lapresence
Posts: 94
Joined: 1/24/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wwwkevinww
I cannot believe Madrabbit is trying to correct my grammar. you don't even say what you really mean, you miss "next" sentence in what I quoted.....
"We have sentences in the English language so we can express a single train of thought completely, not so we can express one thing and then in the sentence, express the complete opposite."
In case you're clueless, which you are, next is needed to actually say what you mean.....
you highlighted Lol, as the L was not appropriate, every time you start a new sentence, it should start with a capital...."
I don't care about grammar, and know I say your when I mean you're, but I also know what I mean, and when I say "IF SO" in the next sentence, its because I'm not interested in giving fuel to the flaming.
I generally don't bother to ask questions of those I'm insulting or trying to insult, because there isn't much point. It shows a pretty inane quality to think your tricking anyone, or that I would share personal info so you could insult me....
I find it amusing that the moderator is allowing only one sided flaming......-worse, I find it distasteful to destroy or edit my thoughts, and therefore do not particular like moderators.....
there are alot of idiots walking around on this planet, and I can see several when they attempt to attack me, try to refute what I say, and do so with NO facts to back them up, no evidence, and try to say my logic or information is lacking....
I'm not flaming, I wish you all the best. And it hasn't been one-sided; you've attacked a man's post about his own relationships and feelings and you know nothing about them. I'm saying what you've said lacks any form of citation, or any convincing proof of what you've claimed. I'll even say you might be right; I haven't done any real research on the topic. I'd have to spend way too much of my time wading through peer-reviewed journals for my taste. And I don't care enough about the topic of romantic love to bother. Self-help books are not facts, and I do not find them interesting or enlightening as more than opinion, and I rarely waste my time on such drivel.
I personally believe that human emotion is beyond setting everything in nice neat little boxes. And emotions are really above qualifying and quantifying, in my own personal opinion. Maybe that is why I've never cared for psychology; give me anthropology any day. And I'm sure many agree with me. And sharing one's feelings in regards to a matter, even if it's been said before by some random stranger, is not plagiarism.
And what information have you provided? That article would hold no weight in academia. They might say it is an interesting start to a study, but they would say that it needs more work before it would really be considered. I've tried telling you that and I told you where you could look to find a lot of information on qualifying a professional and rigorous study. Since you stated your hypothesis, the ball is in your court to defend. I have seen no proof, just something that you remember. I'm an academic at heart, and I dislike people totting facts that people might believe without evidence. If you can't prove your fact then withdraw it as fact. Simple as that, no harm no foul.
As for the grammar comment, I wasn't going to make it, even though it was bugging me. But you both missed it, and since y'all wanted to focus on grammar I thought I'd turn in a lesson. I like to teach, can't you tell? LOL. Honestly though, don't take my attack on what you've written here personally. I was hoping you would see my point, and since you were totting science on your side, I thought I would illustrate your error in regards to science.
|
RE: Love within Authority Dynamics - 
Profile
(I'm taking it as debating that they are doing) 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread