missturbation -> RE: Why is Punishment not seen as Abusive? (10/1/2007 12:04:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bobkgin quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail your reasoning is cloudy.... first, you may feel whatever you feel about it....... but the couching of the arguments in the line you have is not the codex on how it is thought of by all. Self-esteem improves through accomplishment. This may be true in and of itself. Punishment is payment exacted for failure. This may be true in and of itself. Where's the connection? This is not aught to do with either of the above statements, except as you see the world. I would say there is no connection to those two statements either. I'd say there is a connection: punishment erodes self-esteem. Not for everyone. Punishment treats mistakes in a cynical way, whereas correction addresses mistakes in an optimistic way. Punishment - correction = same same. Punishment paradigm seems to dictate that the sub/slave must suffer in addition to any and all suffering she's already experiencing as a direct result of the mistake. Yes and? Sort of like: "your mistake broke your arm, and so I am going to break the other one to make you pay for your mistake" Huh? This just doesnt make any sense. how does breaking your arm by mistake mean you are going to be punished, incoherent comparison. What would the punishment be if the sub mistakenly burned down the house? Strokes of the cane for me. Punishment comes across as gratuitous violence: you make a mistake (you will always make mistakes) get punished (you will always get punished). For you, not everyone. Your way is not the one true way, your thoughts are not the one true thoughts. Where is the incentive to stop making mistakes? I don't like being punished, i dont like letting Sir down. There two incentives for you.
|
|
|
|