RE: Competition in the 'community' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Bobkgin -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:23:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rover

I surmise that we can both live with that.
 


Indeed, I can, as the evidence stored away under my "View Forum Posts" button at my profile does not support any of your exaggerations, distortions, or outright fabrications.

I suppose your statements were for the benefit of those who are either ignorant of those facts, too lazy to check them, or too biased to admit them.

Which goes a long way towards identifying the nature of the individuals whom you've chosen for your audience.




stef -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:27:07 PM)

Block him, Bob.  You know you want to.

~stef




Aileen68 -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:29:31 PM)

Hey bob...trust me.  You are in a league all by yourself. 
You have no competition within your little world.




Bobkgin -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:38:41 PM)

To no one in particular:

From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":

"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."

Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?

Just curious.




IrishMist -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:42:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

To no one in particular:

From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":

"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."

Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?

Just curious.

LMAO.

Priceless, absolutly priceless.

He's losing this one fast so he runs home to the mods...

How simply...adorable [&:]




mistoferin -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:54:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

To no one in particular:

From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":

"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."

Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?

Just curious.


I think they judge it against whether or not they believe the poster being belittled seems to have a humiliation kink that is proven by his history of begging for it.




RCdc -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:57:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

To no one in particular:

From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":

"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."

Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?

Just curious.


Not sure Bob.  However, if you are insinuating that has happened to you - then you are just as guilty of the same.
If it isn't - then contact the moderators yourself and ask them.  It isn't for us to answer a question that only a moderator can respond to.
 
Peace
the.dark.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 2:57:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin
To no one in particular:
From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":
"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."

Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?

Just curious.

LMAO.  [sm=biggrin.gif]

Priceless, absolutely priceless.

He's losing this one fast so he runs home to the mods...

How simply...adorable [&:]

[sm=bust.gif]SOME-body is peeking again!!! [sm=bust.gif]
 
You know when you can't handle mature discussion and debate and see every disagreement as attack, maybe you should consider using the 'block' function.

Oh wait....

Nevermind....




MadRabbit -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 3:02:26 PM)

Dont anger the Messiah




RCdc -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 3:04:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

Dont anger the Messiah


....trying.... hard..... not .... to quote...... Python.....
 
Peace
the.dark.




came4U -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 3:09:47 PM)

quote:

To no one in particular


means to who/mever listens to you? , gives positive or one of whom you are 'able-ready to discuss/argue vs others YOU ignore?

quote:

From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":


Means um what??? simple words section, guidelines, general, bdsm, discussion.

quote:

"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."


Just because someone mentions your name as the OP does not mean a bad thing is occuring it is called as above ^^ = DISCUSSION. If you, personally feel flamed, humiliated or belittled it is perhaps because you start a topic yet cannot complete charge of such (topic). 

quote:

Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?
Just curious.


Are you accusing mods of not 'saving' you from the very words you say you create and are becoming of you?  Not much of a writer if you cannot distinguish purpose, thought and emotion into words without the audience giving shameful, bitter yet rightful criticizm for such prose.  Write away, but be prepared to back up such statements of propriety to ALL the audience that returns time and energy into thoughtful response.  Otherwise, go create a blog , a BOB-BLOG and give yourself some creative-leadership within the group that choose to follow your directorship in a conversation.

Calling mods? gimme a break, no one has directly flamed you. Old school? Anyone old school would direct you to the nearest submissive tea meeting for suggesting that ideal. Be a man and take all or several bantering thoughts or do not show up at all.  Seems as thought you have a crush on Rover as one to give you the perfect outlet for what you wanted to say to begin with. How this conversation became what you thought it would be to how you LEAD it to be is obvious.  That is why you ignore the others that see right through you.

Of course he doesn't see me, because I don't agree. sigh

Waste of air sometimes. It is no different that those that being a topic and 1. never return or 2. return to hear only the answers they want to. It only proves as many, many other threads, that your agenda wayyyyyyyyy out-weighs the response and again YOU only want to see yourself in print. (yes, and maybe some insecure submissive might see you are a God because you use big words and big paragraphs).  lame, sad and lame. 

oh man, now I just wrote a bazillion paragraphs explaining how someone else is a moronic attention-seeking manwhore. gulps. oh well, fuk ya! I don't claim I know it all, I am just stable enough to know I am not a BOB.  


PS! an OFF-statement, but why do you not consider a submissive as competition? To me, you are more submissive, non-dominant.  So who exactly is your competition?  Who are you trying to impress with this banter with 'the so called limited few' that you do not have on block?  To me, you have no status to compete with real men. Yanno, Real men who are not cowardice, mentally immature or under guise of an imaginary morality that is used with negative character charge. Men who post and not run, men who accept negative, positive, distant prospective thoughts without prejustice.  I think I will block you. I am a submissive afterall, me weak, I can't handle you.


quote:

From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":

"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."

Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?

Just curious.


and WHOM are you 'NOT' refering to??? since you have most of us on block and cannot see any negative postings? 





domiguy -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 3:38:28 PM)

This is not an exhibition...It is a competition....There are no restrictor plates allowed... It's balls to the walls out here folks....Nothing irritates me more than when I see some Dom sniffin' up my bitches tree....I play dirty...I send messages to subs like ..." Did you hear that Rover was arrested!!...Or...I read that Bob got caught stealing panties from Kmart...Or.... Michael orders blow up dolls...Or...Ya know that guy, Ron?...I  think he's on the D.L."  This shit is not for the faint hearted....You gotta bring your "A game" out here...Boi!

At one time I was a kinder gentler Domiguy...But when Bob left so did my Sun....Piss on ya all...The last Dom standing takes the cheese!  Good luck...You fucking pervs!  Domiguy storms out of the thread and kicks ExSteelAgain right in the nuts just for the Hell of it.




ExSteelAgain -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:11:20 PM)

I suddenly felt sick to my stomach and decided to check here for some reason. Now I know why...heh. A damn kick to the balls. I can see me beside Domni and a good looking woman walks up. He doesn't hesitate, just kicks me in the balls and says hi to her.




Bobkgin -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:18:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

I suddenly felt sick to my stomach and decided to check here for some reason. Now I know why...heh. A damn kick to the balls. I can see me beside Domni and a good looking woman walks up. He doesn't hesitate, just kicks me in the balls and says hi to her.


Not everyone is impressed with that approach, Steel.




gypsygrl -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:18:42 PM)

I'm not a dom, and I don't exhibit alot of domly attributes (and thank god for that!).  But, I did start a thread about 'writing' once.  Actually it was a thread about posting.  I put it in health and safety.  I had noticed that when I was pms my posting increased and I wanted to know if others had noticed the correlation.

Pms isn't the only reason I go on manic posting binges.  Sometimes its because I've had too much coffee.  Other times its because I've spent too much time by myself and am feeling a little nutty and need to break it up a bit.

But, its never to compete.  Nor to beckon.

But, ya know.  Thats just me.




ExSteelAgain -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:21:45 PM)

Bob, so you would interpret a kick in the balls as criticism? You think he might be dissing me?




MadRabbit -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:23:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

Bob, so you would interpret a kick in the balls as criticism? You think he might be dissing me?


I think his balls are just a little sore and on the senstive side...

Any reference...and he jumps




Redoubt -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:24:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

Dont anger the Messiah


....trying.... hard..... not .... to quote...... Python.....
 
Peace
the.dark.

 
I don't have your willpower
 
"He's NOT the messiah... he's a verrrry naughty boy!"




came4U -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:26:40 PM)

gypsy, dear gypsy,

I am not pms'ing, I am nice for 3 days per month a bi*tch for 27. [:)]

lol

Doms that have PMS, yes, it is called pre-man syndrome.  Some men need less time dwelling on pity and more time on self (non forum) improvement.




Bobkgin -> RE: Competition in the 'community' (8/30/2007 4:28:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

Bob, so you would interpret a kick in the balls as criticism? You think he might be dissing me?


I would not try to figure out what he had in mind, Steel.

But in my travels I've met more than a few women who prefer a more cerebral approach over the troglodyte method.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875