RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 12:29:18 PM)


quote:

Marc is only in favor of socialism that directly helps him with other peoples money...he is a little stingy and misguided but not a bad fellow all in all. If you put him on a deserted island he would not have any dictators or communist to bitch about while he was starving.


Sigh.

Cue the music.

"I’m just a soul who’s intentions are good... oh Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood."

– The Animals




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 12:37:32 PM)

quote:

..is that because it operates badly or because it exists at all. Surely the latter is incredibly short-sighted. Education is the beginning of freedom not the end to it. Educating our (societies) children is arguably one its greatest obligations.


Both actually, but primarily that it exists at all because it’s existence is unconstitutional. I hate having to repeat myself but here goes: The Constitution makes it clear that the Federal Government only has those powers that the Constitution specifically grants it. If the Constitution does not list the Federal Government as having a certain power then the Federal Government does not have that power nor may it assume such power unto itself. The Constitution does not even mention education therefore the Federal Government has no say in the matter. It is at most a matter for the State Governments. I have no problem with educating our children (as to what they should be taught, well that’s another whole can of worms), I just want it to be done Constitutionally.




mnottertail -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 12:40:16 PM)

What does the federal government have in its perview, by constitution?

Curiously,
Ron 




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:08:09 PM)

quote:

I hope you don't mind me using your arguments against you.

Not at all, not at all. Maybe you can succeed where so many others have failed. [;)]

quote:

I think the Department of Education is a convenient scapegoat to blame when 'Little Billy' doesn't do well in school. The truth is more along the lines of garbage in, garbage out ... which is something the government really has very little control over.

You won’t get any argument from me there. I am not using them as a scapegoat (although they are responsible for much of the garbage in), just pointing out the fact that the U. S. Department of Education shouldn’t exist in the first place.

quote:

What other government programs are poorly run, as compared to those in the private sector?

Most, I would say. What Federal entitlement program is rife with waste and fraud? At least in the private sector you have a choice whether or not to participate. The government doesn’t give you a choice (what if I don’t want to participate in Social Security?) or at most one choice, "us or nothing."

In the private sector the inefficient will lose out to the more efficient because they will lose customers. Government programs don’t have that worry. They can go right on being inefficient no matter how much they fuck up.

quote:

Also ... what programs managed by the private sector, are paragons of efficiency, such that they would give us warm and fuzzy feelings about turning the entire mess in that direction? Simply put ... since you are against government control because of the massive abuse you see in that area, aren't I equally allowed to be against private control, for the same reason?

Well the food distribution system seems to be working quite well. Every supermarket or convenience store I’ve ever been in is packed with food. But if a supermarket isn’t up to your standards, you don’t have to patronize it, you have other choices.

quote:

Make your case ... what private sector programs managed on the same scale, would you use to sway me towards your position? Oil companies? Drug companies? How about the non-regulated airline industry? How about the civilian segments of the military industrial complex?

Well, there’s always gas at the gas station when I go there. Ditto on my blood pressure meds when I go to the pharmacy.

quote:

I'm willing to listen, but first you have to get past the point that we have private control of the healthcare industry now, and it's a fucking disaster. We spend a fortune to get average, and non-universal care.

Actually, we don’t have private control of the health care industry. The government has created so many regulations and skewered the market prices with Medicare and Medicaid and that is the primary reason why it is a fucking disaster. Which would you rather have, several companies competing with each other to please you via the quality of their care and their prices because failure to please the customers means they might lose their jobs – or – a single massive bureaucracy whose workers don’t have to worry about pleasing you to keep their jobs.

quote:

Please tell me why I should throw out a chance to try something new, in favor of a system that is clearly not working?

Because government managed healthcare is not new, it has been tried in many other places and it has consistently turned out to be a failure. People denied care they need because some bureaucrat decides they don’t really need it or are too old to waste resources on. People put on long waiting lists for surgeries they need now. I live near the Canadian border and it is not at all uncommon to see several Canadian licence plates in our doctor’s parking lots.




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:14:43 PM)

quote:

I agree and the Dept of Energy and 80% of the State Dept should be gutted too.


And that's just the begining.  Somebody give me an axe please...  Social security?  Whack!  Medicaide and Medicare?  Whack!  EEOC?  Whack!  NLRB?  Whack!  Minimum wage laws?  Whack!  What else... what else...


I love whacking!

I'd whack all day if I could.




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:27:17 PM)

quote:

What does the federal government have in its perview, by constitution?


Read the Constitution, It's all there (and if it isn't there, then they don't have it).

I also suggest reading the Federalist Papers.




luckydog1 -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:27:53 PM)

I generally agree with you Marc, but I have to point out the food distribution system is full of gov interference and support.  I am more inclined towards carefull cutting with a very sharp knife than whacking with an axe.




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:35:01 PM)

quote:

I generally agree with you Marc, but I have to point out the food distribution system is full of gov interference and support.  I am more inclined towards carefull cutting with a very sharp knife than whacking with an axe.


There is little today that is not free of government interference but generally speaking, the less government interference, the better.  Imagine if food production and distribution were run on a purely socialist model.  I really would have the whack Thompson upside the head so I could eat him.




luckydog1 -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:42:53 PM)

Under a Socialist model you would have to get someone like Thompson to sign your voucher application to get your ration cards each month.  Wouldn't that be nice.




mnottertail -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:49:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

What does the federal government have in its perview, by constitution?


Read the Constitution, It's all there (and if it isn't there, then they don't have it).

I also suggest reading the Federalist Papers.



The federalist papers are of no consequence.

I thought I was right, my very first post in this thread stands as correct. your amendment 10 is fine, but the articles have stated that such things as universal health care are well within the milieu of the Federal Government.

In fact, the article in question by its wording, there is nothing (pretty much) that is not in the purview of the Federal Government.

Ron




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 1:59:15 PM)

quote:

The federalist papers are of no consequence.

The Federalist Papers are the men who wrote the Constitution, commenting on the Constitution. In our understanding of the Constitution and why it says what it does, I’d say that they are of immense consequence.

quote:

I thought I was right, my very first post in this thread stands as correct. your amendment 10 is fine, but the articles have stated that such things as universal health care are well within the milieu of the Federal Government.

In fact, the article in question by its wording, nothing that is not in the purview of the Federal Government.

Then we have no rights and no freedoms. We have rule of men and not of law.




mnottertail -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 2:02:25 PM)

you are now correct in your statement.
R  

Hopefully, I got to this before you read it, I have slightly changed my post that you replied to, but hope you feel that I have not mislead you in what I said, it wouldn't seem so at any rate.




philosophy -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 3:28:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

I have no problem with educating our children (as to what they should be taught, well that’s another whole can of worms), I just want it to be done Constitutionally.


...why?

...that is, why are the words of long dead men so integral to all social debate in the US? Were they supermen, holding powers of mind far in excess of what is known now? 
Why, when discussing US social policy, is it so damn important to go ask the constitution? Can no-one have an idea not covered in its august paragraphs?
What was the literacy rate when it was written? Could these people have foreseen a time when education is the major key to economic success, and thus social stability? If they had, wouldn't they have mentioned it? If they hadn't then why are their words relevant to the specific debate? 




chellekitty -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 3:38:23 PM)

*holds her gruel bowl up* please, Sir, i want some more"




philosophy -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 3:41:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chellekitty

*holds her gruel bowl up* please, Sir, i want some more"


..........are you sure this is the best time to quote 'Oliver Twist'? [:D]




chellekitty -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 3:49:25 PM)

why not?




philosophy -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 3:52:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chellekitty

why not?


...because, when discussing a universal health care system or education policy surely quoting 'Evita' is more appropriate......[:D]




chellekitty -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 4:01:21 PM)

i've never seen Evita, and i think begging for a bit more gruel is very appropriate when discussing a universal health care system or education policy...the movie in general is much more capitalistic...the rich stay rich, the poor stay poor, the only way to get what you want is to take what you want, you know...but in that scene...they are in a work house where they are lucky to be, and every one is equal, and everyone gets an equal amount of gruel (except behind closed doors where the fat cats secrectly eat their big ole tummies full)...and maybe someone broke a bone and needs a little more gruel to help the healing process a long...but...how dare you ask for more gruel, like you are someone special...so...you see my point?




philosophy -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 4:06:58 PM)

Dickens was a social reformer in a time when being poor was seen as being wholly the poor persons problem. He advocated personal charity as opposed to any state action, but was unsure if that would work. Hence the ambivilance in his work and his anxiety over what direction his society was moving towards.........






ShadowMster -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 4:09:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: InnocentYoungSub

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

If someone has a right to healthcare, doesn't it follow that someone has an obligation to provide that healthcare? 



A few thousand years ago human beings came together to achieve various goals and improve the quality of life for all. This thing they came together to form is called society. If you find the idea of having to help your fellow man through taxes so detestable, perhaps you should go live on a deserted island somewhere?



I don't mind helping my fellow man.  I object to the government helping themself to my money, while my fellow man still goes without.  And what happened to my fellow man helping me as well?  Society has gone too far to an entitlement mentality, where everyone thinks their entitled to everything, and therefore need to work for nothing.






Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875