RE: "Love Reign O'er Me"

RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:12:59 AM)
Again people are lumped in as some sort of 'pussy possey' that is out to get the OP. I open and reply to only what is interesting or worthy of discussion. Not sure about other folk around here, but I do not know them or even email them. They may or may not, not anyone's business. Maybe after a long while being here/anywhere, they are only aquaintences because of 'familiarity'. I don't see them bragging that they talk about you (don't you wish) in mail or another im program. Again, grow up. The very OP that rambles endlessly about competition, people dying around him, how sad lil nymphs should crawl to his side for his brilliance. Sad,sad and I frankly tire of it. Some people just like to argue and know full well that what they say will cause a debate and they have their chosen few that they will respond to (because they only have the answers to those (that is called being narrow-minded and arrogantly opnionated). It makes me miss Bill and his funny, yet somehow legitimate questions. Bob, on the other hand is the Prince (self-appointed) of Liberty. Bring me your lame, your emotionally disabled, your insecure..' yeah, my f*kin hero. A real man, IMO, can handle a stronger kind of gal, yanno, not one who is at her last wits or so broken you seemed like a better choice than something like ummm 'homelessness'.

LaTigresse -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:14:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy Wow! RRafe has now blocked Bob!....A masterful strike! Why would Bob go and block himself? It's deep man! Really fucking deep! (Domiguy looks in the dumpster and sees a discarded ham sandwich...Offers LaT the first bite) LaT..We think a like, we fish..We both dig pussy....I smell a CM romance emerging. Consider yourself..."Under Consideration!" Does it have mustard? On your knees bitch!

Bobkgin -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:14:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RRafe Question being,if one is honest enough to see it in themselves-do you have the strength to break the cycle of self abuse? I'm done now-I think I got bored. The idea that if you ignore them they will go away is a myth. The fact is, the more you ignore them the more frenzied they become, because they are obsessed with you acknowledging their (allegedly superior) existence. You'll find putting them on block will help to clear up the clutter in a thread.

velvetears -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:15:46 AM)
This thread, for me anyway, went a very predictable way. i remember a few months back creating a thread and spoke about a "clique" that went around, complaining about drama and not liking it, and posed the question, "why then make yourslef a part of it, if your real intentions were to want it to go away." The clique didn't like it very much and i was kind back then in calling them a clique and not bullies. Funny how that same group pops up here too.... hmmmmm. If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. i am sure there will be a bucket of shit thrown my way - but.... i don't give a shit. Sling away. The day i don't speak my mind is the day i am in my grave.

KatyLied -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:16:23 AM)
quote: The very OP that rambles endlessly about competition, people dying around him, how sad lil nymphs should crawl to his side for his brilliance. You forgot to mention bullies and thread jacks, those are also some of his favorite things, erm topics.

LaTigresse -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:19:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: velvetears This thread, for me anyway, went a very predictable way. i remember a few months back creating a thread and spoke about a "clique" that went around, complaining about drama and not liking it, and posed the question, "why then make yourslef a part of it, if your real intentions were to want it to go away." The clique didn't like it very much and i was kind back then in calling them a clique and not bullies. Funny how that same group pops up here too.... hmmmmm. If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. i am sure there will be a bucket of shit thrown my way - but.... i don't give a shit. Sling away. The day i don't speak my mind is the day i am in my grave. I have come to the conclusion that you enjoy toilet play and were just feeling left out. Hense, this post?

Bobkgin -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:19:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: earthycouple quote: ORIGINAL: Bobkgin quote: ORIGINAL: RRafe quote: ORIGINAL: Bobkgin quote: ORIGINAL: RRafe You guys might also consider just leaving a topic alone if it offends you so much. What you are witnessing is the "whatever Bob says must be wrong" syndrome. Get used to it, amongst the obsessed it is their favourite pastime. I know. It's always fun to feel better about yourself by tearing others down. Very mature. I've seen this on every board I've participated on. It is inevitable those prone to obsessive-compulsive behaviour will pick me as a target. <shrug> If everyone is "picking you as a target" on "every board" it would seem that the problem lies within YOU, not the masses. Are you sure you want to admit to the public that you see "everyone" and "those prone to obsessive-compulsive behaviour" as synonymous?

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:21:07 AM)
velvet, I agree and have considered what you say, but I treat this guy's threads as I would someone in Health discussion who would tell someone with a bleeding would to pour vinegar in it. His advice and ideals are bombarded with useless jargon to make himself a 'big man', yet without capability to confront or backup his theories, what good are they really? They are merely mish-mash opinions that these forums are for sharing-opinions.

velvetears -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:21:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse quote: ORIGINAL: velvetears This thread, for me anyway, went a very predictable way. i remember a few months back creating a thread and spoke about a "clique" that went around, complaining about drama and not liking it, and posed the question, "why then make yourslef a part of it, if your real intentions were to want it to go away." The clique didn't like it very much and i was kind back then in calling them a clique and not bullies. Funny how that same group pops up here too.... hmmmmm. If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. i am sure there will be a bucket of shit thrown my way - but.... i don't give a shit. Sling away. The day i don't speak my mind is the day i am in my grave. I have come to the conclusion that you enjoy toilet play and were just feeling left out. Hense, this post? i won my own bet - you'd be the first to post - you are so predictable, oh lady stick poker of all windbags LOL

Bobkgin -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:26:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: velvetears This thread, for me anyway, went a very predictable way. i remember a few months back creating a thread and spoke about a "clique" that went around, complaining about drama and not liking it, and posed the question, "why then make yourslef a part of it, if your real intentions were to want it to go away." The clique didn't like it very much and i was kind back then in calling them a clique and not bullies. Funny how that same group pops up here too.... hmmmmm. If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. i am sure there will be a bucket of shit thrown my way - but.... i don't give a shit. Sling away. The day i don't speak my mind is the day i am in my grave. Velvet, while I'm willing to illuminate the subject of cyber-bullies as it applies to bdsm forums, I'm not here to fence with them, nor do I encourage anyone else to do so. I'm here to talk about what interests me. I'd much rather hear you talk about the OP, if you please.

KnightofMists -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:27:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: velvetears This thread, for me anyway, went a very predictable way. i remember a few months back creating a thread and spoke about a "clique" that went around, complaining about drama and not liking it, and posed the question, "why then make yourslef a part of it, if your real intentions were to want it to go away." The clique didn't like it very much and i was kind back then in calling them a clique and not bullies. Funny how that same group pops up here too.... hmmmmm. If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. i am sure there will be a bucket of shit thrown my way - but.... i don't give a shit. Sling away. The day i don't speak my mind is the day i am in my grave. your just jealous cause you not in the clique... and yes... before you post it... I am predicting you are going to say.. "I don't want to be part of a clique.. not this clique anyways"... predicting is much more creditible if you put it out there before the event instead of after the event.

velvetears -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:28:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: came4U velvet, I agree and have considered what you say, but I treat this guy's threads as I would someone in Health discussion who would tell someone with a bleeding would to pour vinegar in it. His advice and ideals are bombarded with useless jargon to make himself a 'big man', yet without capability to confront or backup his theories, what good are they really? They are merely mish-mash opinions that these forums are for sharing-opinions. But they are his opinions and he is entitled to them - are you saying they are dangerous? Heck a lot of what i see being espoused around here i find whacky but i am an adult as everyone else her is too (or should be anyway) so people can decide for themselves what is valuable and what's not. i personally don't see bob shoving his opinions down anyones throat and he's not been rude to anyone by personally denigrating them, ridiculing them or insulting them. He's new so the pack has fresh meat. But i will say his sharp claws have done damage and it is fun to see the pack getting some wounds [:D]

happypervert -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:32:35 AM)
quote: Bob, on the other hand is the Prince (self-appointed) of Liberty. Bring me your lame, your emotionally disabled, your insecure..' . . . and I'll block them if they aren't positively giddy with delight to have the opportunity to read all the brilliant things I think I have to say!

earthycouple -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:34:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: velvetears This thread, for me anyway, went a very predictable way. i remember a few months back creating a thread and spoke about a "clique" that went around, complaining about drama and not liking it, and posed the question, "why then make yourslef a part of it, if your real intentions were to want it to go away." The clique didn't like it very much and i was kind back then in calling them a clique and not bullies. Funny how that same group pops up here too.... hmmmmm. If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. i am sure there will be a bucket of shit thrown my way - but.... i don't give a shit. Sling away. *The day i don't speak my mind is the day i am in my grave.* and that goes for most of us...hence our posts. Such double standards...it's ok for you to speak your mind, but we should not read and reply (thus speaking our minds) interesting.

Stephann -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:36:24 AM)
Pack? Clique? Wounds? The only cliquing I do is on a UK keyboard... Stephan

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:39:14 AM)
quote: i personally don't see bob shoving his opinions down anyones throat and he's not been rude to anyone by personally denigrating them, ridiculing them or insulting them. you do jest??? oh my. Dangerous? who knows. Only to me, I don't know about other people. Finding weak, insecure, women (IMO), is not what BDSM is about. Anyone can impress the weak and insecure just as anyone with a soapbox can seem taller. I don't know you, or others here, but to mock someone for posting first after a comment? ridiculous. I can usually handle if any backlash of what I type without getting personal about it. If not, that makes me as infantile as my neighbor's 3 yr old and I wouldn't even qualify as having ability to post to begin with. If such 'pack' has recieved wounds? then that implies Bob has subtly or not so subtly attacked hasn't he? His rudeness, arrogance and blind insight in regards to 'perfection' as being called upon as a necessary in any regard except physics is um retarded. That is my opinion, and until the day when BOB can afford my net, phone and cable service to censor me (or anyone else for that matter) will be the day I stop. I have the right to reply to a good posting negatively, or a bad posting positively. Why? because this place is free, I OWN my keyboard and I am neither weak nor insecure. What next? Bob gets a fan club and his own clique? In that case, I still do not fear confronting any issue that I believe in personally. My only 'clique' is the cocking-meachanism on my revolver.

Bobkgin -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:47:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Stephann Pack? Clique? Wounds? The only cliquing I do is on a UK keyboard... Stephan Stephan, each gang of bullies has its cloud of wannabes circling about, hoping to be more popular in that way. These are people whose maturation stopped somewhere between public school and high school. They're stunted, emotionally. They fear risking themselves with committment. They never quite commit 100%. And anyone who does scares the hell out of them, not to mention raises the standards for what is desirable. Why want someone who won't commit over someone who has demonstrated the ability to commit under the most difficult of circumstances? Why want someone who insists you're selfish over someone who loves you because you are more selfless than he? Why serve someone who makes you feel like they are doing you a favour, over someone who will respect what it takes to give your freedom away? Any wonder they're squealing?

Aileen68 -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:48:04 AM)
I am no longer feeling the love in this thread.

angelic -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 8:49:48 AM)
Knight, i understand where Velvet is coming from. There are so many times where someone will post a thread and i can sit on this side of my screen and predict who will respond and how. i have learned to identify, just from reading these forums on a daily basis, a train wreck of a thread upon reading the OP. And probably a good 75% of the time many of the same ones here, do the exact same thing everywhere else. Sometimes these folks will have something real and intelligent to add to a discussion, but mostly they just make fun of others without adding anything. ~grins~ now before you get the idea that i am just jealous and want to be part of 'that' clique, i do not. i am not a person that likes to join a thread or make snarky comments just to be part of a clique.

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:01:31 AM)
angelic, scary thing is, I began by posting my legitimate, on topic, ideals on many of his subjects. Yet, as I have said what 5x now...he only responds to that/those in which he can handle responding to. Those that perhaps in his mind, play into his anticipated ideal-banter philosophy to attempt to prove his manlihood. So, now that he can't see me, who cares. It is like talking to the air hehe, I have had 4 children, I have done that often. Brick wall discussions are my fave. [:D] As far as pity goes. I cannot fathom a grown man wanting it. Nor would I be impressed or challenged by a man who states in profile he wants someone to 'fill the shoes of his previous slave' uhhg. quote: I am here to replace the slave I lost to cancer last year. If one is healed, they will move on, discontinue using such tactics to lure a gal into a false sense of security of 'I won't hurt a fly' mentality. If you are weak, I will hold your hand. yuk. quote: Why want someone who won't commit over someone who has demonstrated the ability to commit under the most difficult of circumstances? Somehow I knew that eventually he would use a conversation with one he pretends to actually see as justification for acting/behaving in this manner, to clarify and happen to mention that women will flock to man who seems more faithful than the average joe (as if average joe has to tell a gal every 5 minutes that he would be good death-bed potential (vs, a legitimate caregiver of the living and non illness striken). For the eleventy-thousandth time (yes, 3x each thread) he says his wife died, bla bla bla. How can the sad, in mourning possibly cope with having such perfection in a new submissive if he still drags the love of another around. Seems aweful 'insecure' to me, and only a psychologist can fix that, not a new girl. Then whom is healing whom? The misses is dead and long gone, time to stop living on her coffin coat-tails and move on to becoming a 'whole and secure' man. Who in their right mind wants to play the submissive part of a ghostly misses McBob anyays? I say, if he only sees the forest line as moving up on him, it is because his castle is made of cardboard and paper machet.

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125