ErusDespicienta
Posts: 32
Joined: 4/30/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BitaTruble For the purpose of this post BDSM is defined as bondage, discipline and sadomasochism (actually that's the way I always define it, but I digress). If you want to define it as something else, more power to you, but this is my OP and I'm speaking on this subject as it pertains to my viewpoints. BDSM isn't and shouldn't be the big umbrella. It's too narrow in focus but for some reason it has become almost a catch all for anything that's not vanilla. Well, we already have a catch all for anything that's not vanilla.. and that's 'alternative'. BDSM is a subset of that, just as is M/s, D/s, leather, gay, goth, cross-dressing, spankos, vamp etc. If it's not vanilla, it's alternative to vanilla.. but that does not equal BDSM. I partake of all the elements of BDSM. I adore bondage, really get off on s/m, discipline is good for my character and I embrace is as a means of growth but the life I live is M/s under the umbrella of alternative. .. unless of course it all changes. Happy Friday, everyone. Celeste Oh ! I think BDSM is absolutely an umbrella , an umbrella under which any amount of alternative lifestyles or fetishes can gather. It's a meeting place, a union perhaps of all the lifestyles and behaviours that the mainstream public seek to subdue, punish and or eradicate. ESPN is an umbrella under which any amount of sports or competitive events can gather. It's a place you can go where you know your favourite sport will at some time be featured. A place where your sport will be accepted and shown off. Of course there's always going to be someone who thinks cricket isn't a sport and anyone who doesn't love baseball isn't playing with a full deck. ESPN is not a sport. BDSM is not a lifesyle. Happy Friday..
_____________________________
You can't always get what you want but if try, sometimes, you might get what you need.~~ Rolling Stones
|