MasterHephaestus
Posts: 6
Joined: 9/24/2005 Status: offline
|
I’m seeing several different issues in this post and will try to address them all from my personal perspective. First I would like to state the I’m going to stick with the terms Master and slave simply because I don’t want to spend all of my time typing Master/Mistress Dom/me slave/sub so that I can encompass everything. When I speak of Master and slave, though the terms are often limited to M/s relationship, I’m talking about everyone in a power exchange dynamic. In a M/s dynamic the slave subjugates their will to the master. It could be assumed then that the slave wishes to be, do, and function as their master wishes. Therefore, when a slave fails to follow their master’s will, for whatever reason, they should expect to be corrected so that they can continue to learn and grow to become more in line with the master’s plan. If they DON’T expect to be corrected then they probably shouldn’t be with their master as this situation defeats the M/s dynamic. Conversely, when the slave IS functioning well in regards to their masters will the mere fact that they are functioning as specified, not needing correction, and that their master is pleased with them is in itself a reward. Having said that, however, we recognize that slaves are still human beings and most slaves require some kind of positive reinforcement or recognition that they ARE, in fact, being pleasing, in order to continue on their present course of action. When the master is pleased with his property he MAY, in his own fashion and of his own choice, decide to reward his property in some way. I think that it would be a trap, however, to get into the mindset of “I’ll do as I’m told so I can be rewarded.” A slave is not there to serve and be pleasing so they can be rewarded. A slave is there because they wish to serve their master, in whatever capacity is required. Personally, if I were to take a domestic slave to take care of the house and they performed adequately I would probably reward them with something because I was pleased with their behavior. If I were to bring someone into the house that EXPECTED to be rewarded for their service I could just as easily hire a housekeeper and reward them with their pay. Everyone has needs and those needs should be met if a relationship is to work. I believe both positive and negative reinforcement are necessary for a emotionally balanced relationship. If my car breaks down and is no longer functioning efficiently then I correct the situation if I wish to enjoy continued use of my car. If I enjoy my car and want to buy more flashy tires or a better set of headlights I would do so but I don’t do those things BECAUSE my car continues to function normally. I’m simply pleased with my car and since I’m going to keep it a while longer I’ll jazz it up a bit. It’s a sketchy analogy because my car (I try to pretend) does not have feelings to contend with. Is it healthy to reward a slave that pleases you? I believe so, if they can understand that they are not being rewarded for the good or obedient behavior itself but rather the fact that I am well pleased. Is it required? Technically speaking I don’t think it is a requirement but I should take into consideration that solely negative reinforcement can be psychologically damaging for a long term relationship. Either way, it’s a master’s prerogative to demonstrate to a slave that he is pleased with them. Let’s take you example that a slave prepares a really wonderful dinner. There are other parameters to consider: Was she required to make dinner? If so, she functioning as required. If she was required to make dinner but had spent the day misbehaving and thus displeasing her master, should the simple fact that she did as was told and made dinner be something her master should reward? Was this something she did out of love to make her master happy? If so, and her master was pleased, should she EXPECT to get a reward for it? I would think that if a slave were doing something like that out of love and expected a reward for it…well… to me that doesn’t seem like an act of love any more. The short answer, to me, is this: The master may reward their slave as he sees fit, when he sees fit. The master may correct their slave as he sees fit, when he sees fit. -Edited to fix formatting issues
< Message edited by MasterHephaestus -- 7/8/2007 10:14:52 AM >
|