MadRabbit
Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wwwkevinww
lapresence said this...you don't like psychology, you are ruled by your emotion, you don' want to be logical (logical as in things put in "nice neat boxes"). You prefer anthropology to psychology....peer reviews? You haven't really read what I said, a fact is a fact whether people realize it or not....earth is flat, people might like to debate it, not believe it, or whatever, but the earth is flat. its a fact. lol or is the earth round....you get my point, its not debatable....it doesn't matter what you believe....
what I stated as a fact no one has disproven. Alot of women think emotions are more important than thinking, and aren't that logical. Caring more about how something is said that what is actually being said.
Its pointless to argue logic with someone who is illogical.....
Yeah, it is! So perhaps thats why we are not argueing with you.
The fact of the matter is a lot of what you are saying here has been disapproven by common experiences shared by many people here and experiences and understanding of polygamous dynamics...clearly something you are lacking.
The facts you have presented here about love are in fact, not facts...merely theory and tid bits of folk wisdom from people who have had some shared experiences.
Love is an emotion. How people process, feal, and understand love changes from person to person. There is no universal fact like "The world is flat" that applies to how everyone experiences and processes this emotion.
It is an emotion that in itself is illogical and therefore trying to create logical models for how it works is an entirely flawed premise. Its the same as trying to create a logical and linear model for a system like the weather that works off chaos like you would for a system like a coffee maker that works off order.
Further more, the whole basis of your arguments against KoM's relationship is flawed logic You are essentially equating love to that of the power of a car battery. Limited and confined by law...the more power you give towards one thing, the less that is left for someone else. That somehow the love one feals for one person is diminished because of the less amount of time they have to spend with someone else.
The "scientific fact" you are presenting is essentially the intensity of the emotion is linked to the amount of time a person spends with a person.
Wow....how fucking genius....amazing...
Gee...apparently when I had to work two jobs and I couldnt spend time with my ex girlfriend in the past, the way I felt towards her drastically changed. That somehow because I was devoting my energy to other things that I actually loved her less. That if she had called me at work and told me she seriously needed me, I wont have dropped what I was doing and went to be with her out of my love for her like I would have if I had been spending all my time with her.
Wow...apparently...all this time, when my father and mother chose to have two more children, the amount they loved me was drastically reduced by 66%. I guess that explains why they didnt pay for college.
Apparently, because I only get to see my father once every week as opposed to everyday when we lived together, the amount of love I feal for him is somehow less. That I wont go out in the pouring rain at 3am to change his tire because I love him less.
If somehow the intensity of the emotion was somehow linked to time spent, then what about the folk wisdom regarding the shared experience of "Absence makes the heart grow yonder."?
You ever consider that maybe this so called fact that a man cannot share eros love with two women is a belief stemming from social contigencies toward monogamy, our own twisted perspectives regarding viewing lovers as possesions, and our fealings of jealousy?
Maybe you are so horribly insecure that you trully believe that your girlfriend cannot have romantic love with another man without still loving you just the same...doesnt mean everyone else doesnt.
Many arguments have been presented here that completely diffuse what you are saying and these arguments are based on shared and common experiences that tell us you are in fact WRONG. I dont need to present scientific documentation that a knife will most likely cut my skin if used on my arm because its a shared, common experience that everyone knows and understands.
Unfortanely, you have your head so far up your ass that you are failing to realize that you are the one who is wrong and not everyone else who has posted to this thread.
_____________________________
Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions
Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY
|
RE: Love within Authority Dynamics - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread