SusanofO
Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005 Status: offline
|
There might be adifference, but I do think it's ingrained in our society - and not the fault of female Dommes. I don't understand why people object to this, really. It's a bit like asking why there is a difference between men and women, regardless of their social "roles". If there isn't any difference - well, then why are we (at least or maybe just especially, the heterosexuals) here in the first place? I think it's one reason some men actually do appreciate things like financial domination from some female Pros (not that I'd engage in it, but I understand it) and I think I understand why it exists in the first place - because some men do associate "footing the bill" with being masculine - it is seen by some as a part of their role as a "protective being" toward females - no matter what their D/s "role" might be - it's something, a contribution they can make to a relationship with a female that some (many) men seem to consider part of their masculinity - this isn't just the fault of females. Males (both Doms and subs) perpetuate this as well as females. And I think it does actually have some merit socially - since females are pretty much "spent" and helpless after giving birth, looking after babies, etc. and in no position to look out for themselves at that point in time, really. That kind of mind-set, IMO, still carries over into other social situations today, whether it's valid or not, I guess. That is the reason I think it exists. But then - so do some of the expectations and ideas that are perpetuated by male Dominants that may have no validity in much of the "real world" . Take that idea of a "Natural order". Hmmm. Maybe it's realisitc and truly valid. If nothing else, it can be a romantic, justifiable-sounding jusitification for a Male Dominant-female submissive relationship. Then again, maybe the fact that Dommes (and male submissives) exist at all is a result of people simply having different biological drives, too (and not religious,or mythical ones, or even more modern social ones). I understand your position and the question,and I think you're a really smart and a neat guy, SimplyMichael but, I think I'd still feel a bit turned off by a man who expected me to financially support him forever, or foot the bill for every single date. I'll be willing to pitch in financially, I'll buy gifts, etc - but I won't assume the entire financial burden in a relationship - not for any man, Dominant or submissive. Is that "sexist" of me? Maybe. But IMO, it's pretty sexist of a male Dom to expect a female submissive to swoon with delight at the idea of doing things like housework all day, too (if that is a requirement of their male Dominant, for instance). - Susan
< Message edited by SusanofO -- 8/19/2007 2:01:32 PM >
_____________________________
"Hope is the thing with feathers, That perches in the soul, And sings the tune without the words, And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson
|