Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..."


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 8:37:06 AM   
Bobkgin


Posts: 1335
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Kawarthas, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

Psychiatry is a quasi-science for me because once it gets outside of organic causes it enters the world of philosophy.



Psychiatry is based in the medical study of brain chemistry, it is not quasi science nor is it part of the world of philosophy. 



Whenever you have to ascertain what is "real" and what is not, you've entered the world of philosophy.

Psychiatry can no more seperate itself from its subjective assumptions than philosophy. Those assumptions are formed within the matrix of the majority beliefs.



You don't know much about psychiatry if you think it is based on subjective assumptions and philosophy.  If you are correct then answer me this... how is it that psychiatry has helped schizophrenics, depressives, bi polars, psychotics? 



See the portion of my quote highlighted in red.

The catagories you've listed have organic causes.

quote:


i am not talking about psychotherapy - that is subjective and only as useful and helpful as the person reporting what is happening to them (the problem they have). 


Partly true. It is also contingent on the bias of the therapist.

But this is the branch of psychiatry I've been talking about, the part I view with suspicion.

quote:


You don't seem to differentiate the two. 


You do not seem to notice when I do. Review the portion of my quote I highlighted in red. It very clearly distinguishes between the two.


_____________________________

When all is said and done, what will you regret?

That you never really lived?

Or there was so much living left to do?

For those interested: pics and poetry have been added to my profile.

(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 8:41:40 AM   
Bobkgin


Posts: 1335
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Kawarthas, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

So all they are doing is telling shrinks not to use a euro-centric bias when trying to diagnose the "delusions" of people from other cultures.

Instead, the shrinks are to use the bias of the other culture (assuming the shrink has an inkling of what that is, given his/her dominant euro-centric bias).

It is still the same argument:

The world was flat when the majority said it was flat, anyone who disagreed was crazy.
The world became round when the majority said it was round, and anyone who says it is flat is crazy.

It presumes that only "average" people are "normal", and that everyone else is crazy.



No Bob, any cultural belief not just euro centric ones - where in my post did i say the cultural belief had to be euro centric?  


Perhaps you'll highlight the portion of my quote where I said the cultural bias had to be euro-centric, because I don't see it.


quote:


The world did not become round when the majority said it was round it always was round and the awareness of it as such became prevalent when science had the tools necessary to discover it.  Anyone who believed it to be flat was more then likey misinformed rather then crazy. 


I think you are missing the metaphor.


_____________________________

When all is said and done, what will you regret?

That you never really lived?

Or there was so much living left to do?

For those interested: pics and poetry have been added to my profile.

(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 8:49:16 AM   
velvetears


Posts: 2933
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

Psychiatry is a quasi-science for me because once it gets outside of organic causes it enters the world of philosophy.



Psychiatry is based in the medical study of brain chemistry, it is not quasi science nor is it part of the world of philosophy. 



Whenever you have to ascertain what is "real" and what is not, you've entered the world of philosophy.

Psychiatry can no more seperate itself from its subjective assumptions than philosophy. Those assumptions are formed within the matrix of the majority beliefs.



You don't know much about psychiatry if you think it is based on subjective assumptions and philosophy.  If you are correct then answer me this... how is it that psychiatry has helped schizophrenics, depressives, bi polars, psychotics? 



See the portion of my quote highlighted in red.

The catagories you've listed have organic causes.

quote:


i am not talking about psychotherapy - that is subjective and only as useful and helpful as the person reporting what is happening to them (the problem they have). 


Partly true. It is also contingent on the bias of the therapist.

But this is the branch of psychiatry I've been talking about, the part I view with suspicion.

quote:


You don't seem to differentiate the two. 


You do not seem to notice when I do. Review the portion of my quote I highlighted in red. It very clearly distinguishes between the two.



Give me examples of when psychiatry (modern day psychiatry) deals with any symptom outside of trying to find an organic cause? 

Psychiatrists today don't do "talk therapy", they listen to symptoms very carefully, just like a doctor does, and prescribe medication.  If symptoms don't improve they try a different med till one works.  One usually goes to a psychiatrist after a referral from a therspist who suspects the patient may have a an "organic problem" - imbalance in brain chemistry. 


_____________________________

Religion is for people who are scared of hell, Spirituality is for people who have been there

(in reply to Bobkgin)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 8:55:43 AM   
GoldStallion


Posts: 68
Joined: 8/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wickad

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoldStallion

I would always want to know about the health problems of any prospective partner - and pretty early on. Like before I start a physical relationship. It wouldnt be grounds for elimination (metaphorically or, probably, literally) as long as they wanted to sort themselves out ie get to the point where they are healthy without any tablets. Even if thats a long haul for them, as long as they are up for taking that journey I'd be OK. We are all mentally ill, there is not one perfectly balanced person alive or in existence now or ever; its just a matter of degree. Health does not come from a medicine cabinet. Health comes from how we deal with who we are and from taking part in objective reality and living life.


I added the bold.

I find this statement incredibly ignorant.  Someone taking medication to combat any type of illness should not stop taking said medication if that medication is necessary.  Suggesting to a diabetic that you would be happy to have a relationship with them as soon as they quit taking their insulin would never be suggested.  However, suggesting to a bipolar person that they quit taking the medication that corrects an imbalance in brain chemicals is some how acceptable.

I suggest that folks look into some of the illness they are talking about before they do all the judging based on false information or prejudice.

Wickad


I am baffled by your response here. As you are calling me ignorant, then its ok for me to call you illiterate I assume? read the bold you put in there - where does it say I would not start the relationship if they were ill? I would want to KNOW THE SCORE before starting the relationship is what I said in the previous two sentences. The bit in bold means that their problems wouldnt necessarily mean I was going to eliminate them from consideration, so long as they were willing to work on their problems and ideally to the point where they no longer need their pills.(Its called healing)
 
 
Wickad, please answer
1. Where does it say I think they should stop taking the medication if that medication is necessary?
(What I actually say is they should stop taking the medication if they can get to the point where it is not necessary.)

2. And where do I suggest that I would only be happy to have a relationship after they had stopped taking their medications?
(What I actually say is that I would want to see that they had a desire to sort themselves out, even if that was a long process (and usually its hard work, with no shortcuts and often with crap advice ))

I know what you are trying to say, and I agree with your points. However, you have not understood me at all. What you have done is put a slant on my post to suit your view of what I am saying, without actually looking at the facts ie what I have actually written.

As I said, baffled.

PS you think I am prejudiced as well? Explain that one too if you reply. I get to call you another name for that: Muppet.

x





_____________________________

You can lead an idiot to knowledge, but you cant make them think.


(in reply to Wickad)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 8:56:20 AM   
Prinsexx


Posts: 4584
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Is  your partner on behavioral medication?  Anything from tranquilizers, anti-anxiety, attention deficit, to bi-polar disorder meds.
I have had partners who have been yes. Bi=polar personaliteis run in my family and I find them fascinating and am attracted also to a perticular type of creativiyt I consider goes along with that condition. The so-called new neuroleptics are very efficient at controlling extremes of symptoms.
I have also taken medication for anxiety and dperession and take a low level anti-depressant which helps to control the pain of my physical impairment. Where physical impairment and mental impairment ends and begins is, both in my personal and professional opinion a continuum rather than a definite 'line'. Therefore would I, do I and should I have the same attitude to pain killers, insulin, or indeed use of alcohol? Rhetorical question.


Should someone on these meds declare their situation up front? Why? Do we declare this up front on a daily basis to everyone we are in relationsip with? And up front of what? Up front of a telehone call as in I take Prozac and by the way my name is Paul?

Is it fair going into a new relationship, not knowing the full extent of someone's medical history?  Yes it is fair as we do it everyday...the person who dives our taxi, our airplane or who teaches our children.

How safe is play, when someone is heavily reliant on these types of medications? First of all no such thing as these types of medication. IMPO (personal opinion) I consider smoking cigarettes disgusting and nauseating and alcohol to be seriously dangerous.

Should the reason for our partner being on theses medications be looked into a little deeper?  By whom? I think human rights are far more important and actually the ethical and medical efficacy of those presribing medication is in large part a good enough safeguard for me.

I have come across many people over the years, both in and out of the 'BDSM World', that have been on behavioral medication, both dominants, and submissives.  In my experiences, and those shared with me by others, the majority of them have been positive.  I do agree with this statement.

There are of course those negative, and harrowing experiences that also come to mind.  Without going into specifics, there have been many occasions, that many people, have not found out till much later on that their partner has this need.
  I think it is really all about individual case histories and there is nothing to be gained necessarily from drawing generalised conclusions. I do feel that contraindications and drug interactions are growing increasingly more complax and that there are many, myself included, who tend to ignore warnings, especially the avoidance of alcohol. I also feel that there is a tendency, myself included, to take a medication, feel 'normal' and then stop taking i. In effect this is the fallacy of self-medication.  Few of us want to admit and find it tdifficult to accept that we have a condition, whetber it be so-called psychological or physical which is permanent and never going to go away.

Whether it is a psychological, or clinical need, to give them some normality to their life, they are engaging in a very physical, and mentally challenging 'world', as the BDSM world can be.  Some handle it well, some on the other hand are putting themselves, and their partners at great risk.  L anoook: in this lifestyle we may think we are terribly different.....but actually I do not believe we are. I think there is as much risk, if not more, to crossing a busy road than being tied up by an experienced Master. There is however the whole arena of consensuality. Is it possibible to give consent when we could not otherwise do so, supoosing for example we have given ther the power of attorney for our actions.

Have you ever experienced your partner, during a 'play situation' just suddenly switch frame of mind,.............yes, and i have and yes we call it switching!!!!.......... not realize who, or where they are, and completely freak out? ....yes but this can happen just as easily if the other (or we ourselves) have taken illiciit substances and not those 'pushed' by the state. Did you do something wrong, or is it the effect, or reasons for their need for the medication?  Who would ever really know but I have known of unusual situations..........but I would have to say created because of psychiatric need inother words, a need which cannot be changed, abated or alleviated by medication.

During play, did you trigger a past bad memory or situation?
  Not that I am aware of but I have had flashbacks triggered inn me and those have been both the most psychologically painful yet the most rewardning

It is always good to get to know your partner, but that would also mean taking a lot of time going over their past also.  Something not a lot of people do now days, to many are to eager to just rush into play without thinking of the consequences.
  I agree with this........ If someone is comfortable with you, they should and may disclose this very personal and private information about themselves.  Trust and good communication always being an integral part of it all, you would hope that some of the bad from the past, if it exists, would be disclosed.  I consider consensual and safe play needs also to be 'sane'....it is the third component and this debate, which is an important one you have started, I thinkk the sane dimension is the more difficult to define. What is ane for one might be totally derailing for the other whether medication is involved or not.

What do you do if your partner does have problems?   As always, discussion afterwards can be good, to try to find out what the trigger was.  Maybe discussing what their attraction to the BDSM world is, some people strive to find something in it, and it may not be a good reason for their participation.  After care and follow-up is crucial. If it is just play even more imporatant as the relationship may not extend much beyond the time frame of the play itself.

Would therapy be a better option? Well you know my answer has got to be yes. I do not post here in my professional capacity but I can never be other than I am. What underpins my professional life is an ethical code of practice which prohibits me from causing harm to another. I sincerely hope that I also am ethical in my private life..

There are going to be many reactions to this post, I am sure, some good some bad.  The purpose, is to get a reaction, and hopefully bring to light for some people, questions to ask, signs to look for, and what to do next when and if they find themselves in this type of situation.  Yes: and thankyou for starting this thread. There's more, if not endless reams I could say on the subject.

It is always a good thing to question yourself on your own reasons, or someone else’s, for this type of lifestyle or play, even better to always keep an open mind.  No matter what experiences we have all had, there is always a new situation coming around the corner that we may or may not have the means or experience to handle.   “We are forever learning, and someone who thinks they know it all, plays the fool.” It wouild be nice, I often think, to know rather less tahn I do.

Prinnie xxxx

(in reply to TheEnglishDom)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 8:57:34 AM   
velvetears


Posts: 2933
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin


Perhaps you'll highlight the portion of my quote where I said the cultural bias had to be euro-centric, because I don't see it.



The DSM says if a person shows signs of having a delusion, that person being diagnosed delusional is ruled out if it stems from popular cultural belief.  So if a European therapist was seeing a South American patient he would have to take into account the persons cultural beliefs before he made a judgement as to whether or not the person was delusional or not.  Hope that clears it up for you. 




_____________________________

Religion is for people who are scared of hell, Spirituality is for people who have been there

(in reply to Bobkgin)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 8:58:31 AM   
Bobkgin


Posts: 1335
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Kawarthas, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chellekitty

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

I suppose I should be honoured by the implicit message that the only reason for debating me is to convince me I am wrong.



lmao...only you bobby....no......

i go into debates knowing that i can be proved wrong....i was wondering if that was a possibility in your mind....



For me, life is a learning experience that never ends. I've always accepted the possibility that what I believe now will be replaced by something better at some point in the future.

I rarely see anything that constitutes "proof" in a discussion/debate. But I do read the opinions of those who express them and I express my own.

I view discussions like a smorgasbord: you take what you need and leave the rest.

I learn more about individuals from the things they say. I learn (or at least make the effort) to see things from the point of view of others.

Which is not to say I give the same weight to everyone: I am biased in favour of the mature and intelligent.

_____________________________

When all is said and done, what will you regret?

That you never really lived?

Or there was so much living left to do?

For those interested: pics and poetry have been added to my profile.

(in reply to chellekitty)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:05:43 AM   
Bobkgin


Posts: 1335
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Kawarthas, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin


Perhaps you'll highlight the portion of my quote where I said the cultural bias had to be euro-centric, because I don't see it.



The DSM says if a person shows signs of having a delusion, that person being diagnosed delusional is ruled out if it stems from popular cultural belief.  So if a European therapist was seeing a South American patient he would have to take into account the persons cultural beliefs before he made a judgement as to whether or not the person was delusional or not.  Hope that clears it up for you. 



Quite.

So a European shrink who has grown up with European biases has to become an expert on South American "popular cultural beliefs" to properly diagnose and treat a South American for 'delusion".

And how many years, months, weeks, days will this European shrink invest in this study for this one patient so as to not make a mistake in the diagnosis or treatment? And what is the patient to do while waiting for this shrink to learn enough to tell the patient whether he/she is deluded or not?

And people wonder why I have a healthy disrespect for psychiatry.

On edit:

Just a footnote - but BDSM is not a "popular cultural belief". Thus belief that BDSM is not crazy would be "delusional" according to your formula.

< Message edited by Bobkgin -- 10/3/2007 9:10:12 AM >


_____________________________

When all is said and done, what will you regret?

That you never really lived?

Or there was so much living left to do?

For those interested: pics and poetry have been added to my profile.

(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:13:25 AM   
velvetears


Posts: 2933
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

So a European shrink who has grown up with European biases has to become an expert on South American "popular cultural beliefs" to properly diagnose and treat a South American for 'delusion".

And how many years, months, weeks, days will this European shrink invest in this study for this one patient so as to not make a mistake in the diagnosis or treatment? And what is the patient to do while waiting for this shrink to learn enough to tell the patient whether he/she is deluded or not?

And people wonder why I have a healthy disrespect for psychiatry.


Not at all, why do you think it's called talk therapy - if the therspist thinks what he sees is a delusion he will question the patient further to find out if it stems from cultural belief or not.  Ask questions, listen - you know communicate with the patient. 

You don't understand psychiatry which is why you mistrust it so much.  You probably see people who use it or need it as weak and cannot ever fathom yourself as being seen as weak.  i bet you would say to a depressed person - get over it and get on with it the worlds not going to change (gloom doom), we still have to make the beds and  clean the coffee pots.. trudge trudge trudge. 


_____________________________

Religion is for people who are scared of hell, Spirituality is for people who have been there

(in reply to Bobkgin)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:18:34 AM   
chellekitty


Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
ok...i don't know if anyone ever went to the link that bob had in his tagline for the longest time...but i think it is relevant when dealing with bob....and i will give ya'll that link, well the specific page that he was quoting from, and say no more... http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/serial.htm

_____________________________

One thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve. ~Albert Schweitzer

(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:26:41 AM   
GoldStallion


Posts: 68
Joined: 8/28/2007
Status: offline
 Actually getting to grips with tiny jobs is probably a good idea for someone who is out of touch with reality - its the the nitty gritty day to day living that grounds people in reality. Using the body, working with solidity eg gardening, being in touch with nature and reality. These are all helpful for those who have lost touch.

Personally I think that psychiatry has very little to offer. A psychiatrist is a human being, and they may have a LOT to offer if they can contact the patient in the right way; but tablets are not an ideal solution. Its a wacky fringe medicine, western medicine. Its got fuck all to do with health and everything to do with money. I feel sorry for the people who get sucked into it wanting help or seeking to provide help. They get a terrible deal.

_____________________________

You can lead an idiot to knowledge, but you cant make them think.


(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:27:41 AM   
Bobkgin


Posts: 1335
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Kawarthas, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

So a European shrink who has grown up with European biases has to become an expert on South American "popular cultural beliefs" to properly diagnose and treat a South American for 'delusion".

And how many years, months, weeks, days will this European shrink invest in this study for this one patient so as to not make a mistake in the diagnosis or treatment? And what is the patient to do while waiting for this shrink to learn enough to tell the patient whether he/she is deluded or not?

And people wonder why I have a healthy disrespect for psychiatry.


Not at all, why do you think it's called talk therapy - if the therspist thinks what he sees is a delusion he will question the patient further to find out if it stems from cultural belief or not.  Ask questions, listen - you know communicate with the patient. 


And the deluded patient will say "yes, everyone in my village sees invisible 6-foot tall rabbits."

quote:


You don't understand psychiatry which is why you mistrust it so much.  You probably see people who use it or need it as weak and cannot ever fathom yourself as being seen as weak.  i bet you would say to a depressed person - get over it and get on with it the worlds not going to change (gloom doom), we still have to make the beds and  clean the coffee pots.. trudge trudge trudge. 


Velvet, you haven't been paying attention.

I have and do suffer from chronic depression.

I've had it for decades, and long ago learned to deal with it without meds.

What you are willing to bet on is immaterial to the discussion. I have asked questions and made statements about my experience, my doubts, and my thoughts on this issue.

I am not telling anyone to avoid seeking helping. But neither am I telling them to walk in with eyes closed and to treat everything a shrink says as gospel.

I've yet to hear anyone say this is bad advice.


_____________________________

When all is said and done, what will you regret?

That you never really lived?

Or there was so much living left to do?

For those interested: pics and poetry have been added to my profile.

(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:30:17 AM   
chellekitty


Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
tablets are not an ideal solution if your brain chemestry is not out of whack...however...if your brain chemestry IS out of whack tablets ARE an ideal solution....what a concept...my brain chemestry IS out of whack..my seizure med also happens to be ideal for dealing with bipolar no depression, no mania, AND i still feel the normal range of emotions!! its a fucking miracle...i am a much more stable kitty...however i am also an adhd kitty...i am so screwed...bipolar and adhd....fuck a duck...but i deal...its cool

_____________________________

One thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve. ~Albert Schweitzer

(in reply to GoldStallion)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:35:41 AM   
breatheasone


Posts: 4004
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
You know...this shit is BEYOND ridiculous....I can't BELIEVE I'm saying this but I hope mod11 locks this and EVERY thread a certain person KEEPS ruining for others by the SENSELESS needling and "I know it all listen to me." bull shit...and I think we all know WHO i am speaking about. Frankly I am sick of this persons negative impact on every thread they seem to visit.

_____________________________

Romans 10:13,For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Mike posts in black font
candy posts in pink font

(in reply to chellekitty)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:40:02 AM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: breatheasone

You know...this shit is BEYOND ridiculous....I can't BELIEVE I'm saying this but I hope mod11 locks this and EVERY thread a certain person KEEPS ruining for others by the SENSELESS needling and "I know it all listen to me." bull shit...and I think we all know WHO i am speaking about. Frankly I am sick of this persons negative impact on every thread they seem to visit.


Eep! If she does, I hope she doesn't do it again right after I post.  I felt horrible when that happened. 

< Message edited by WinsomeDefiance -- 10/3/2007 9:43:26 AM >

(in reply to breatheasone)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:41:09 AM   
Bobkgin


Posts: 1335
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Kawarthas, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

Psychiatry is a quasi-science for me because once it gets outside of organic causes it enters the world of philosophy.



Psychiatry is based in the medical study of brain chemistry, it is not quasi science nor is it part of the world of philosophy. 



Whenever you have to ascertain what is "real" and what is not, you've entered the world of philosophy.

Psychiatry can no more seperate itself from its subjective assumptions than philosophy. Those assumptions are formed within the matrix of the majority beliefs.



You don't know much about psychiatry if you think it is based on subjective assumptions and philosophy.  If you are correct then answer me this... how is it that psychiatry has helped schizophrenics, depressives, bi polars, psychotics? 



See the portion of my quote highlighted in red.

The catagories you've listed have organic causes.

quote:


i am not talking about psychotherapy - that is subjective and only as useful and helpful as the person reporting what is happening to them (the problem they have). 


Partly true. It is also contingent on the bias of the therapist.

But this is the branch of psychiatry I've been talking about, the part I view with suspicion.

quote:


You don't seem to differentiate the two. 


You do not seem to notice when I do. Review the portion of my quote I highlighted in red. It very clearly distinguishes between the two.



Give me examples of when psychiatry (modern day psychiatry) deals with any symptom outside of trying to find an organic cause



Apologies for overlooking this one till now:

"Psychiatry is a branch of medicine dealing with the prevention, assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of the mind and mental illness. Its primary goal is the relief of mental suffering associated with symptoms of disorder and improvement of mental well-being. This may be based in hospitals or in the community and patients may be voluntary or involuntary. Psychiatry adopts a medical approach but may take into account psychological and social/cultural perspectives. Treatment by medication alone or in conjunction with various forms of psychotherapy may be undertaken and has proved most efficacious."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychiatry

quote:


Psychiatrists today don't do "talk therapy", they listen to symptoms very carefully, just like a doctor does, and prescribe medication.  If symptoms don't improve they try a different med till one works.  One usually goes to a psychiatrist after a referral from a therspist who suspects the patient may have a an "organic problem" - imbalance in brain chemistry. 


Trial and error: the patient becomes a guinea pig.

_____________________________

When all is said and done, what will you regret?

That you never really lived?

Or there was so much living left to do?

For those interested: pics and poetry have been added to my profile.

(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:45:00 AM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

For me, life is a learning experience that never ends. I've always accepted the possibility that what I believe now will be replaced by something better at some point in the future.



Wow.

So you're never wrong...you're always right with the possibility that in the future you will be right in a different way?

I do see your point Chelle...I try to keep an open mind throughout 90% of my debates and hen it comes to things that I refuse to be convinced on (such as 'is pederasty acceptable')  I make it clear as soon as it becomes a debate that I have no interest in changing my mind and they can continue talking if it makes them feel better 

I mean come on now...the last thread I started changed my mind within 3 pages  yet I've seen threads go on for 20 pages, where the closest Bob comes to admitting he was wrong is denying he said something.  Which to be honest is a definite "I'm wrong" in my eyes but still...I think it's the root of all this mess.

I have to say though that 'giving weight to rational and mature individuals' tends to mean 'those with the patience of a saint who will continue the circuitious argument without calling him out on the lack of logic or consistency.'  And 'take what you need and leave the rest' basically sounds like 'ignore anything that doesn't either support my view or is poorly constructed enough that I can shred it.'

But all in all an excellent observation.  1083 posts and not a single "you're right, I've changed my mind" in any of them.

(in reply to Bobkgin)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:45:00 AM   
GoldStallion


Posts: 68
Joined: 8/28/2007
Status: offline
I am not knocking what works, quite the opposite. If it works thats great - but it doesnt make it an ideal. The ideal would be no tablets (and attendant side effects) AND no problems.

However, there are reasons why brain chemistry goes out of balance.

The reasons are the root, the symptoms are the branch, and the chemistry is a symptom (which manifests as whatever problems you end up with)

The reasons might be any one of a large number - physical, emotional, spiritual, etc and they may not even be seated in the brain at all - all the major organs produce hormones and biochemical feedback effects, its far more complex than science can deal with at this point in time.

Forcing chemistry with tablets is not an ideal solution, because its forcing, and in terms of health forcing is not the way. Thats obvious, just look at anatomy and physiology, just observe. Its a very delicate balance and its all interlinked. No one knows all the chemical relationships and pathways that go on. They know a miniscule fraction. But if you crank up one bit the rest has to follow. Bit like beating a tired horse. Eventually there will be a problem.

Supress a symptom it will create a bigger problem somewhere else.

Look, if there was a fire and the fire brigade came and just switched the fire alarms off, shut the door on the blaze and said "There we go, all done" you would be unimpressed. And then you would have a bigger fire to deal with later.
Much better to see whats going on and find non forcing solutions to help that. People are individuals as well, and thats never diagnosed, there is no method of differential diagnosis of the individual in psychiatry. So what works for person A with depression may not work for person B, even before you consider there might be 100 different roots for depression.

Thats why Psychiatry doesnt impress me.

_____________________________

You can lead an idiot to knowledge, but you cant make them think.


(in reply to chellekitty)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:45:38 AM   
cautiousiasub


Posts: 199
Joined: 10/17/2005
Status: offline
Bob, is your chronic depression the same depression that you were talking about earlier that relates to the sad shape of the world today? From my understanding, that isn't a chronic depression, it's situational...being depressed because of how you see the world. Someone who suffers chronic depression may say "I'm depressed when I have nothing to be depressed about." It doesn't relate to any situation.

As far as your distrust of "psychiatry" I believe you are confusing psychiatry with psychotherapy. Look up the definitions and you may have a better understanding. Psychiatry is a branch of medicine that deals with chemical imbalances, etc. Psychotherapy is a little more subjective. There is still a lot of trial and error in the medical field. We don't know all there is to know about the human body and it's functions. Look back to 100 years ago and the advances in the medical field. Can you imagine the advances 100 years from now?

(in reply to Bobkgin)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." - 10/3/2007 9:46:45 AM   
KatyLied


Posts: 13029
Joined: 2/24/2005
From: Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

Trial and error: the patient becomes a guinea pig.


This is certainly not limited to the practice of psychiatry.
I went through trial and error for medications when I was suffering from seasonal allergies that morphed into asthma. 


_____________________________

“If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things.”
- Albert Einstein

(in reply to Bobkgin)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: "Partners on behavioural Meds..." Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109