Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
~fr~ A lot of people are confused over limits. This is because of fuzzy terminology. I've offered a more precise alternative in the past, and although I don't expect people to adopt it, I will still point out that we would not see a thread with no progress in 241 posts if people had done so, and people would have a better idea of what they mean, i.e. communication would be easier. Vaguely hoping it will at least serve to clarify things, I will restate the terms and their meanings here: - Personal limits - These refer to what people are unwilling or unable to comply with (hard), or what they will find very difficult to comply with (soft). Most, if not all, people will have one or more things that they will at least find difficult to comply with, and the laws of physics and limits of biology are hard limits for us all, so no need for snide remarks.
- Relationship limits - These refer to the scope of the consent given, which means that crossing these lines will constitute a revocation of consent, effective immediately. It says nothing about what these things mean to the sub, merely what the sub has consented to the dominant doing. For slaves, it would be more appropriate to call these easements, as that is the term used in property law, but few distinguish between sub and slave here, so I'll not comment further on that.
There are things that are personal limits for nephandi, that are still within the scope of her consent. I would personally be wary in crossing her personal limits in most, if not all, circumstances, but she has given consent to for me to cross them as I wish. This is not just a matter of trust, but a matter of the reality of power exchange, that force can and will be used at times, and rightly so. There are, however, a few relationship limits, presently that of intentional injuries of a permanent nature (including mental injury and, obviously, death) and intentionally making her violate her morality. Not that I am inclined to do so, but these are the things we've specifically listed, and they are in part extensions of a promise I made before we discovered our mutual interest in M/s. I have never encountered anyone whose hard personal limits have not included one or more of my kinks, and I do not expect to ever do so, either. But I have encountered those whose relationship limits have permitted them all, and not just because they trust that they will not have to rely on such limits to protect them. While I've not met them in person, I would say daddysprop and BeingChewsie both fit that definition, according to what they say, in that they both have personal limits, but neither has relationship limits, and their owners will enforce compliance if necessary. That deserves respect, not ridicule, in my book. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|