Caius
Posts: 175
Joined: 2/2/2005 Status: offline
|
Well, there are various options to consider, as some have suggested, and really, bound to be something that would fit with just about anyone's aesthetic, so long as they don't object to it on principle alone. And if he dismisses these, well, alsoas others have said, you'll have to decide how comfortable you are moving into this dynamic. Something eating away at you is bad way to start out, especially if it's over the primary symbol. And while I think HardnRuff was tactless in his approach, he has something of a point -- this is a traditional symbol, and a traditional part of it is that it is typically -- though certainly not exclusively -- a one way symbol, so, if your dom has been so-long connected with prototypical bdsm ideals, this may be a crucial aspect for him. Regardless, I'm sure if the relationship is worth having, you'll work it out. Consider this, though... The collar may be on you, but it doesn't necesarily speak for just you. I think you might be suprised, once that collar is on, just how eager your dom is to be seen next to you frequently enough to make it obvious enough who put it around yout neck. Hardly a universal, of course, but common enough phenomena, I would think. In the end, I think there are many more subtle factors that imply ownership or co-possesion tahn the most obvious symbols. Of course, a collar is unmistakable, but many wear them that don't share a concept as to its meaning. Likewise, many don't but will clearly telecast their devotion to someone, especially in their presence but sometimes even without. But if you really feel you do need some kind of physical 'mark,' as you say, to identify him when away from you, how about having very obvious loud sex with him at his place of work? Or you could urinate on all of his clothes. Either/or.
< Message edited by Caius -- 7/10/2007 3:23:39 AM >
|