SusanofO
Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005 Status: offline
|
I don't know why people say these things, or think them. If you substitute the word "slave" for the word "partner", when someone presumes to say such ridiculous things - the silliness of such a presumption becomes obvious: "You're too smart or strong to be a partner". Sounds a littlle silly when phrased that way, doesn't it? It does to me. Hmmm. Maybe it's just me, but whether I am a sub, a slave, or a Domme (I can be all three, since I am a Switch) - I don't want a stupid or weak partner for myself - and I am presuming anyone with whom I'd want to spend any substantial amount of time in a partner relationship (even if it wasn't "romantic", but a more emotionally distant form of some BDSM activity-related liason) - wouldn't desire me to be stupid or weak, as their partner, either. If they did, then they'd be with the wrong partner for me, that's for sure. Different strokes, and all of that - maybe some prefer stupid and weak (however they might not come right out and say it) - but for me, I never thought that either of those qualities made for great "partner material" - no matter what "role" anyone was taking on. And I still don't. I am not sure where anyone gets the idea that to be a "slave" is to be weak, or stupid or otherwise not up to "par" (whatever that means for any given person, anyway). I know being a "slave" can manifest itself in all sorts of emotional and relationship-oriented ways. People create their own BDSM relationships - just like they do in the "Vanilla" world, IMO. You can make it work however you want it to work - or not. I suppose there aren't really any "rules" other than anything I'd ever view as anything other than broad "guidelines" gleaned from other people's experiences. And there are so many people, and they all have such individual experiences - how can anyone actually boil it down and say: A "slave" is X, but never, ever Y, etc. There is always, always, IMO an exception somewhere, to whatever "rule" anyone would want to impose on this kind of relationship. Except for maybe the one that says: "What a Master/Mistress says goes"...all the rest is bendable. And if a slave has a Master or a Mistress whose "rules" they find altogether objectionable all or most of the time, then - IMO, that person is definitely in the wrong relationship - for them. **There is (presumably) - some sort of process of negotiation that ensues, before a committment is made (although I have my doubts this is always the case before some embark upon BDSM relationships). IMO - whatever two people want to negotiate as "acceptable" from a partner is between them, not the entire BDSM world. **People are individuals, with individual desires and needs, whether slave or Master. Anyone who actually doesn't realize this, isn't someone I'd probably want as a partner. Slave, or Dominant - IMO, people do have a right to seek happiness via their personal relationships and partnerships. I guess for me, the key would be to find someone who I "clicked with" on a lot of levels, and for whom I could fulfill dreams and desires of the kind they seek - as well as they would wish to sincerely attempt to do that for me. If our "needs" don't mesh well- and our personalities don't "click" well together - ir if they do - then it doesn't really matter what the other person's "title" is - does it? To me - it should not. Other people may agree or disagree, but that is how I view things for myself, as far as my view of potential (or actual) BDSM relationships are concerned . -Susan
< Message edited by SusanofO -- 10/1/2007 9:29:05 PM >
_____________________________
"Hope is the thing with feathers, That perches in the soul, And sings the tune without the words, And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson
|