IrishMist
Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
First, while speech restrictions were always a part of D/s, Really? Well shit, that's a new one on me. quote:
never was this idea of letting your prospective Dom monitor all your communications from the get go condoned in the BDSM community. So YOU say. quote:
NO! Restricting access to others communicating with you is dangerous I generally do agree with this. quote:
This is not the practice at all in real world D/s socializing And you KNOW this because? quote:
But now "UNDER CONSIDERATION" has become a practice being used by stalkers, abusers, etc. to monitor a girl's mail and sometimes to keep others from relaying caution stories about the person a sub is about to submit too. There is inherent danger to this practice and if a Dom demands this - RUN! I assume that you are personally acquainted with ALL those who now use this? I mean, how else are YOU to know that they are stalkers, abusers, etc? quote:
But even to a lesser degree, accepting restrictions from talking to others right off the bat, particularly if you are an inexperienced sub, is very bad news as it limits your ability to hear warnings about unsafe play from other Doms or Dommes and use other people as sounding boards. I would have to question the person who feels the NEED to send such stories to another who is already in the process of talking with another. Sounds to me like the person NEEDING to warn the other is riding an ego trip. /shrug Of course, all of this is the fault of the stalkers and the abusers who use this phrase. No fault can be laid at the feet of the 'unsuspecting' submissive. I mean, let's face it, they are just weak minded individuals who under no circumstances should use any form of common sense. At least, that is what I am understanding from your post.
_____________________________
If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.
|