miikaawaadizi
Posts: 134
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: darksparkle You're both rationalizing. It was a yes or no question.... Can you answer either yes or no? quote:
Where do you draw the line? Or do you? Please do not answer with my master would not ever have me do such things. I'm asking what happens if he does. That is not a yes or no answerable question "what happens if he does?" "yes" "where do you draw the line?" "no" ... that's not english. the only part of the question that could possibly use a yes or a no answer is "or do you?" and the answer is obviously, "yes" ... if you choose to. quote:
ORIGINAL: Niran IMHO, not doing something that is legally or morally wrong isnt failing as a slave. it isn't about failing as a slave. it's about failing to be a slave. if you're a slave, you obey. it's that simple. there are no moral ambiguities, there are no grey areas, you signed up for and claimed the title of slave, you wear the steel, and that's one of the consequences of doing so. she has to make the decision what is more important to her. submitting to the will of her Master, and accepting the consequences of that (including the consequences of anything she does on his behalf), or not. she is still the one that has that safeguard, if the consequences of obeying are more than the consequence of disobeying - to fail to be a slave. because of that safeguard, "my Master made me do it" is not an excuse, or a defence. she made the conscious choice to remain true to her choice to be a slave, with all that comes with it, and chose not to use the safeguard. she has to accept the responsibilities and consequences of that choice. if the girl doesn't like the concept of obeying, because it offends her morals, her principles, or whatever, then the answer is simple - she fails to be a slave, by definition, by disobeying. quote:
> 1. A person who is held in bondage to another; one who is > wholly subject to the will of another; one who is held as > a chattel; one who has no freedom of action, but whose > person and services are wholly under the control of > another. it doesn't matter how many ways people want to try to wriggle out of it ... a slave has no freedom of action. to disobey, to put her own judgement, her own values, her own standards, above those of her Master, is simply not part of the definition. therefore, she fails to be a slave, because the only way she can choose to do that is to not be a slave at the moment she chooses to disobey. that is what it means to be a slave. if a girl wants to place her own limits on what she might be required to do after she's in a Master's steel, if she wants to supplant his judgement with her own, if she wants the "right" to disobey, and those are requirements for her, then she is a subbie, not a slave. subbies set conditions on their submission - slaves do not. it's right there in the definition. anything else is no different than topping from the bottom. ~miika
< Message edited by miikaawaadizi -- 7/15/2005 10:57:03 AM >
|