RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


thompsonx -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 6:28:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611

Just the kind of junk you can expect from a socialized healthcare system that the Democrats want and are pushing hard for in this election....

John Edwards now says that a new system he is proposing should FORCE people to see a doctor as a form of preventive care.

Now I agree that it is best to see a doctor often for check-ups. However I do not agree with this idea that the government should force you to go.

What is it that liberals have such a problem trying to understand individual freedom? If someone wants to smoke. If someone wants to eat junk food. If someone refuses to go to a hospital....IT IS THEIR DECISION! It is their life and they should be able to choose how they wnat to live it. Why is this concept so difficult for liberals to understand? I know that having that hot fudge sundae after dinner is not good for my diet. But it should be MY choice whether to eat it or not. I dont need the god damn government to come in and tell me I can't.

Liberals claim they are in favor of freedoms.... I sure as hell dont see much of it in their socialist policies.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070902/ap_on_el_pr/edwards_2


cyberdude:
They make you go to school.
They make you learn how to read and write.
The make you drive on the right side of the road.
They make you get vaccinations for polio, small pox,rubella etc.
The make you get a license to drive.
Where will these fucking socialist stop?
thompson




jaymckenas -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 6:33:18 PM)

As I am finding quite often...

in response to Thompson


Amen.



-Jayson




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 7:20:58 PM)

quote:

yes you need to

Need to what? Edit for spalling? That’s nothing new. I’ve always been a lousy spaller.

quote:

the deal is any constitutional lawyer worth his salt for the socialized healthcare side is going to use that for intimating intent. Then he or she will grab any old amendment and hammer it to mean life, welfare, promote, liberty common defense----

That don’t make it right.

quote:

Your counter arguments councillors? I can be pretty sure such laws would not be found unconstitutional.

And therein lies the great tragedy of our country. I laugh whenever somebody whines about Bush tearing up (or spitting on or shiting on or whatever) the Constitution. That happened a long time ago folks. It baffles me how little most people know about the Constitution. I’m no constitutional scholar but compared to some people... geez.

quote:

But after the laws get passed (another issue) we will deal with that.

But laws creating a national health care insurance program/policy shouldn’t be passed in the first place. They shouldn’t even be considered. If the Senators and Representatives had any integrity they would say, "the Constitution only grants Congress specific (enumerated) powers. Health care isn’t mentioned so we have no authority over it. It is a matter for the States." Ya... I know... fat chance of that happening. Still, that is what should happen. And if Congress goes ahead anyway and tries to exercise authority it doesn’t have, then the Supreme Court should bitch slap ‘em and tell ‘em to keep their greedy paws of things that don’t concern them. Ya... I know... sigh.

I think I was channeling farglebargle there for a moment.

I like spaghetti with vodka sauce and lots of Romano cheese.




farglebargle -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 7:23:38 PM)

quote:


I think I was channeling farglebargle there for a moment.


Ah... The experiment is a success! They told me I was MAD! I'll show them!





Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 7:24:14 PM)

quote:

Where will these fucking socialist stop?

They wont. Like any power hungry group they always seek more and more and more.




thompsonx -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 8:35:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

Where will these fucking socialist stop?

They wont. Like any power hungry group they always seek more and more and more.

Marc2b:
Perhaps that is why we form ourselves into societies...so that we as a group can accomplish more than we can as individuals.
thompson




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 9:06:10 PM)

quote:

Ah... The experiment is a success! They told me I was MAD! I'll show them!


Drops to his knees while clutching his head and screaming, "GET OUT OF MY HEAD! GET OUT OF MY HEAD!"

Cue Twilight Zone music.




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 9:18:46 PM)

quote:

Perhaps that is why we form ourselves into societies...so that we as a group can accomplish more than we can as individuals.


We form ourselves into societies first and foremost for protection.

Accomplishing more than we can as individuals is not necessarily a good thing (societies can accomplish genocide better than individuals can).

The problem is the concentration of power and it’s addictive nature.

The solution to the abuse of concentrated power is not to hand that power to another group. The solution is to diffuse power.




thompsonx -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 9:53:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

Perhaps that is why we form ourselves into societies...so that we as a group can accomplish more than we can as individuals.


We form ourselves into societies first and foremost for protection.
This is opinion not fact.  The smallest society is a man and a woman and that grouping was not for protection but for sex,procreation and increased food gathering potential.

Accomplishing more than we can as individuals is not necessarily a good thing (societies can accomplish genocide better than individuals can).
Of all the societies that have been formed on this planet the number who have chosen to involve themselves in genocide is far outnumbered by those who have not.
 


The problem is the concentration of power and it’s addictive nature.

The solution to the abuse of concentrated power is not to hand that power to another group. The solution is to diffuse power.
The house you live in was not built by an individual.  The road your house is on was not built by an individual.  The wires that bring the electricity to your house were not strung by an individual neither was the power station that generates that electricity built by an individual.  All of the things that you as an individual enjoy in your life were accomplished by society yet you constantly rant against society and anything that smacks of a collective effort while at the same time you continue to luxuriate in the benefits of socialism...like the dog who bites his own tail because it follows him.
thompson
 
 

 





Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 10:20:44 PM)

quote:

This is opinion not fact. The smallest society is a man and a woman and that grouping was not for protection but for sex,procreation and increased food gathering potential.


Protection of the species through reproduction. Protection against starvation.

quote:

Of all the societies that have been formed on this planet the number who have chosen to involve themselves in genocide is far outnumbered by those who have not.


Yet my point remains – the ability of groups to accomplish thing that individuals cannot is not necessarily a good thing.

quote:

The house you live in was not built by an individual. The road your house is on was not built by an individual. The wires that bring the electricity to your house were not strung by an individual neither was the power station that generates that electricity built by an individual.


Did the people who did these things do them for the greater good or for their own personal good (i.e. because it was a paying job)?

quote:

All of the things that you as an individual enjoy in your life were accomplished by society yet you constantly rant against society and anything that smacks of a collective effort


I do not. I rant and rave against socialism because it is a tyrannical despotism based upon the false beliefs that people are incapable of making decision for themselves and that something can be worth other than what it really is.

quote:

while at the same time you continue to luxuriate in the benefits of socialism...like the dog who bites his own tail because it follows him.


No one luxuriates in socialism except the leaders – same as every other tyranny.  I bet Chavez is living pretty high on the hog these days.

It is not collective effort that I am against - it is forced collective effort. 

Socialism is slavery.




Sinergy -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 10:24:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

You can eat all the junk food you want, have a stroke and spend 16 years in a nursing home IF you have the insurance to cover it. Because if you aren't paying for it, then every other taxpayer is. And that's the bottom line.



Gee, I have mentioned this to every body who has ever posted in opposition to unversal health care.

I have yet to receive an articulate response.

Sinergy




MistressMommyNC -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 10:38:17 PM)

"If the Senators and Representatives had any integrity they would say, "the Constitution only grants Congress specific (enumerated) powers. Health care isn’t mentioned so we have no authority over it. It is a matter for the States." Ya... I know.."

Ok, it also doesn't mention education either. No where at all (read it carefully) so..does that mean we do away with funding for education. Each family takes care of educating  their own children and those that can't afford it we leave their kids on the street to continue becoming gang members, and committing crimes? 




Hottiegurl -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 10:45:27 PM)

I am sick of congress and lawmakers.  I too am tired of them telling us what to eat, drink, wear or not to wear, and I can't understand forcing the issue that everyone needs to go see a doctor. 
 
I am full of diverse ideas.  God forbid I change.  People read my car sticker and my license holder and freak.  First of all I have a Bush sticker (people try to remove it).  I don't go removing theirs when I don't agree.  The my plate holder reads: Sex Drugs Rock and Roll.  My conversations at gas pumps are unusal. 
 
Republican yes, gay rights yes, Money should be mine yes, Smoking and drinking yes ( with reservations on how and when) Deep pockets law suits no,  Health care forced no,  Fishing and hunting yes (leave them alone) let me eat hot dogs hamburgers french fries and shakes yes, on one of the other subjects (Fat Tax--- grrrrr)  Pretty soon my taxes are going to be higher than the mortgage. Shssssh.
 
Go figure, I want to join this place for information on wicca and physic stuff and what do I get in the newsletter.  Lets bring down Bush and fix the world.  I guess they don't think someone can be Republican and still have a diverse thought on religion.  Burns my butt, not my bra.




Owner59 -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 10:48:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

This is opinion not fact. The smallest society is a man and a woman and that grouping was not for protection but for sex,procreation and increased food gathering potential.


Protection of the species through reproduction. Protection against starvation.

quote:

Of all the societies that have been formed on this planet the number who have chosen to involve themselves in genocide is far outnumbered by those who have not.


Yet my point remains – the ability of groups to accomplish thing that individuals cannot is not necessarily a good thing.

quote:

The house you live in was not built by an individual. The road your house is on was not built by an individual. The wires that bring the electricity to your house were not strung by an individual neither was the power station that generates that electricity built by an individual.


Did the people who did these things do them for the greater good or for their own personal good (i.e. because it was a paying job)?

quote:

All of the things that you as an individual enjoy in your life were accomplished by society yet you constantly rant against society and anything that smacks of a collective effort


I do not. I rant and rave against socialism because it is a tyrannical despotism based upon the false beliefs that people are incapable of making decision for themselves and that something can be worth other than what it really is.

quote:

while at the same time you continue to luxuriate in the benefits of socialism...like the dog who bites his own tail because it follows him.


No one luxuriates in socialism except the leaders – same as every other tyranny.  I bet Chavez is living pretty high on the hog these days.

It is not collective effort that I am against - it is forced collective effort. 

Socialism is slavery.


"Socialism is slavery."
 
Semantics....




Owner59 -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 10:52:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hottiegurl

I am sick of congress and lawmakers.  I too am tired of them telling us what to eat, drink, wear or not to wear, and I can't understand forcing the issue that everyone needs to go see a doctor. 
 
I am full of diverse ideas.  God forbid I change.  People read my car sticker and my license holder and freak.  First of all I have a Bush sticker (people try to remove it).  I don't go removing theirs when I don't agree.  The my plate holder reads: Sex Drugs Rock and Roll.  My conversations at gas pumps are unusal. 
 
Republican yes, gay rights yes, Money should be mine yes, Smoking and drinking yes ( with reservations on how and when) Deep pockets law suits no,  Health care forced no,  Fishing and hunting yes (leave them alone) let me eat hot dogs hamburgers french fries and shakes yes, on one of the other subjects (Fat Tax--- grrrrr)  Pretty soon my taxes are going to be higher than the mortgage. Shssssh.
 
Go figure, I want to join this place for information on wicca and physic stuff and what do I get in the newsletter.  Lets bring down Bush and fix the world.  I guess they don't think someone can be Republican and still have a diverse thought on religion.  Burns my butt, not my bra.


 am sick of congress and lawmakers.  I too am tired of them telling us what to eat, drink, wear or not to wear, and I can't understand forcing the issue that everyone needs to go see a doctor.

And just who exactly is telling you what to eat or wear?

Be specific.




came4U -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 10:56:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

You can eat all the junk food you want, have a stroke and spend 16 years in a nursing home IF you have the insurance to cover it. Because if you aren't paying for it, then every other taxpayer is. And that's the bottom line.


and

quote:

Gee, I have mentioned this to every body who has ever posted in opposition to unversal health care.


lordy, this is not how universal health care works.

People are free to do as they choose, but on the larger scale the middle or majority of the population does NOT self-abuse, and then a trickle-down effect of education and public aid and/or simple health related health laws (no smoking in any public building allowed) takes place. 

Smoking now, is expensive, 8-12 bucks per pack, why? taxes.  I see no reason why cigarettes shouldn't have higher taxes since they are possibly paying for the healthcare of the smoker in the near or not to near future.

If we all had the attitude that people who eat poorly or make bad decisions in their health and we shouldn't pay then why do we endorse (by ticket and endorsement-product sales) NASCAR, yet deny government funding to farm-aid and or donate zero funding to the local YMCA?

Why? because to do so would be a simple reminder that we are capitalists who are not responsible to what we create as available on our not-so-free market and that we are not responsible to giving our poor better food/price choices within urban areas. 

What kind of responsible human/citizen endorses poor eating habits as long as they can afford their own healthcare? what if I thought all offspring of those that drive an SUV would die a horrible lung-cancerous death?

We are all responsible for our environments, each in different ways.  Do not allow the misdeeds or mis-information direct your diagnosis of others in the same community as unfit to recieve care because they are mis-informed.








NeedToUseYou -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 11:10:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressMommyNC

"If the Senators and Representatives had any integrity they would say, "the Constitution only grants Congress specific (enumerated) powers. Health care isn’t mentioned so we have no authority over it. It is a matter for the States." Ya... I know.."

Ok, it also doesn't mention education either. No where at all (read it carefully) so..does that mean we do away with funding for education. Each family takes care of educating  their own children and those that can't afford it we leave their kids on the street to continue becoming gang members, and committing crimes? 


It means we should do away with funding education at the federal level. Yes, completely 100% correct. But you do realize education could be funded by the state, or county or town.

This logic people use all the time, that if you are against federal control, you must be against the whole of the concept is mind boggling.

You know what I'm against federal health insurance, but if you want to talk state sponsored health plans, completely up to each state.  I'll listen with a less skeptical ear.

Contrary to popular belief variety is good.




Hanable -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 11:13:00 PM)

if i may intereject for a moment.. i may be able to bring a new opinion to the debate.

i am a 19 year old female and i do not have health insurance.. why u ask.. because the only way i could stay on my fathers plan is if i am in college.. and i am currently not going.. i have no money to go and i need to jsut take a break and mature. i will take this semester/year or whatever to get a job and get money so i can become a good citizen and not be some welfare slob (no offence to thoes on it ) who does nothing but sit on my large backside eating yummy carbs.

true im not sure if universial health care is the way to go or the way to fix any of this.. but there has to be something better then the BS greddy private insurance companies that are sucking the people dry.

and on the other systems failing.. most of the systems r failing.. but no one is willing to give the money/support to fix or reform the systems so they continue to fail and become worse. i have my own opinions on how to fix the country.. and i would do many things differently if i were in charge and didnt have all the red tape BULL there is to go threw... legalising things and changing laws r only a few things.

rant done.. i have given more then my $0.02 worth... so ill shut up now.

H >:)




thompsonx -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/3/2007 11:18:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

This is opinion not fact. The smallest society is a man and a woman and that grouping was not for protection but for sex,procreation and increased food gathering potential.


Protection of the species through reproduction. Protection against starvation.
Ahh...the Texas Two Step,sometimes known as waffeling....and sex is protection from what ....boredom?

quote:

Of all the societies that have been formed on this planet the number who have chosen to involve themselves in genocide is far outnumbered by those who have not.


Yet my point remains – the ability of groups to accomplish thing that individuals cannot is not necessarily a good thing.
You seem to be suggesting that because some people do bad things as a group then no groups should be formed.




quote:

The house you live in was not built by an individual. The road your house is on was not built by an individual. The wires that bring the electricity to your house were not strung by an individual neither was the power station that generates that electricity built by an individual.


Did the people who did these things do them for the greater good or for their own personal good (i.e. because it was a paying job)?
Are you saying that doing something for the greater good of society should be for free?  We have public sewers that the government forced the citizens to pay for.  Would you prefer to shit in a bucket?

quote:

All of the things that you as an individual enjoy in your life were accomplished by society yet you constantly rant against society and anything that smacks of a collective effort


I do not. I rant and rave against socialism because it is a tyrannical despotism based upon the false beliefs that people are incapable of making decision for themselves and that something can be worth other than what it really is.
That may be your definition of it but that is not what any political science book will use as a definition.  You live in a socialist country.  You enjoy the benefits of that socialism.  You rant on and on about how bad it is yet offer no constructive alternatives except vague references to self reliance,capitalism,corporatism and so forth.

quote:

while at the same time you continue to luxuriate in the benefits of socialism...like the dog who bites his own tail because it follows him.


No one luxuriates in socialism except the leaders – same as every other tyranny.  I bet Chavez is living pretty high on the hog these days.
You luxuriate in socialism from the education you have to the roads you drive on to the fire and police protection you enjoy.
You do not know dick about Chavez,Castro or Triet yet you castigate them in ignorance.  You assume that they are living large while their constituents live in abject poverty.  Open your mind up a bit and do a little reading.  You rant on and on about this socialist dictator and that socialist dictator yet these people are put in power by their constituents.  They are freely elected  not appointed like our current president.  You make a definition out of thin air as to the nature of socialism and then denigrate it based on your own definition.  Does it ever occur to you to compare what the people in these countries have now as opposed to what they had before?
You rant on and on about how socialist governments are coercive ...all governments are coercive.  If the people in your town vote to raise the tax on property for schools or garbage pick up there will always be at least one person who does not want an increase in taxes but the majority vote and that person looses and is coerced into paying his or her  share of the increase.

It is not collective effort that I am against - it is forced collective effort.
If we are all in a life boat we need collective effort on the oars...if you do not want to do your share then get out of the boat. 

Socialism is slavery.
Saying so does not make it so.




Marc2b -> RE: Edwards wants to force you to see a doctor (9/4/2007 6:30:36 AM)

quote:

Ok, it also doesn't mention education either. No where at all (read it carefully) so..does that mean we do away with funding for education. Each family takes care of educating their own children and those that can't afford it we leave their kids on the street to continue becoming gang members, and committing crimes?


A point I’ve made often. The Federal Government has no business involving itself in education. Since the Constitution doesn’t specifically grant the Federal Government any authority over education, it has no such authority (the very existence of the U.S. Department of Education is illegal). It is up to the States to handle education policy. If a State wants to have a state run school system, that is their prerogative. If they want to leave the matter up to local communities, that too is their prerogative.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875