BeingChewsie
Posts: 1633
Joined: 10/27/2005 Status: offline
|
I'd define it as consistently being who he is, not doing things out of character, It is the same kind of trust that I have in the sun rising and setting each day, I don't even think about it not doing so or him not being the person I have come to know. I believe in the above absolutely and decisions he makes will be in line with his character. I know he will make the best decisions he can make in that moment(considering long term goals/desires) for everybody involved, sometimes that leans more in his favor, sometimes mine, sometimes the kiddos, sometimes it sucks for all 3 of us or is great for all of us. Our life is pretty consistent but not static so I can't say every decision has been an in the moment best decision for me or R or the kiddo. He does the best he can with the information in front of him, sometimes he gets it wrong. He is the first to apologize and the first to do what he has to do to make things right. I don't know any other way to explain it, I trust him to absolutely be the man he presented as, that I have come to know over the past 8 years, and I trust that the decisions he makes will be in line with his character day after day. quote:
ORIGINAL: Twicehappy2x As a submissive or a slave define trust in your relationship with you dominant. Is it an absolute for you that you trust your dominant to make the best choice for you even if it may not be the best choice for them or fulfill their wants? As a dominant do you always make the best choices/decisions for your submissive even if it is not what you would desire or is best for you? Do you think a submissive is not a good submissive if they expect you to always choose what is best for them rather than what you as a dominant want from them? After reading a lot of the responses on a few threads going around this question has been rolling around in my head. I know my own response, in order to offer my submission I have to be able to trust them to ALWAYS make the best decision for me. Not the one they prefer or that would best suit their interests but the best one for me. I’ll give you some differing examples. On a recent thread about hiring your slave out Daddysprop said that she had been hired or loaned out and that on occasion she had suffered some damage. (Daddysprop, please do not be offended or think I am saying your way is wrong, I admire your level of devotion). Personally if it happened once I might be inclined to let it go as a freak occurrence but the next time I would lose all trust and there would no longer be any submission there. At that point I would be telling the dominant, you are not making the best choices for me but rather for you. A while back KOM stated his girls number one rule, even before obey is protect my property. Mistoferin and LA both spoke very lovingly of dominants in their lives that let them go and continue their growth because it was the best decision for them as individuals not the one the dominant would have preferred for themselves.
< Message edited by BeingChewsie -- 8/31/2007 6:07:58 AM >
_____________________________
"In fact, it is my contention that most women are accepting of way less than optimal circumstance constantly, and are lucky to be 'snagged' by the right man, if ever. But it is more by happy accident than by their design. " ~Ron and Hup
|