Alumbrado
Posts: 5560
Status: offline
|
Still waiting for the other shoe to drop. We all should have learned that the inhabitants of this planet are categorized acording to kingdom, species, and so forth, in our 4th or 5th grade earth or general science classes. So what is the point of belaboring the obvious? The results from the Genome Project regarding the lack of usefullness of 'race' as a biological definition is old news, confirming an even older belief. So what is the point of bringing that up at this late date? And is is hardly a trade secret that academic disciplines are divided into multiple categories, with some focusing on individual or organic factors and others focusing on societal or environmental ones. Likewise, we should already know that the use of terms varies from field to field...tangent in mathematics and tangent in literature carry different usages. Again, thoroughly worn out in high school, so, once more, what is the point of repeating ancient trivia, as though one were inventing or teaching anything new? On the other hand, what exactly is the point of denying that any other than biological disciplines are science, or applying the term in a manner implying exclusivity for genetic taxonomy? And again, what is the point of promoting the ignorance of the fact that race exists as a very real, scientific, and even axiomatic concept in law, criminology, sociology, econometrics, medicine, et al? So far, all I'm hearing is the sound of one jaw flapping... but still no explanation of what the point is.
< Message edited by Alumbrado -- 8/5/2007 7:58:33 AM >
|