Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme??


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/8/2005 11:16:13 PM   
SteelBondager


Posts: 86
Joined: 5/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I put a line at the end of my profile that says insert the word "crimson" in your note to show me that you have read this far.


I noticed that in your profile. That's just rare enough to be effective, I'd wager.

Myself, I'm not exactly overwhelmed with emails from eager potentials throwing themselves at me. The last thing I need is another hurdle to that first email finding me.

_____________________________

http://steelbondager.blogsome.com/ - Thoughts of a Modern Bondager

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/8/2005 11:43:23 PM   
Gemeni


Posts: 255
Joined: 2/19/2005
Status: offline
Jasmyn wrote:

quote:

Funny, I was thinking it was not pc in this community for Dom/Dommes to state anything that might call into question anyone else's idea of 'submission', despite that fact a lot of what people are wanting to engage in ISN'T giving up control, but rather controlling what it is they give up and labelling it 'submission'.



Which is usually what is meant when a Dominant dares to say "you aren't a submissive".

After which, a great deal of caterwauling is generally heard from the bottom who was so offended at being pegged to the mat, like a bug with a pin through it.

It would be nice if people could just be honest about who they ARE.

It's not as if there aren't enough service tops to go around....Why pester a Dominant, who is willing to invest more than a beating and a quick fuck?

(in reply to Jasmyn)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 12:45:23 AM   
CalliopePurple


Posts: 2539
Joined: 11/29/2004
From: SeaTac area
Status: offline
I actually have to encourage pet to tell me more of her wishes and thoughts otherwise she'd be quite content picking up everything I desired as her own. Some people like that, I don't because I know it's the remnants of how she was raised and I make it clear that I expect her to say her opinions, even if it differs from mine.

_____________________________

Kimi ni aitakute dare yori mo aitakute
hajimete kimi ni atta hoshizora no shita de.
Kimi ni tsutaetai todokanai omoi demo
boku no kokoro wa mada kimi o sagashiteiru.

Gackt - Kimi ni Aitakute

(in reply to Gemeni)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 8:41:36 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelBondager

quote:

I put a line at the end of my profile that says insert the word "crimson" in your note to show me that you have read this far.


I noticed that in your profile. That's just rare enough to be effective, I'd wager.

Myself, I'm not exactly overwhelmed with emails from eager potentials throwing themselves at me. The last thing I need is another hurdle to that first email finding me.


Well just because someone has put the word there doesn't mean they are my match made in heaven. But it means that they have at least read through, though not necessarily assimilated, all my profile. It does help with the weeding process though.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to SteelBondager)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 8:48:05 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gemeni

Jasmyn wrote:

quote:

Funny, I was thinking it was not pc in this community for Dom/Dommes to state anything that might call into question anyone else's idea of 'submission', despite that fact a lot of what people are wanting to engage in ISN'T giving up control, but rather controlling what it is they give up and labelling it 'submission'.


Which is usually what is meant when a Dominant dares to say "you aren't a submissive".


Which was exactly my point. We all have different criteria. And for each of us, there are people that are good matches. If someone needs someone who is “no limits” type person, then they are searching for a particular kind of person. To say that only this type of person is a submissive is what many in this thread have referred to as one way truism.

But to say that because a submissive is assertive, they are "foot stomping subs, topping from the bottom" is a judgement that I personally find simply incorrect.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to Gemeni)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 3:40:54 PM   
MsIncognito


Posts: 742
Joined: 5/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jasmyn

Funny, I was thinking it was not pc in this community for Dom/Dommes to state anything that might call into question anyone else's idea of 'submission', despite that fact a lot of what people are wanting to engage in ISN'T giving up control, but rather controlling what it is they give up and labelling it 'submission'.



Actually, I agree with you and don't think that's contradictory to my original statement. My point was that if bottoms weren't viewed in such a negative light by the community in general (I've seen it both online and in real life) people wouldn't feel the need to misrepresent themselves - that goes for bottoms and Tops alike. "Bottom" and "Service Top" are such dirty words in our community and until that changes you're going to get lots and lots of people on both sides of the slash misrepresenting themselves.

(in reply to Jasmyn)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 4:53:52 PM   
stormsfate


Posts: 849
Joined: 2/1/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

fate,

I completely understand what you are trying to say. This man has a right to his opinion. But his post is nothing more then a rant that says "Why won't all the girls here just submit to me? They mustn't be real subs." It's the tone in which he dismisses all those that do not want to play his game as something real.



I'm relieved because I was starting to get a complex about my communication skills...lol. Not necessary for anyone to agree with me, but it troubles me when I can't at least make myself understood.

I'm just at a loss as to why some get reamed for this type of rant, and yet others can post threads along the lines of " Is he a Real True Dom/Master or a phoney?" and have people actually respond in a negative sense...i.e. no, he isn't "real" or "true" and that's just fine. Question a Dominant and you fit right in...question a submissive and hell hath no fury.


best regards,
fate

_____________________________

Vision? What do you know about MY vision? My vision would turn your world upside down, tear asunder your illusions and the sanctuary of your own ignorance crashing down around you! Now ask yourself, are you really ready to see that vision? [/size

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 5:30:19 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
I think you have wonderful communication skills fate, at least from what I've read.

Now you are absolutely right. Why do some people get called on for being fake and others not, I'm not sure. I can tell you that I chose not to participate to the thread you are refering to. I would have not encouraged someone being refered to as a fake.

I can only speak for myself and say that I have been quite consistent in my argument that just because someone doesn't seem submissive or dominant to you, that is because they probably aren't the right match for you.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to stormsfate)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 5:44:08 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsIncognito

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jasmyn

Funny, I was thinking it was not pc in this community for Dom/Dommes to state anything that might call into question anyone else's idea of 'submission', despite that fact a lot of what people are wanting to engage in ISN'T giving up control, but rather controlling what it is they give up and labelling it 'submission'.



Actually, I agree with you and don't think that's contradictory to my original statement. My point was that if bottoms weren't viewed in such a negative light by the community in general (I've seen it both online and in real life) people wouldn't feel the need to misrepresent themselves - that goes for bottoms and Tops alike. "Bottom" and "Service Top" are such dirty words in our community and until that changes you're going to get lots and lots of people on both sides of the slash misrepresenting themselves.


I think that is an excellent point MsIncognito. I've often discussed how I think that the labels we chose limit us and constrain us to be.

Now I don't want this to be interpreted as a stab at the Collarme staff because I know it is all based on volunteer work. This is simply an observation of our current reality for identification on this site. The 4 categories to identify with here are Dominant, submissive, slave or switch. No sadist, no masochist, no top, no bottom, no S&M switch, no into the kinky stuff, no into this 24/7, etc. Perhaps one day we will have it but unfortunately, for the moment, we have to fit within one of those 4 categories.

So we have to be more honest in our description of ourselves in our profiles which is not an easy thing to do. More then that, we have to talk amongst ourselves to get to know each other slowly <GASP!> with no guarantee that we aren’t “wasting our time on a not sure thing”.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to MsIncognito)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 6:03:00 PM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

Anyone who says they never judge is pretty much a liar.


Hey - I am ellevated to liar status!


Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to Gemeni)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 7:03:57 PM   
dominmd


Posts: 474
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dark~angel

quote:

Anyone who says they never judge is pretty much a liar.


Hey - I am ellevated to liar status!


Peace and Love




How can anyone involved in kink judge another in kink? That would be so against what we are here for.

I no longer judge people. If it is your thing then roll with it. I don't have to accept it, I don't have to like it, but you are being who your are. And I can't judge a person for that.

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/9/2005 8:17:26 PM   
perverseangelic


Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004
From: Davis, Ca
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dominmd
How can anyone involved in kink judge another in kink? That would be so against what we are here for.

I no longer judge people. If it is your thing then roll with it. I don't have to accept it, I don't have to like it, but you are being who your are. And I can't judge a person for that.


I judge people.

I find that no matter how hard I try, I form opions of people based on too little information, and then place those opinions against my preconceptions. I have things that I believe are wrong. Or dumb. Or abusive. Or mysogynstic. And I find that I have an automatic dislike of people that do those things.


That said, and before I get people saying nasty things to me, I've learned something about myself and learned how to do it.

I make these judgements. But because I'm aware of the fact htat I do, I can change things before I act on irrational judgements. I also am aware that -my- morality system isn't the one that eveyroe uses, nor that it should be.

I guess I'm saying that while I believe most people judge, I don't think judging has to be bad. We all operate from our perspective, our morality, our religion. As such, I thin it's hard not to judge people in relaiton to those systems. I think that one has to be aware one's doing it, and make sure one doesn't begin to think that because it appears wrong from where you're standing, it is universally wrong, stupid or untrue.

Anyway, I dunno if that makes sense. It does to me, and I find it works pretty well for me. I still think there are some things that are universally wrong. Violating consent, for one. However, things which I don't think are moral absolutes, I try to remember that just 'cuse itdoesn't work for me doesn't mean it won't work for everyone.

_____________________________

~in the begining it is always dark~

(in reply to dominmd)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 3:59:35 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
When Gemini said -
quote:

quote:

Anyone who says they never judge is pretty much a liar.


That's a mass generalisation - and now, apperently I am a liar. I may think about how someone might be - but I would hardly call that a judgement - I might assume that, because someone has a belief in god, they might be a christian, but further discussion with that person will help me to understand their view. I accept, even if I don't understand.


quote:

I guess I'm saying that while I believe most people judge, I don't think judging has to be bad.


Perverse has it down to a tee - most people judge - its kind of human nature I guess - but not all people do. And to label those that feel differently and don't judge all as liars - is irresponsible and naive. Oh, and a classic judgement.

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 6:29:55 AM   
dominmd


Posts: 474
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
To clarify,

Being relatively new to the public BDSM community I feel that I should not judge people based on their desires or thoughts. Maybe after conversations and seeing them interact with others I will form an opinion of them but certainly not judge them. But this in the community of BDSM.

Now in the vanilla world, it is a different story. My job requires that I make a judgement of people relatively quickly. This process spans only a few seconds, and is usually correct. Correct enough that it has saved my hide more than once or even three times. So on thinking about this for a bit, I DO judge people.

I had to clarify after my last post and distinguish between the kink and vanilla side of me.

And, no bad feelings here. It just helped me clarify my point of view.

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 9:28:36 AM   
slavedesires


Posts: 669
Joined: 3/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Handspankingdom
Firstly, I view a requirement of a healthy (mutually rewarding) D's relationships/friendships to be a time investment on both ends, necessitating the exchange of ideas, limits/expectations, and intent (whether 24/7 or otherwise). To this extent, I embrace patience and a period of getting to know one another (both on the D's level and vanilla interests) to share ideas/thoughts and possibly finding someone to click with all of this.

I have sent notes to a few potential submissive females, however I have been greatly disappointed with their responses (one liners seeking pictures) and ability to communicate/relay their thougts as they pertain to D's. Indeed, a few subs don't really seem to grasp the concept of submitting at all, by starting with limits and then listing their likes and dislikes/do's and don'ts. While it is helpful to share such expectations, etc., if one makes a sincere effort (time investment) to get to know someone with respect to their pursuit in a D's relationship, wouldn't the trust level achieved make the sub comfortable with her dom? Isn't this what submitting is all about? Or are many here just seeking wish fulfillment?

And Wouldn't the dom -- acting responsibly, also take into consideration his/her sub's limits- take them to the edge (pushing limits a bit), without forcing unwanted activities on his/her sub? Isn't the relinquishment of control (of course there are different levels of intent) is what this is all about?

Pardon my noticing, but it seems many subs here are seeking wish fulfillment (rather than serving) and are unwilling to take the time to invest in a deeper involvement (not necessarily romantic), which would in effect instill a level of trust/understanding so necessary for the development of such involvement. By calling ALL the shots (when, where, what, etc.), they are- in actuality, foot stomping subs, topping from the bottom.

Any thoughts?


Welcome to CM.
I agree 100% with this.
I have been quite alarmed, quite frankly, at times when reading submissive profiles at the demands, disrespct, and types of words used by submissives within their profile and journal.....(thus my post on the use of our words)
the demands of ....
I WANT (blah, blah)
YOU WILL (do or else, blah, blah)

And the deep lack of respct confounds me. I have written in my profile, if a stranger came up to you in a library, would you do or say the same if spoken to?
Some respect is due as a human being. The level of that respect changes immeasurably.
When a poor wretched begger puts their hand into your face... do you scream fake/wannabe? spit? puke? respectfully have empthy and walk on? use degrading sarcastic words inthe face of their plight?
Yes we are strangers like unto this in the internet world and deserve a measure of respect as a human being, no matter the type of things we write until proven unworthy of any respect at all.

If submissives only demand and need and feel that what they want is only what they will respond to, then what they might possibly get is ONLY what they will find dscouraging and so called wanna be.

I had planted an Easter lily in my yard after my dad died in 2000. I have nurtured it, tended it, spanked my dogs from laying upon it nd i hve received nothing until this year. I DEMANDED a white Easter lily for it is what i planted in memory of my dad. I fully EXPECTED a white lily. I walked outdoor on Friday to find the most gloreous shade of pink. (I am very sensitiveand emotional) I wept as i found the shade of incredible beauty.
Likewise, submissives will miss out on their hearts desire if they fully DEMAND and EXPECT ONLY what they think is what they want.
A man who knows a girl, is willing to nurture a girl, will bring out the best in her and she may not realize, it is not at All what she DEMANDS and EXPECTS.

Those immature enough.....any age is applied here from 18 to 99.... to think they are ALWAYS right, no matter what have set their boundaries way to tight and will whine when they fail or lash out at others as wannabes. After chats with Doms (mere mortal men) over the last 4 years, i believe this also applies to them.
We change, we evolve or we are stagnant.

Persoanlly, i would love to see submissives write something more personal about themselves, just a tid bit, and then write something like....."I, with a deeper instinct, choose a man who compels my strength, who makes enormous demands on me, who does not doubt my courage or my toughness, who does not believe me naive or innocent, who has the courage to treat me like a woman" - Anais Nin

I have so many more thots on this, but i dont need to share them. They will be shared with the right one if i chose.

~~shy

PS Allow me to add, i believe a submissive should pray daily "I pray that today, My heart might be pure, My mind clear, My spirit submissive, My body strong, My walk holy, and My service honorable."


_____________________________

i speak only my personal opinion, sometimes O/ours.

"i am the keeper of fragile things and i have kept what is indisolvable."
....the greatest gift.....vulnerability

(in reply to Handspankingdom)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 10:05:54 AM   
subcheryl


Posts: 280
Joined: 11/2/2004
Status: offline
Ok I am going to give this a try in understanding or making my opinion on what is said here.




quote:

ORIGINAL: Handspankingdom

Good afternoon all,

I have been a member of collarme.com for approximately two weeks. My experience in the BDSM (primarily D's) world has encompassed 15 years of both on the spiritual and physical level of being a dominant. I wanted to add my thoughts and observations here as a member.

Firstly, I view a requirement of a healthy (mutually rewarding) D's relationships/friendships to be a time investment on both ends, necessitating the exchange of ideas, limits/expectations, and intent (whether 24/7 or otherwise). To this extent, I embrace patience and a period of getting to know one another (both on the D's level and vanilla interests) to share ideas/thoughts and possibly finding someone to click with all of this.


ok you said here that the important thing in this relationship is the communicating of ideas,limits/expectations, and intent, to share ideas/thoughts , and I agree communications is very important both in the bdsm lifestyle and in the "vanilla" world. How can you get to know someone if you don't exchange these things.






I have sent notes to a few potential submissive females, however I have been greatly disappointed with their responses (one liners seeking pictures) and ability to communicate/relay their thougts as they pertain to D's. Indeed, a few subs don't really seem to grasp the concept of submitting at all, by starting with limits and then listing their likes and dislikes/do's and don'ts. While it is helpful to share such expectations, etc., if one makes a sincere effort (time investment) to get to know someone with respect to their pursuit in a D's relationship, wouldn't the trust level achieved make the sub comfortable with her dom? Isn't this what submitting is all about? Or are many here just seeking wish fulfillment?



Perhaps they aren't very sure of how to put their ideas and such down in print, perhaps take one area at a time and discuse this with them, esp if their profile seems to fit what you are looking for. And it is my understanding that esp submissives have the right to limits and guidelines things they will do and things they won't. Some don't realize that the things they won't do could be listed as things to consider if they feel trust in the relationship with potential doms and it is ok for anyone to set limits until they get to know you, are they to let you whip them and not know a thing about you, this is a courting dance you have to do, question, and discuse get to know how they think, what they think and you may get to understand where they come from, for example, my younger sister is exploring this, she is relatively new, when she found out I was into bdsm she could not understand how I would let someone spank me, we come from an abusive background, anyway she was hardset in the beginning that no one was going to hit her, she has done some reading, talked to a dom online, and now admits that once she got so she can trust a dom she could see where it would be sensual, she has her hard limits as I do, I will not involve children in any aspect of this life, I will not do animals, I will not do watersports, or scat. or knifeplay or fireplay, thou the last two again if my Master was into it and I felt he knew what he was doing yes would try it at least once. But do know there are those who are into this, and that is them this is me and we don't fit so we don't meet.






And Wouldn't the dom -- acting responsibly, also take into consideration his/her sub's limits- take them to the edge (pushing limits a bit), without forcing unwanted activities on his/her sub? Isn't the relinquishment of control (of course there are different levels of intent) is what this is all about?

yes this is what bdsm is about for some people, some just can't do it on a daily basis, for one reason or another, and that is what works for them. If this is what you desire than you have to look for one that is able to do it daily, and then again it is after getting to know one another not on first meeting, as you have to work on the trust.





Pardon my noticing, but it seems many subs here are seeking wish fulfillment (rather than serving) and are unwilling to take the time to invest in a deeper involvement (not necessarily romantic), which would in effect instill a level of trust/understanding so necessary for the development of such involvement. By calling ALL the shots (when, where, what, etc.), they are- in actuality, foot stomping subs, topping from the bottom.

Yes there are some out there that are like that, but guess what when I first started looking guess what kind of "Doms"/"Masters" contacted me? the ones who wanted online sex, wanted to dominate online, not teach, no getting to know me, no answering questions, nothing. Than I met my Master, and you want to know what attracted me to him? He didn't talk of sex, the bdsm side of things, nothing of that nature. He asked about me, what I like to do, what my boys where like, what I did for a living. And guess what he also shared those things with me. We learned about each other in a month what took me in other relationships at least a year to find out about the men.
So no you aren't going to find subs/slaves who just jump right onto your St.Andrews cross, or what have you, without getting to know you, unless they are really new to this without someone to guide them. And if you cared enough you wouldn't allow it either, but pry out info needed, share info about yourself and etc.
Relationships take work and with some you may have to do alot of the work first. Some are just shy about this aren't sure what you are wanting or what they really should say. and if you ask, expect answers whether they are a list of do's, don'ts or maybes. Take the lists and explore them. They may not be hard limits, but then again they may, you won't know till you ask.
Don't sit around feeling sorry for yourself use that energy to get to know one of these ladies and explore the possibilities.
Also watch how you word things too, sometimes without meaning to you can come across as overbearing, and pushy, and as for myself I would either walk away or tell you thanks but no thanks.





Any thoughts?








anyway hope this makes sense and that is how I could understand what you were saying and these were my thoughts on what you said. JUst my opinions.



(in reply to Handspankingdom)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 10:12:00 AM   
SweetDommes


Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mylee

Hiya, I'm a little confussed you said in your post you've been with us two weeks yet your date joined says 7/6/05....



The join date that shows on this side of the site is when he joined the message boards side - not when he joined the site.

To the topic, however - I totally did not see his post as a "one true way"ism ... yeah, I can see how it could be taken that way, but I don't think it's what the OP intended. As he has not reposted, I don't know if it is or not, but I choose to give him the benifit of the doubt. To me, this seems to be another example of males getting bashed for asking questions while females get a lot more sympathy ... if it had been a female OP, I doubt that she would have been accused of "one true way"ism ... but because it's a male OP, he is.

I read the post as being about people who misrepresent themselves (i.e. lie) and the frustration of dealing with those people. I saw nothing in there that said the OP thinks "if they don't do it my way, they aren't really submissives" - he was talking about a few who he has communicated with who advertise one thing and then show another thing when contacted (I believe it's called 'bait and switch'). We've run into it before - and it goes for all aspects of the lifestyle. For example - I have no problems with those who aren't into 24/7 ... but if someone isn't wanting 24/7, they shouldn't go around saying they are and then say that the lifestyle can't be anything more than a hobby (yeah, we've run into more than one who actually said that ... after claiming to be a 24/7 slave). If someone says they are a service sub, then they need to have something that shows that they are - instead of getting to know someone, meeting them face to face, and then flat out refusing to serve unless they get beaten daily (dammit, if you're a pain slut, say so ... bah). I don't care what somone is, or how they fit into the lifestyle, as long as they are honest about who/what they are - or that they aren't sure where they fit. I don't think that's too much to ask for, and I thought that's what the OP was asking for.

Yeah, I get tired of reading threads about all the fakes, players, posers, wannabes, outright liars, etc ... but you know what? It isn't going to change any time soon (and that goes for all the *see previous list* that are out there, as well as those complaning about them). Hell, I am about ready to dig up a thread about people who can't/won't read profiles because of all the messages we've been getting lately, even with our "we're taking a break from looking" profile up.

(in reply to Mylee)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 11:35:53 AM   
Youcantmakemeeee


Posts: 36
Joined: 7/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Handspankingdom

I have sent notes to a few potential submissive females, however I have been greatly disappointed with their responses (one liners seeking pictures) and ability to communicate/relay their thougts as they pertain to D's. Indeed, a few subs don't really seem to grasp the concept of submitting at all, by starting with limits and then listing their likes and dislikes/do's and don'ts. While it is helpful to share such expectations, etc., if one makes a sincere effort (time investment) to get to know someone with respect to their pursuit in a D's relationship, wouldn't the trust level achieved make the sub comfortable with her dom? Isn't this what submitting is all about? Or are many here just seeking wish fulfillment?



Although I'm submissive I have my own wishes, desires, and needs, which many of times Doms online don't want to hear, which is their right. I do not immediate start with these things because I have high standards in how one communicates with me. I will, however, express my needs and the things I simply will not tollerate in the beginning stages of communication with someone. I do this because many do not wish to have a submissive such as myself and I don't want to waste anyone's time. As for wish fulfillment, well that comes up when it comes up. I don't tend to bring that up in conversation unless directly asked about them.

You say that subs do this. Well, that is true, but the reverse is equally true. I've been contacted by many Doms who immediately start discussing sexual wishes or they may immediately start telling me their needs in such a manner as to imply the foundation of the relationship is that the submissive's sole purpose and only function is to satisfy the dominant's needs. Well, it's a mutual relationship. Both parties must have their needs met. One of the submissive's needs is to please just as one of the dominant's needs is to guide, but that doesn't encapsulate the whole relationship.

For myself, in most areas, I leave out discussing sexual acts for I feel they can be compromised on if everything else in the relationship works. There are a few exceptions I'm sure but for the most part, I find this to be true. So, if I leave out this portion of bdsm and stick to the remainder, I find that there are not many Doms left to communicate with. So again....it goes both ways. Subs and Dom/es alike will rush to talk about all their desires and wishes.

C.

_____________________________

"Then he said my name, ..., and I understood what gives cats the urge to purr."

(in reply to Handspankingdom)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 1:51:46 PM   
Nu


Posts: 2
Joined: 6/7/2005
From: the Bluebonnets in Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gemeni
Others actually have a driving need to submit to a person. These are the ones I find worthy of an investment,they actually have some depth.



Gemeni hit it straight on...i crave to submit and serve. No games here. It may be the last decision i make, but my submission is mine.

However I CHOOSE to whom i submit...don't walk up to me with whip in hand and point to your boots, boy.

I willing give myself unconditionally to a man of integrity, in whom i have confidence, in whom i have seen demonstrated that he is capable of taking care of my needs (as a submissive, as a woman and as a human being). i have looked into his eyes and seen the inherent dominant maleness that sends my inherent femaleness to her knees.

The key to the deepest and most satisfying submission isn't the thrill of anticipated punishment, but the trust in Him that allows me to crawl out from all the bullshit baggage I carry on my shoulders and do exactly what pleases Him without any need to think; especially without needing to think about the bargaining that a woman has to do in a typical vanilla relationship in order to get her needs met.

Having a wall sized whip collection, or an avatar of a woman sucking your cock does not a Dom make. The avatars/pics that make me wet and hot are the simple adorned, uncostumed facial pics where i can see His eyes. That's usually all i ever need to see, to know if he is interesting enough for me to make contact. May i humbly offer that you let some subs read your ad and give you feedback on how they perceive your message? Perhaps you have unwittingly sent the wrong message and the wrong submissives are answering your call.

As for the "Santa Syndrome", i will state my needs, wants and wishes to a potential Master, but if i give myself to him, i'm pretty much at His mercy. And part of my needs, wants and wishes is to be loved. i believe that a Dom of any integrity at all would tell me if that emotion is not part of His repertoire.



_____________________________

Nu

Teach me to let go.

(in reply to Gemeni)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? - 7/10/2005 1:57:22 PM   
slatyb


Posts: 43
Joined: 1/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Handspankingdom

Good afternoon all,

I have been a member of collarme.com for approximately two weeks...

My experience in the BDSM (primarily D's) world has encompassed 15 years...

of both on the spiritual and physical level of being a dominant. I wanted to add my thoughts and observations here as a member.

I have sent notes to a few potential submissive females, however I have been greatly disappointed with their responses (one liners seeking pictures) ...

and ability to communicate/relay their thougts as they pertain to D's. Indeed, a few subs don't really seem to grasp the concept of submitting at all, by starting with limits and then listing their likes and dislikes/do's and don'ts....

Pardon my noticing, but it seems many subs here are... topping from the bottom.

Any thoughts?


Several, but it's probably best if I keep most of them to myself. But here's one: Why not send a picture with the first message? Many people do not want to invest time corresponding with someone only to find out later that there is no physical attraction. For the same reason, you may as well get all the non-negotiables out of the way immediately. No point in wasting time corresponding with someone who is fundamentally incompatible.

Here's another: Since no one is meeting your expectations, maybe you should consider the possibility that your expectations are unrealistic?

It's a funny world. I would have thought that the people looking for "true subs" would be attractive to the people looking for "real doms", but it seems not to be the case.

< Message edited by slatyb -- 7/10/2005 2:03:25 PM >

(in reply to Handspankingdom)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Domspeak: The subs on collarme?? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109