts.  Being high would certainly be no defense in a court of law.

        




NeedToUseYou -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 9:40:09 AM)

My view is legalizing pot is a good trial run, if that works well, legalize LSD, or some other low addiction drug and work your way up. This way if assumptions are wrong you didn't go all in feet first.

I honestly do think it would have very little impact on increasing drug use. Most people have acquired pot illegally, and smoked it. Every Pot dealer I've ran into had access to heavier drugs either sporadically or permanently. So, Pot is a good candidate for legalization, since it would remove the teeny boppers from running to the drug dealers for pot, and they'd just steal the occasional joint from daddy's pack.

I'm more apprehensive the higher the addiction rate goes. Pot is near the lowest addicting drug, LSD has no physical addiction properties. So, those would be the two I'd be in favor of legalizing. If that happened at least the drug dealers would be relegated to only serving the hard drugs, and you wouldn't get the hard drug users co-mingling with the softer drugs.

I see no downside or debate in legalizing low addiction drugs. The others like meth, I can see potential benefits and disadvantages.

edited to change LCD to LSD. LOL. I type computer stuff to much.




queencaliph -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 10:13:10 AM)

One point I will make and I think most people will agree with.  What we are doing now to deal with the drug problem is not working and discussions like this one need to take place on a wider scale until we as a society start coming up with solutions that will work. 




Sinergy -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 10:24:25 AM)

 
What always puzzles me about anti drug types is they can never really answer the question:

Why is alcohol legal and other drugs illegal?
 
Sure, addiction is a bad thing.  Overuse is a bad thing.  Operative heavy equipment under the influence is a bad thing.  Lives are destroyed by using either of them.  Societal resources are used dealing with the after-effects of addiction to these substances.

And yet...

Alcohol is legal.

Why?  What makes alcohol so special that it can have all the bad outcomes it has and still be legal?

Sinergy

p.s.  From a historical perspective, the only thing that prohibition of alcohol did was drive the cost of the drug up, result in lots and lots of killings and deaths, require massive amounts of money to support the police as they made war on alcohol, create very sophisticated and large scale organized crime networks, and ultimately result in it being repealed as a stupid amendment.




thompsonx -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 11:13:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist

Hi Orion

Why do I believe that drug use will go up if it is legalized?

Simple. We all know that there is no way in hell that the government will EVER legalize the really ‘wanted’ drugs like heroine, cocaine, meth, LSD, etc.
No, WE all do not know that the government will ever legalize the really "wanted" drugs.
How do you know that the aforementioned drugs are the really "wanted" drugs?  Is it because your job depends on keeping drugs illegal?  Ask yourself a very simple question.  If all drugs were made legal tomorrow morning would you start using them?  If your answer is yes then you are a hypocrite.  If your answer is no then why would you expect anyone else to do so.
Those who do drugs have not stopped because they are illegal.  Those who do not do drugs will not start because they become legal.


Whether we want to believe it or not, it is not weed that is causing the drug problem in the world; it is these much harder to attain drugs.
If this is so then why are so many pot smokers in the slammer?  Heroin,coke and speed are no more difficult to obtain than weed.

In addition, you have to look at youngins. Since the pushers will no longer need to push the drugs on adults ( or what the government refers to as adults ), they will turn their attention to the underage groups ( grade school, middle school, high school ). These are the ones that can not ‘buy’ the newly legalized drugs because the government says they are too young.
Do you mean like alcohol and tobacco are illegal for the "youngins'".  Get a grip it is a parents job to raise their kids not the state.  This is such a lame arguement.


So, here we have adults; who are going to be buying these newly legalized drugs; and younginsargument who are going to want to test and try what their peers and parents are so happy about.
This is not borne out by the example in the Netherlands.

Legalization = drug explosion of massive porportions
Is this like the "domino theory" that took us to Viet Nam?  Where drugs have been legalized there has been no massive explosion of usage.

I have been around long enough behind the scenes to see nothing more than a disaster in the making if drugs of this kind are in any way legalized.
What precisely is your "behind the scenes" expertise?

Of course, this is just my own experience talking, coupled with my opinion.
Your "experience and opinion" seem to be at odds with reality.




farglebargle -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 11:30:35 AM)

quote:


Why? What makes alcohol so special that it can have all the bad outcomes it has and still be legal?


Taxes?





thompsonx -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 12:20:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lighthearted

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

Cant recall any problems caused by somebody doing bong loads. 

Sinergy


unless your a man attempting to father children; longterm use damages sperm.  and that is soooo not sexy.


lighthearted:
Perhaps you could link us to the government sponsored website that contains this startling tidbit of knowledge.
The oldest culture in the world (they were old 6000 years ago when the ancient Egyptians wrote about them) have been smoking marijuana since before we bipeds learned how to write.  Yeah they are still smokin' that shit, still makin' babies,still don't have a word for rape or murder.
thompson




thompsonx -> RE: Drug Legalization (7/7/2007 12:25:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lighthearted

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy


In this corner, we have the sorrow and horror of alcoholism and the destruction of lives, environment, property.

In this corner, we have some stoner dude who cant add more people to the gene pool, listens to too much Credence Clearwater Revival and Jefferson Airplane, and makes his living glassing surfboards and saying "Dude" too frequently.

How long do I have to think about which drug makes more sense to be legalized?

This might take a while.  (puts on his Thinking Cap)

Sinergy


well, having had both an alchoholic in the family and also a long-term pot-smoking family member, I would have to say that both can cause the destruction of lives, enviroment and property.  and that requires no thinking cap on my part.


lighthearted:
Is it possible that the problems these two individuals caused was because they were assholes and not because of the drugs they used?
thompson




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875