RE: "Love Reign O'er Me"

RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

LATEXBABY64 -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:05:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: angelic Knight, i understand where Velvet is coming from. There are so many times where someone will post a thread and i can sit on this side of my screen and predict who will respond and how. i have learned to identify, just from reading these forums on a daily basis, a train wreck of a thread upon reading the OP. And probably a good 75% of the time many of the same ones here, do the exact same thing everywhere else. Sometimes these folks will have something real and intelligent to add to a discussion, but mostly they just make fun of others without adding anything. ~grins~ now before you get the idea that i am just jealous and want to be part of 'that' clique, i do not. i am not a person that likes to join a thread or make snarky comments just to be part of a clique. lol it is kinda of like a video game like a rpg lol rpg = role playing game battle post just when you thought it was safe to type rofl... OK any how it is a freaking computer with an off button.... there are more things in life to get stressed about then.. what someone types on a site thousands of miles away it is freaking ridiculous to get up set... it is kinda of like the people who sit infront of tne tv yelling at a news boradcast oh well

KatyLied -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:06:11 AM)
quote: I am no longer feeling the love in this thread. But are you squealing? That is the question!

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:08:48 AM)
Katy, I want someone to feel the love while being tried to a tree, squeeling 'REEEeeee ReeeeEEEe piggy' no names mentioned. [:)]

angelic -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:09:36 AM)
came4u, it might surprise you that i agree with you. i found Bob to be highly ridiculous when he first started posting and decided he simply was not worth my bandwidth. The difference between the two of us (i have 2 teenaged demon male ums) (who i would give my life for) and i spend a great deal of my day talking to two brick walls. i do not want to log on and do what i have already spent a good deal of my day doing (i.e. talking to a brick wall). i really was not referring to the OP, because that would be an exercise in futility. i was simply commenting on Knight's comments to Velvet. [;)]

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:18:45 AM)
anyone ever see the movie 'What about Bob'? with Bill Murray and Richard Dryfess. lol love how he travels carrying a goldfish around, babysteps, babysteps. Yes, even THAT Bob healed eventually and put down the fish! step away from the fish Bob!

Stephann -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:25:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Bobkgin Stephan, each gang of bullies has its cloud of wannabes circling about, hoping to be more popular in that way. These are people whose maturation stopped somewhere between public school and high school. They're stunted, emotionally. They fear risking themselves with committment. They never quite commit 100%. And anyone who does scares the hell out of them, not to mention raises the standards for what is desirable. Why want someone who won't commit over someone who has demonstrated the ability to commit under the most difficult of circumstances? Why want someone who insists you're selfish over someone who loves you because you are more selfless than he? Why serve someone who makes you feel like they are doing you a favour, over someone who will respect what it takes to give your freedom away? Any wonder they're squealing? I don't want someone to love me because they're selfless. It would imply I'm not worthy of their love, in the first place. I'm content to be loved, by people, for who I am; not in spite of myself. Just because people don't agree with you, doesn't mean they're stunted, weak, immature, or afraid. Why ask Why? Try Bud Dry. Stephan

LATEXBABY64 -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:32:57 AM)
you know i am going to say this with out people like bob and everyone else this message board would suck it would be all one sided thinking and everyone would agree and we would all be bored so keep posting bob and everyone. cause with you we just would be another day of bs in the ds.. just how it is live it learn it know it

Bobkgin -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:34:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Stephann I don't want someone to love me because they're selfless. It would imply I'm not worthy of their love, in the first place. No one has ever loved me for those reasons, Stephan. They loved me because they believed me worthy of their love. For me, it was all the more reason to do my best as their master to be worthy of their love and faith in me. My wife did not find me lacking, which gives me peace. *quote:* I'm content to be loved, by people, for who I am; not in spite of myself. On this at least we agree quote: Just because people don't agree with you, doesn't mean they're stunted, weak, immature, or afraid. Nor have I said that nor do I believe it. That's coming from the bullies, who have been blocked for their immature behaviour. I've known many people who knew more than I, who corrected me and from whom I've learned. There is a difference between those who disagree with what I know, and those who disagree with my right to exist. I learn from the former, and ignore the latter.

Mercnbeth -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:36:47 AM)
quote: If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. Wrong - plain & fancy. Bob's not an annoyance - he is dangerous. He's a fraud. He represents a problem with no solution - internet information which can be used by some naive reader as fact. He knows himself to be a fraud or else he wouldn't be so uncomfortable and would address challenge with debate - not blocking. Want a prediction? Once all credibility is gone he announce he has "found" his twin submissive/slaves, (aka his left and right hand) and disappear perhaps to be reincarnated under a different profile name. I couldn't care less about him as a person, I'm here for pure entertainment value. Consider however a lot more people read CM than post to it. A lot more can be sold and buy a bullshit bill of goods seeking some one handed web surfing messiah. People looking for integrity and commitment should be pointed to examples of breaching those ideals from frauds espousing personal virtue. From the correspondence and contact we have on the other side of this site and in person, its appreciated. If its not to you - take your own advice; " If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really."; replacing 'anti-Bob' with 'Bob'.

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:37:28 AM)
quote: Why want someone who insists you're selfish over someone who loves you because you are more selfless than he? Why serve someone who makes you feel like they are doing you a favour, over someone who will respect what it takes to give your freedom away? I don't know how you think you are selfless if you, yourself are in need of someone to ease you of pain via making you feel necessary. Volunteer at a food bank, no actual contact with the general poor public necessary (thank God) in sorting cans and no need to compare sad stories with the hungry or starving either, I am sure they would tire of hearing it just as quickly as I have.

Cyntilating -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:46:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen68 I am no longer feeling the love in this thread. no kidding

velvetears -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 9:57:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote: If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really. If he's delusional, stubborn, narrowminded, stupid, etc..... why on heavens earth would you even click on his threads? Yanno why - you enjoy it, plain and simple. Wrong - plain & fancy. Bob's not an annoyance - he is dangerous. He's a fraud. He represents a problem with no solution - internet information which can be used by some naive reader as fact. He knows himself to be a fraud or else he wouldn't be so uncomfortable and would address challenge with debate - not blocking. Want a prediction? Once all credibility is gone he announce he has "found" his twin submissive/slaves, (aka his left and right hand) and disappear perhaps to be reincarnated under a different profile name. I couldn't care less about him as a person, I'm here for pure entertainment value. Consider however a lot more people read CM than post to it. A lot more can be sold and buy a bullshit bill of goods seeking some one handed web surfing messiah. People looking for integrity and commitment should be pointed to examples of breaching those ideals from frauds espousing personal virtue. From the correspondence and contact we have on the other side of this site and in person, its appreciated. If its not to you - take your own advice; " If Bob annoys you so much - don't read his threads... simple really."; replacing 'anti-Bob' with 'Bob'. And i am sure you are getting the entertainment you so value from this thread, enjoy. As for making the assumptions you did regarding Bob (he's dangerous, a fraud, a "problem" with no solution) those are your opinions. i am a big girl and don't need anyone saving me from the evils of bob. i believe other readers would want the same courtesy of thinking and making decisions for themselves. If what you are saying has any merit - email the mods and let them handle it.

Bobkgin -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:04:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: velvetears quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth He knows himself to be a fraud or else he wouldn't be so uncomfortable and would address challenge with debate - not blocking. I'm here for pure entertainment value. "The objectives of bullies are Power, Control, Domination, Subjugation. They get a kick out of seeing you react. It doesn't matter how you react, the fact they've successful provoked a reaction is, to the bully, a sign that their attempt at control have been successful. After that, it's a question of wearing you down. The more your try to explain, negotiate, conciliate, etc the more gratification they obtain from your increasingly desperate attempts to communicate with them. Understand that it is not possible to communicate in a mature adult manner with a disordered individual who's emotionally retarded." http://www.bullyonline.org/related/cyber.htm 'nuff said.

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:06:02 AM)
I find any man who is himself emotionally weak yet claims to be a Dominant - dangerous. If any gal chooses to find that attractive, I wish them luck. Some just don't enjoy living a 'blind leading the blind' life. A dom in search of his Eliza Doolittle best be smarter than the pencil he holds. Otherwise it/he is merely just another prick that writes.

velvetears -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:19:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: came4U I find any man who is himself emotionally weak yet claims to be a Dominant - dangerous. If any gal chooses to find that attractive, I wish them luck. Some just don't enjoy living a 'blind leading the blind' life. A dom in search of his Eliza Doolittle best be smarter than the pencil he holds. Otherwise it/he is merely just another prick that writes. Then i pose there are a lot of "dangerous" dominants out there and you best watch out. i don't happen to agree with you though - so i have less to worry about. Everyone has vulnerabilities and moments where they are emotionally "weak" as you put it - doms and subs. Does this make them unworthy of love or compassion, should they hide under a rock utill they become "emotionally strong"? Two people who are "emotionally weak" (whatever that means to you) don't deserve to find each other and be happy? Does talking about ones deceased wife automatically make one emotionally weak?? It seems to be a sticking point for many that he mentions it in several posts, i guess this makes him weak in your eyes, that doesn't in mine. There is a lot i find dangerous - emotionally weak people aren't one of them.

mnottertail -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:24:49 AM)
I cry at parts of The Elephant Man, I have doubts, I have times in which I am not confident, time in which I brood................... Emotions are not always weak, it is the giving into them, and wallowing in abject fear, paralysis and dolorum that is the weakness, the fact that they might spring from a single emotion is noteworthy but not tautology. MasterWeaklingBooHooHoo

celticlord2112 -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:26:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Bobkgin "The objectives of bullies are Power, Control, Domination, Subjugation. They get a kick out of seeing you react. It doesn't matter how you react, the fact they've successful provoked a reaction is, to the bully, a sign that their attempt at control have been successful. After that, it's a question of wearing you down. The more your try to explain, negotiate, conciliate, etc the more gratification they obtain from your increasingly desperate attempts to communicate with them. Understand that it is not possible to communicate in a mature adult manner with a disordered individual who's emotionally retarded." http://www.bullyonline.org/related/cyber.htm 'nuff said. Diagnostic criteria for 301.81 Narcissistic Personality Disorder http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/narcissisticpd.htm 'nuff said.

KatyLied -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:27:19 AM)
Any time someone mentions that they have problems at every board they post on, it makes me think they are pointing their finger in the wrong direction and should look in the mirror for the solution to their difficulty in communication.

mnottertail -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:29:09 AM)
I am going to study both these links, in hopes of increasing my already admirable incidence of receiving blowjobs, might be something useful. Ron

came4U -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/1/2007 10:29:16 AM)
Isn't the whole idea of being a Dominant that they should be and are the more dominant of presentable, stable and stronger (emotionally and/or physically) of such D/s dynamic? and Yes, I find it dangerous using a pitiful tearful tactics as guise for a possible wolf in lamb's clothing. It is similar to the creepy guy who uses a limp to get a gal to help him carry groceries and then pushes it into the back of his van. THAT is MY OPINION. I find it creepy. If you disagree, do so, but you would never change my mind on the topic. I prefer a man who has his shit-together and just one who pretends to.

Page: << < prev 5 6 [7] 8 9 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125