AAkasha -> RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner (8/17/2005 1:29:06 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SweetDommes quote:
ORIGINAL: Angrylibrarian without a submissives overt weakness (and in some cases feminization) Submissives do not automatically have an "overt weakness." Submissive does NOT equal weak, or lesser in any way. The problem is that too many people see it how you do, including most submissives that we've talked to over the last few years. They think that just because they have submissive urges that it makes them weaker, or less of a person/man - and it's just not true. It takes a great deal of personal strength to admit, not only to themselves, but to others, that they are submissive and willing to go for what they want, so how does that make them weak in any way? I'm not talking about those who feel themselves worthless so they must be submissive because that absolves them of personal responsibility (and there are plenty of of those). Personally, some of the strongest people I know are submissives - both male and female. And of course, I'm not talking physical strength, but strength of personality - a sense of knowing exactly who and what they are. Unfortunately, they are not all compatable with us - but knowing that and being able to accept it is part of that personal strength that I'm talking about. They know who they are and what they are looking for - and are willing to accept nothing less, even if it means continuing to look. There is absolutely nothing "weak" about that. I think a great deal of the problem is based on Femdom porn. Men have an ideal in their head, based on what they have read and seen in porn, of "how it is supposed to be." At the same time, I think women who are attracted to dominance develop and explore their tendencies in a realistic way and are searching for something beyond what the porn portrays. Men get programmed to think that they should behave in that ultra submissive worm mode and that the woman should behave in accordance to the femdom persona. I'd like to think that if they made "femdom porn" for women it would feature a confident, sensual woman and a self confident man she seduces and brings into submission and you see it as an erotic transformation and actually see that there *was* in fact a power exchange. This is quite different from the gimp in the leather mask that comes crawling into the room in scene ONE. Men need to be reprogrammed. Most of them realize, after experiences with a few "real life" femdoms, that it's actually much better in the real world, minus the silly roles and lame behavior, and then when appropriate levels of fetish and toys are introduced it's exciting and erotic. Some men, however, will never really click with that; they really want the fetish, the fantasy, *and* the problem is that what flips their switch *is* to behave like that whining, worthless worm -- out of the gate. What furthers this disconnect is pro domination to some extent. But only in cases where a guy sees pros for so long, he is used to that kind of scene and behavior and sees it as the ideal. Now, what makes it even more complicated, in my opinion, is that "new" femdoms who are learning and exploring come into it, and they see these cliche femdom behaviors online (pro ads, or web sites, or money-hunters with fake profiles) and think that's what they are supposed to "do" to attract a submissive partner so they can begin to explore in real life. There are elements of the cliche "dominatrix" that many of us enjoy, I think -- don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the whole persona is a joke. But I think men get too involved in that ideal and structure and it's too unreasonable. And when it comes to trying to get an open minded vanilla woman interested, those cliches are a sure-fire way to get her turned off. Akasha
|
|
|
|