Lumus
Posts: 5968
Joined: 9/16/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent What are your thoughts on the concept of free will? Has anyone here ever played chess? If so, then you knw that you begin with a small, set series of choices. As the environment of the board changes, the choices available increase; and as action and reaction occur, the choices slowly dwindle in number until there are none. While simplistic in concept, I think it may be applied to life if one accepts that it suits as a generalization. Free will is, to my mind, acknowledging that there is always more than one option, and that we have the ability to choose whatever option we like, for whatever motivations, and that said choice is ours to make. By this definition I would agree that free will exists conceptually [to our perceptions, conditionally, as there are times when it simply may not apply]. It cannot always be enacted due to inherent restrictions, which can range anywhere from moral compulsion to physics. Within the framework of the perceptions we possess, then, free will is possible. Most people would prefer to argue it is or it isn't; I find that a bit too limiting and a trifle dishonest, as far as perceptions versus reality goes. Tipping the hat to determinism, the same generality applies. One may state that every outcome can be pretermined in an almost callous, precise, mathematical, Einsteinian way. However, while this may be comforting and appealing to the rational, logical mindset, it presumes that 2+2 is 4 until the universe, in her infinite wisdom, brings large values of 2 into the picture. I suspect that, like Einstein, if one embraces that all things may be calculated down to predictable outcomes one is bound to turn religious; for what is a divine entity if not a being capable of conceiving all actions and reactions? We mere mortals are fallible, and so, it follows that we cannot calculate all outcomes, which means in turn we can only assume it exists. Thus, conceptually, determinism may be possible within the perceptions we possess; it cannot be taken as hard fact because frankly, we are not divine. I'll stick with the Lumus theory. It states that the Universe is just a spinning coin, gleaming brilliantly. Which side of the coin are you gazing upon as it spins - and would you even recognize the side in question, for the speed at which the coin spins? In this instance, let's be blase and assume free will is stamped indelibly on one side, determinism on the other. When you gaze upon a spinning coin its dance may seem a blur, so are you seeing free will; determinism; the blurred vagaries that lie in the middle? The coin is chaos, and your perceptions are the logic trying to stop the coin's motion. Concept is not fact, only the mask of wooden fact made from intellectual shavings. To flatly state choice is one thing or another is ignorance based on what we think we know. I'll happily accept my ignorance of answers that only perfect beings can truly know, if for no other reason that I am imperfect, in an imperfect universe, and relate better to my imperfect environment when I live in it, rather than trying to conceive it. [Besides...birth is for girls. I'm a boy. I has a penis.] *slips out before thinking too hard so he can live hard instead*
_____________________________
<Talk to educate; listen to learn.> ~ the other half of "L&L" ~ I have been dubbed the Rainmaker. Do not make me take your water for my tribe.
|