RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

camille65 -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 6:14:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: came4U I am lost does the guy have 2 gf's that write in green? lol 9/11? is that the topic? oh man. Sigh, thank God it is over. I can't tell what's going on. Green and other colored fonts are too hard for me to read so they get skipped. Along with italic posters lol. I always wonder, am I the only one who has serious trouble reading those that post in colored text?? Maybe if it were bolded or heavily enlarged I could read it. It is frustrating being unable to read stuff dang it. Edit/Added: Yanno, to me it seemed that CuriousLord was asking a genuine questions. Yet he was given sarcastic replies. Why is that? He isn't a troll, he has been here awhile and most here have spoken to him via the forum. So why the hassle when he asked a pretty basic question?

came4U -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 6:24:47 AM)
I just figured it out, she has two profiles lol. dohhh

sambamanslilgirl -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 6:33:47 AM)
as unpatriotic as this may sound to many of you - i don't care to remember the events of 9/11 nor do i wish to mourn the lives lost in any way. i deplore the annual media circus and the speeches concocted with lies to drum up support for the "war". my opinions are clearly expressed in my journal.

came4U -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 7:08:57 AM)
I enjoy watching the journalists on local and bigger (CNN) that are back-tracking now according to the viewpoints of popular polls of the American citizens. Earlier it was a cool thing to make their personal/station political views public in support for the war and this 'accusation' of Saddam and Iraq. Now, that the origional ideal of 'womd' has been mis-proven it only shows there is no actual free press left anymore. I didn't need to see any Michael Moore documentary to know this war/invasion and mis-use of troops was bullshit to begin with. I am ashamed the Canada was cohersed to join this war out of sheer peer pressure. We should have stuck to our origional stance and not sent troops, supplies or even civilian sponsorship. 9/11, such sadness. It happened for a reason. It was prompted invasion.

KatyLied -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 7:20:51 AM)
quote: does the guy have 2 gf's that write in green? Same girl; two different screen names.

came4U -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 8:46:15 AM)
quote: Same girl; two different screen names. If I get another name, could I agree with other-self more and have a pretend fwiend?

girl4you2 -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 9:06:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: camille65 I can't tell what's going on. Green and other colored fonts are too hard for me to read so they get skipped. Along with italic posters lol. I always wonder, am I the only one who has serious trouble reading those that post in colored text?? Maybe if it were bolded or heavily enlarged I could read it. It is frustrating being unable to read stuff dang it. Edit/Added: Yanno, to me it seemed that CuriousLord was asking a genuine questions. Yet he was given sarcastic replies. Why is that? He isn't a troll, he has been here awhile and most here have spoken to him via the forum. So why the hassle when he asked a pretty basic question? Camille et al, i have written in this font and colour for a very long time. it's not day glow pink, it's not brown and huge, nor is it dark blue. i've not read people complaining about any of those, although i'm sure it could have happened but i just missed it. i personally find huge bolded type offensive, almost akin to shouting, but that's just how i feel about it. i'm irish, i don't pick an offensive colour, and i've used this colour without any previous complaints for a long time. hopefully, enough said. i've even responded to posts of yours in this colour, without it being bolded or enlarged, and you seem to have welcomed the information. i am sorry if this type font and colour make things hard for you; that's not the intent. i'm also not a troll. i've contributed in worthwhile fashion to many topics, from medical advisement to politics. i don't follow people around, i don't hassle them on the other side. and i express my opinions. again, i don't see the problem in this, but i am sure some find an issue with it. i came on this name, having had a new name made a little bit ago, as this name had more "credence" after the number of posts one had was challenged and brought up as an indication of whether one should be listened to or some such. a problem for folks? sorry about that. i do have opinions, and i'm going to express them. if someone wants to see who i am, i made an introductory post, kinda like lucky albatross did when she switched from emerald slave. i made no pretense about who i am, nor will i do so now or in the future. go figure. if in doubt, and folks don't recall, the signature line being the same is a really big hint.

Sinergy -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 9:21:28 AM)
What I find interesting is that this thread about 9/11 non-sympathizers has devolved into a bunch of character attacks on a specific poster who happens to have two profiles with identical text and identical pictures, and the associated confusion for some people unable to comprehend that the person might have two profiles. Then there is the character baiting about people not having anything worthwhile to add to a discussion until they have some specific number of posts. The poster making those comments needs to type more to catch up to my number of posts. [sarcasm] At which point I might stop rolling my eyes and thinking "newbie with nothing intelligent to add" every time the person posts. [/sarcasm] Throw in the attacks at me from somebody who is upset because a former submissive of mine used to post intelligent posts and for some odd reason (heaven forbid) we generally agreed on specific issues, and the associated name calling and attempts to minimize somebody elses contributions to the board. I would like to suggest that people who are still confused by what is going on to go and peruse the profiles for girl4you2 and sinergysdarlin, use Venn diagrams, graph paper, and your big crayons to help you track the vital information. And then we can all go back to discussing the topic in question. Thank you, Sinergy

came4U -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 9:26:05 AM)
I don't know or care who is who, but did this person use two diff names on the same thread? Wasn't that the confusion? I am glad all this 9/11 nonsense is over btw.

Sinergy -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 9:36:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: came4U I don't know or care who is who, but did this person use two diff names on the same thread? Wasn't that the confusion? [sarcasm] The absolute unmitigated gall of some people. [/sarcasm] Sinergy

girl4you2 -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 9:38:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: came4U I don't know or care who is who, but did this person use two diff names on the same thread? Wasn't that the confusion? I am glad all this 9/11 nonsense is over btw. quote: ORIGINAL: girl4you2 i came on this name, having had a new name made a little bit ago, as this name had more "credence" after the number of posts one had was challenged and brought up as an indication of whether one should be listened to or some such. a problem for folks? sorry about that. i do have opinions, and i'm going to express them. if someone wants to see who i am, i made an introductory post, kinda like lucky albatross did when she switched from emerald slave. i made no pretense about who i am, nor will i do so now or in the future. go figure. if in doubt, and folks don't recall, the signature line being the same is a really big hint. let me try to make this really clear. my signature line is the same as the signature line for sinergysdarlin. i'm one and the same. i went back to this name last night/this morning when my credence was questioned as sinergysdarlin because my number of posts were not high enough. i introduced myself as being sinergysdarlin in the introduce yourself thread a little bit ago. i kept this account, much as lucky albatross/emerald slave has done. most likely, i'll go back to using this name to post to any thread in which my post numbers are a problem. i hope that clears things up just a tad. any further questions can be sent directly to me. thank you. edited to add this is in reply to came4u2. sorry, i was multitasking whilst posting. i'll try not to do that again.

came4U -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 10:22:48 AM)
whooaah I didn't even read all of the pages here yet, too tired today. I guess I missed something. Not sure why I am being dragged into something LOL I don't do drama. Having two niks is drama in itself. Maybe, if she made a mistake by using both niks in the same thread she will learn now that it doesn't look good (or credible). sigh, I don't get personal here, so don't force me, nor does anyone need to get personal with me. It is yukky, even if it is for cheap/free entertainment. btw..does anyone think that eventually that the internet will be pay as you surf (besides the porn sites etc) and thus makes us more responsible for our wasted searches/time if we are charged like a phone bill per web-session? Would it enhance or reduce income of our net-cable/phone/satellite companies or increase? Should every sight recieve a fee for enterance? Like a payphone fee for every (even if wrong number) call?

Loathed -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 10:33:22 AM)
I would be happy to pay per use if there was some filter on the system to keep certain personalities separate. A horrible thing for a deviant to say, no? Seriously, there should be a test or something making it a needed thing to have some basic skill in life before one is allowed total dominion over a keyboard. Or, maybe some D's need to go back to basics with their pets. Yea first post!

came4U -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 10:35:34 AM)
well, no that wouldn't count, I meant pay per log-on for a site, the content or members of the site, is another story. <wishes the world was flat, I would push some people off. (but it ain't) lol.

KatyLied -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 10:46:34 AM)
~fr~ regarding free entertainment One of the reasons I come here is for entertainment. Free entertainment. It affirms that I am doing well in my life when I see the folly of others. Most of it has nothing to do with lifestyle and everything with dysfunction that seems to find its fruition on-line.

came4U -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 10:50:14 AM)
[:D] katy, quit lyingggg!! dammit lol

girl4you2 -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 11:32:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: came4U whooaah I didn't even read all of the pages here yet, too tired today. I guess I missed something. Not sure why I am being dragged into something LOL I don't do drama. Having two niks is drama in itself. Maybe, if she made a mistake by using both niks in the same thread she will learn now that it doesn't look good (or credible). sigh, I don't get personal here, so don't force me, nor does anyone need to get personal with me. It is yukky, even if it is for cheap/free entertainment. btw..does anyone think that eventually that the internet will be pay as you surf (besides the porn sites etc) and thus makes us more responsible for our wasted searches/time if we are charged like a phone bill per web-session? Would it enhance or reduce income of our net-cable/phone/satellite companies or increase? Should every sight recieve a fee for enterance? Like a payphone fee for every (even if wrong number) call? i made no mistake in using two names on the same post, and i have explained the reasons for doing so. You asked a question, i explained. again, if you've got an issue with this, feel free to contact me on the other side.

girl4you2 -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 11:34:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Loathed I would be happy to pay per use if there was some filter on the system to keep certain personalities separate. A horrible thing for a deviant to say, no? Seriously, there should be a test or something making it a needed thing to have some basic skill in life before one is allowed total dominion over a keyboard. Or, maybe some D's need to go back to basics with their pets. Yea first post! welcome to the boards, Loathed. would You care to pose the list of questions whereby one's competency skills would be tested? i'll gladly take the test when You do. i hope You have a great day.

girl4you2 -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 11:35:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KatyLied quote: does the guy have 2 gf's that write in green? Same girl; two different screen names. thank You very much for Your assistance in clearing up this matter. it is appreciated.

SugarMyChurro -> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers (9/12/2007 11:56:59 AM)
CuriousLord: You ask for specifics, but it really boils down to this: the president is daily given briefings that allow him to reevaluate the changing security situation. Bush is not interested in such things; he is interested in profiteering and cronyism. If a situation can be turned into dollars for all of his buddies and offshore kickbacks for the Bush family, then Georgie sleeps soundly at night. What's my proof? The history of the last six years. Do the research, man. It cannot all be spoon fed to you. More specific than that I do not care to be at this time. I wasn't 14 when Shrub rose to power. I am not a genius. My girlfriend's have not tended to call me "God" or 'Lord" or whatever. My penis is normal sized. I am not a constant source of amazement even to myself. So clearly, you have me at a disadvantage.

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.882813E-02